| Literature DB >> 31992729 |
Mario Barbato1, Frank Hailer2, Maulik Upadhyay3,4, Marcello Del Corvo5, Licia Colli5, Riccardo Negrini5, Eui-Soo Kim6, Richard P M A Crooijmans3, Tad Sonstegard6, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan7.
Abstract
Cattle domestication occurred at least twice independently and gave rise to the modern taurine and indicine cattle breeds. European cattle diversity is generally dominated by taurine cattle, although elevated levels of indicine ancestry have been recorded in several breeds from southern Europe. Here we use genome-wide high-density SNP genotyping data to investigate the taurine and indicine ancestry in southern European cattle, based on a dataset comprising 508 individuals from 23 cattle breeds of taurine, indicine and mixed ancestry, including three breeds from Central Italy known to exhibit the highest levels of indicine introgression among southern European breeds. Based on local genomic ancestry analyses, we reconstruct taurine and indicine ancestry genome-wide and along chromosomes. We scrutinise local genomic introgression signals and identify genomic regions that have introgressed from indicine into taurine cattle under positive selection, harbouring genes with functions related to body size and feed efficiency. These findings suggest that indicine-derived traits helped enhance Central Italian cattle through adaptive introgression. The identified genes could provide genomic targets for selection for improved cattle performance. Our findings elucidate the key role of adaptive introgression in shaping the phenotypic features of modern cattle, aided by cultural and livestock exchange among historic human societies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31992729 PMCID: PMC6987186 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57880-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Sample information and diversity indices. Diversity indexes were computed for those breeds having sample size >10).
| Acronym | Breed | Origin | N | Ho (SD) | Ne | FROH (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANG | Angus | European | 37 | 0.29 (0.19) | 135 | 0.29 (0.04) |
| BSW | Brown Swiss | European | 54 | 0.29 (0.20) | 98 | 0.27 (0.03) |
| FLV | Fleckvieh | European | 55 | 0.30 (0.19) | 126 | 0.22 (0.02) |
| HFD | Hereford | European | 24 | 0.30 (0.18) | 118 | 0.34 (0.09) |
| HOL | Holstein | European | 55 | 0.31 (0.19) | 110 | 0.24 (0.03) |
| LMS | Limousin | European | 40 | 0.31 (0.19) | 152 | 0.21 (0.02) |
| PIE | Piedmontese | North Italy | 24 | 0.32 (0.19) | 147 | 0.17 (0.01) |
| MCG | Marchigiana | Central Italian White Cattle | 13 | 0.31 (0.21) | 107 | 0.20 (0.03) |
| ROM | Romagnola | Central Italian White Cattle | 30 | 0.30 (0.19) | 119 | 0.22 (0.02) |
| CHI | Chianina | Central Italian White Cattle | 16 | 0.30 (0.21) | 116 | 0.24 (0.01) |
| MAM | Maremmana | Central Italian | 5 | — | — | — |
| POD | Podolica | Southern Italian | 1 | — | — | — |
| BUS | Busha | Eastern European | 6 | — | — | — |
| RUG | Romanian Grey | Eastern European | 4 | — | — | — |
| BOK | Boskarin | Eastern European | 4 | — | — | — |
| CAR | Cardena | Iberian | 5 | — | — | — |
| LID | Lidia | Iberian | 3 | — | — | — |
| NDA | N’Dama | West Africa | 48 | 0.24 (0.18) | 148 | 0.31 (0.08) |
| ANW | Ankole-Watussi | Central Africa | 25 | 0.30 (0.19) | 175 | 0.20 (0.01) |
| NGA | Nganda | Central Africa | 26 | 0.32 (0.19) | 120 | 0.17 (0.04) |
| GIR | Gir | India | 28 | 0.21 (0.20) | 180 | 0.30 (0.03) |
| LOH | Lohani | India/Pakistan | 13 | 0.20 (0.22) | 104 | 0.32 (0.07) |
| THA | Tharparkar | Pakistan | 13 | 0.19 (0.23) | 63 | 0.39 (0.07) |
| total | 529 | |||||
N, number of individuals analysed in this work; Ho, observed heterozygosity and its standard deviation (SD); Ne, effective population size inferred 13 generations in the past; FROH, inbreeding coefficient computed from Runs of Homozygosity and its standard deviation (SD).
