Literature DB >> 17296777

Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production.

R S Hegarty1, J P Goopy, R M Herd, B McCorkell.   

Abstract

Seventy-six Angus steers chosen from breeding lines divergently selected for residual feed intake (RFI) were studied to quantify the relationship between RFI and the daily rate of methane production (MPR). A 70-d feeding test using a barley-based ration was conducted in which the voluntary DMI, feeding characteristics, and BW of steers were monitored. The estimated breeding value (EBV) for RFI (RFI(EBV)) for each steer had been calculated from 70-d RFI tests conducted on its parents. Methane production rate (g/d) was measured on each steer using SF(6) as a tracer gas in a series of 10-d measurement periods. Daily DMI of steers was lower during the methane measurement period than when methane was not being measured (11.18 vs. 11.88 kg; P = 0.001). A significant relationship existed between MPR and RFI when RFI (RFI(15d)) was estimated over the 15 d when steers were harnessed for methane collection (MPR = 13.3 x RFI(15d) + 179; r(2) = 0.12; P = 0.01). Animals expressing lower RFI had lower daily MPR. The relationship established between MPR and RFI(15d) was used to calculate a reduction in daily methane emission of 13.38 g accompanied a 1 kg/d reduction in RFI(EBV) in cattle consuming ad libitum a diet of 12.1 MJ of ME/kg. The magnitude of this emission reduction was between that predicted on the basis of intake reduction alone (18 g x d(-1) x kg of DMI(-1)) and that predicted by a model incorporating steer midtest BW and level of intake relative to maintenance (5 g x d(-1) x kg of DMI(-1)). Comparison of data from steers exhibiting the greatest (n = 10) and lowest (n = 10) RFI(15d) showed the low RFI(15d) group to not only have lower MPR (P = 0.017) but also reduced methane cost of growth (by 41.2 g of CH(4)/kg of ADG; P = 0.09). Although the opportunity to abate livestock MPR by selection against RFI seems great, RFI explained only a small proportion of the observed variation in MPR. A genotype x nutrition interaction can be anticipated, and the MPR:RFI(EBV) relationship will need to be defined over a range of diet types to account for this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17296777     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  52 in total

1.  Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Zhiquan Wang; Obioha N Durunna; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Associations between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane-producing activity, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle1.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Johnson; Gordon E Carstens; Wimberly K Krueger; Phillip A Lancaster; Erin G Brown; Luis O Tedeschi; Robin C Anderson; Kristen A Johnson; Arieh Brosh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Infrared thermography as a tool to evaluate body surface temperature and its relationship with feed efficiency in Bos indicus cattle in tropical conditions.

Authors:  Luciane Silva Martello; Saulo da Luz E Silva; Rodrigo da Costa Gomes; Rosana Ruegger Pereira da Silva Corte; Paulo Roberto Leme
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Poor feed efficiency in sheep is associated with several structural abnormalities in the community metabolic network of their ruminal microbes.

Authors:  Rocky D Patil; Melinda J Ellison; Sara M Wolff; Courtney Shearer; Anna M Wright; Rebecca R Cockrum; Kathy J Austin; William R Lamberson; Kristi M Cammack; Gavin C Conant
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Reducing methane emissions and the methanogen population in the rumen of Tibetan sheep by dietary supplementation with coconut oil.

Authors:  Xuezhi Ding; Ruijun Long; Qian Zhang; Xiaodan Huang; Xusheng Guo; Jiandui Mi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 1.559

8.  In vitro reduction of methane production by 3-nitro-1-propionic acid is dose-dependent1.

Authors:  Pedro Antonio Ochoa-García; Martha María Arevalos-Sánchez; Oscar Ruiz-Barrera; Robin C Anderson; Adrián Omar Maynez-Pérez; Felipe A Rodríguez-Almeida; América Chávez-Martínez; Héctor Gutiérrez-Bañuelos; Agustín Corral-Luna
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies.

Authors:  Mi Zhou; Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Mapping of the transcription start site (TSS) and identification of SNPs in the bovine neuropeptide Y (NPY) gene.

Authors:  Bojlul Bahar; Torres Sweeney
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.