| Literature DB >> 31998531 |
In-Ho Bae1,2, Myung Ho Jeong1,2,3,4, Dae Sung Park1,2, Kyung Seob Lim5, Jae Won Shim1,2, Mun Ki Kim1, Jun-Kyu Park6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanical and physio-biological properties of peptide-coated stent (PCS) compared to commercialized drug-eluting stents (DESs).Entities:
Keywords: Drug-eluting stent; Mechanical properties; Peptide delivery; Peptide-coated stent; Re-endothelialization
Year: 2020 PMID: 31998531 PMCID: PMC6979279 DOI: 10.1186/s40824-020-0182-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomater Res ISSN: 1226-4601
Fig. 1Surface morphologies of PCS. SEM images of before (a) and after (b) peptide coating procedure. A representative image taken under fluorescence microscopy showed FITC-conjugated PCS (c). All magnification of images was ser as 100 ×
Fig. 2In vitro peptide disappearances on stent strut. The PCS was located at inside of silicon tube and PBS was circulated through silicon tube with 150 rpm. The PCS was taken out at every designated time point and subjected to fluorescence microscopy observation
Fig. 3Proliferation of HUVEC. Cells were cultured in 24-well cell culture dish contained the 2-dimensional PCS and BMS. Results were obtained by XTT assay. Each datum point represents the mean ± SD (n = 10). *p < 0.05
Fig. 4Mechanical properties of PCS and DESs. Radial force (a) and flexibility (b) were investigated by flat plate compression and 3-point bending test, respectively. Plastic deformation result of recoil (c) and foreshortening (d) was investigated under FDA guide line. Each datum point represents the mean ± SD (n = 10). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005
Compliance performance of various stents. Nominal pressure for each diameter indicated by bold font
| Pressure | Stents | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atm | kPa | PCS | Xience Prime™ | Promus Element™ | Endeavor Resolute™ | Biomatrix™ |
| 6 | 608 | 2.73 | 2.67 | 2.56 | 2.95 | 3.00 |
| 7 | 709 | 2.86 | 2.77 | 2.63 | 3.00 | 3.03 |
| 8 | 811 | 2.97 | 2.87 | 2.72 | 3.05 | 3.06 |
| 9 | 912 | 3.02 | 2.95 | 2.81 | 3.10 | 3.09 |
| 10 | 1013 | 3.08 | 3.01 | 2.88 | 3.15 | 3.12 |
| 11 | 1115 | 3.15 | 3.08 | 2.95 | 3.20 | 3.15 |
| 12 | 1216 | 3.20 | 3.13 | 3.01 | 3.25 | 3.18 |
| 13 | 1317 | 3.25 | 3.19 | 3.06 | 3.30 | 3.21 |
| 14 | 1419 | 3.29 | 3.23 | 3.10 | 3.30 | 3.24 |
Fig. 5In vivo peptide delivery. The PCS was implanted to rabbit iliac arteries and the peptide delivery to vessels surrounding PCS was detected by FITC observation. At every designated time, the vessel surrounding PCS was isolated and subjected to fluorescence microscopy observation