Figure 1Admixture plot comprising clustering solutions (K = 2–3) for 16 cattle breeds, based on 647,132 SNPs from the BovineHD SNPChip. The geographical origin of the breeds is indicated above the plot. Breed labels are available in Table 1. Results for higher values of K are shown in Fig. S1a.
Figure 2Consistently Introgressed Windows of Interest (CIWIs) in three Central Italian white cattle breeds (Chianina, Marchigiana and Romagnola), identifying genomic regions of indicine-derived ancestry. Each grey horizontal bar corresponds to one cattle autosome (1–29), and local ancestry within each of the three breeds is shown in one row per breed along each chromosome. Indicine ancestry, when evidenced, is shown in blue, pink and green, respectively, for each breed. Grey indicates a lack of consistent evidence of indicine ancestry.
Figure 3Local ancestry signals of indicine introgression into taurine cattle breeds, identified from chromosome painting, and identified Consistently Introgressed Windows of Interest (CIWIs) on BTA18. (A) Graphical representation of the chromosome painting results obtained using different combinations of reference populations of both taurine (red) and indicine (green) ancestry. (B) CIWI results for the same chromosome. See Table 1 for breed labels.
Genes located within the top 5% CIWIs shared by three Central Italian white cattle breeds, based on BovineHD SNPChip data. See Supplementary Table S1 for the full list, and Table 1 for breed labels.
| Chr | Position | Gene ID | Associated function | Top 1%* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | MCG | ROM | ||||
| 1 | 68.01–68.10 | PDIA5 | x | |||
| 1 | 68.26–68.42 | ADCY5 | x | |||
| 1 | 68.46–68.55 | HACD2 | x | |||
| 1 | 68.90–68.94 | CCDC14 | Beef traits | x | ||
| 1 | 68.95–68.99 | ROPN1 | Beef traits | x | ||
| 1 | 139.68–139.84 | CPNE4 | Growth traits | x | ||
| 5 | 11.31–11.31 | TMA7 | ||||
| 7 | 48.39–48.47 | H2AFY | Muscle regeneration | x | x | |
| 7 | 48.62–48.62 | NEUROG1 | x | x | ||
| 7 | 48.66–48.67 | CXCL14 | Body weight | x | x | |
| 13 | 46.78–46.83 | LARP4B | x | |||
| 13 | 47.04–47.18 | DIP2C | x | |||
| 13 | 47.20–47.26 | ZMYND11 | x | |||
| 13 | 47.40–47.42 | PRNP | x | |||
| 13 | 47.44–47.45 | PRND | x | |||
| 15 | 42.97–43.48 | SBF2 | Growth traits | x | x | |
| 15 | 43.51–43.59 | SWAP70 | x | x | ||
| 18 | 10.88–10.94 | USP10 | Gluconeogenesis | x | ||
| 18 | 10.99–11.05 | CRISPLD2 | Residual feed intake | x | ||
| 18 | 11.12–11.13 | ZDHHC7 | Residual feed intake | x | ||
| 18 | 11.17–11.19 | KIAA0513 | Residual feed intake | x | ||
| 18 | 11.20–11.21 | FAM92B | Residual feed intake | x | ||
| 24 | 62.51–62.53 | SERPINB7 | x | |||
| 24 | 62.59–62.61 | SERPINB2 | x | |||
| 24 | 62.62–62.64 | SERPINB10 | Feed efficiency | x | ||
Chr, chromosome; Position, physical coordinates in Mb. *While all genes listed in the table are in the top 5%, top 1% indicates which genes were recorded at an even higher stringency threshold (1%) applied on the genome-wide CIWI results.