Literature DB >> 20171997

Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis.

Anne Salonen1, Janne Nikkilä, Jonna Jalanka-Tuovinen, Outi Immonen, Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović, Riina A Kekkonen, Airi Palva, Willem M de Vos.   

Abstract

Several different protocols are used for fecal DNA extraction, which is an integral step in all phylogenetic and metagenomic approaches to characterize the highly diverse intestinal ecosystem. We compared four widely used methods, and found their DNA yields to vary up to 35-fold. Bacterial, archaeal and human DNA was quantified by real-time PCR, and a compositional analysis of different extracts was carried out using the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic microarray. The overall microbiota composition was highly similar between the methods in contrast to the profound differences between the subjects (Pearson correlations >0.899 and 0.735, respectively). A detailed comparative analysis of mechanical and enzymatic methods showed that despite their overall similarity, the mechanical cell disruption by repeated bead beating showed the highest bacterial diversity and resulted in significantly improved DNA extraction efficiency of archaea and some bacteria, including Clostridium cluster IV. By applying the mechanical disruption method a high prevalence (67%) of methanogenic archaea was detected in healthy subjects (n=24), exceeding the typical values reported previously. The assessment of performance differences between different methodologies serves as a concrete step towards the comparison and reliable meta-analysis of the results obtained in different laboratories. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20171997     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  209 in total

1.  A metagenome of a full-scale microbial community carrying out enhanced biological phosphorus removal.

Authors:  Mads Albertsen; Lea Benedicte Skov Hansen; Aaron Marc Saunders; Per Halkjær Nielsen; Kåre Lehmann Nielsen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  High-yield and phylogenetically robust methods of DNA recovery for analysis of microbial biofilms adherent to plant biomass in the herbivore gut.

Authors:  Carly P Rosewarne; Phillip B Pope; Stuart E Denman; Christopher S McSweeney; Paraic O'Cuiv; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue.

Authors:  Páraic Ó Cuív; Daniel Aguirre de Cárcer; Michelle Jones; Eline S Klaassens; Daniel L Worthley; Vicki L J Whitehall; Seungha Kang; Christopher S McSweeney; Barbara A Leggett; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Optimal Recovery of Metagenomic DNA from Human and Environmental Samples.

Authors:  Mohita Gaur; Aarushi Vasudeva; Anoop Singh; Vishal Sharma; Himani Khurana; Ram Krishan Negi; Jung-Kul Lee; Vipin Chandra Kalia; Richa Misra; Yogendra Singh
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.461

5.  Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men.

Authors:  Anne Salonen; Leo Lahti; Jarkko Salojärvi; Grietje Holtrop; Katri Korpela; Sylvia H Duncan; Priya Date; Freda Farquharson; Alexandra M Johnstone; Gerald E Lobley; Petra Louis; Harry J Flint; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Microarray analysis and barcoded pyrosequencing provide consistent microbial profiles depending on the source of human intestinal samples.

Authors:  Bartholomeus van den Bogert; Willem M de Vos; Erwin G Zoetendal; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  A mechanical cell disruption microfluidic platform based on an on-chip micropump.

Authors:  Yinuo Cheng; Yue Wang; Zhiyuan Wang; Liang Huang; Mingzhao Bi; Wenxiao Xu; Wenhui Wang; Xiongying Ye
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  Progress of analytical tools and techniques for human gut microbiome research.

Authors:  Eun-Ji Song; Eun-Sook Lee; Young-Do Nam
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians.

Authors:  Elena Biagi; Lotta Nylund; Marco Candela; Rita Ostan; Laura Bucci; Elisa Pini; Janne Nikkïla; Daniela Monti; Reetta Satokari; Claudio Franceschi; Patrizia Brigidi; Willem De Vos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control.

Authors:  Fredrik H Karlsson; Valentina Tremaroli; Intawat Nookaew; Göran Bergström; Carl Johan Behre; Björn Fagerberg; Jens Nielsen; Fredrik Bäckhed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.