Literature DB >> 23906376

Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation.

Philip W Hedrick1.   

Abstract

Adaptive genetic variation has been thought to originate primarily from either new mutation or standing variation. Another potential source of adaptive variation is adaptive variants from other (donor) species that are introgressed into the (recipient) species, termed adaptive introgression. Here, the various attributes of these three potential sources of adaptive variation are compared. For example, the rate of adaptive change is generally thought to be faster from standing variation, slower from mutation and potentially intermediate from adaptive introgression. Additionally, the higher initial frequency of adaptive variation from standing variation and lower initial frequency from mutation might result in a higher probability of fixation of the adaptive variants for standing variation. Adaptive variation from introgression might have higher initial frequency than new adaptive mutations but lower than that from standing variation, again making the impact of adaptive introgression variation potentially intermediate. Adaptive introgressive variants might have multiple changes within a gene and affect multiple loci, an advantage also potentially found for adaptive standing variation but not for new adaptive mutants. The processes that might produce a common variant in two taxa, convergence, trans-species polymorphism from incomplete lineage sorting or from balancing selection and adaptive introgression, are also compared. Finally, potential examples of adaptive introgression in animals, including balancing selection for multiple alleles for major histocompatibility complex (MHC), S and csd genes, pesticide resistance in mice, black colour in wolves and white colour in coyotes, Neanderthal or Denisovan ancestry in humans, mimicry genes in Heliconius butterflies, beak traits in Darwin's finches, yellow skin in chickens and non-native ancestry in an endangered native salamander, are examined.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; hybridization; mutation; standing variation; trans-species polymorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23906376     DOI: 10.1111/mec.12415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  194 in total

1.  Introgressive hybridization facilitates adaptive divergence in a recent radiation of monkeyflowers.

Authors:  Sean Stankowski; Matthew A Streisfeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Long-term balancing selection drives evolution of immunity genes in Capsella.

Authors:  Daniel Koenig; Jörg Hagmann; Rachel Li; Felix Bemm; Tanja Slotte; Barbara Neuffer; Stephen I Wright; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  The Role of Standing Variation in Geographic Convergent Adaptation.

Authors:  Peter L Ralph; Graham Coop
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Homoploid hybrid speciation and genome evolution via chromosome sorting.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Nazar A Shapoval; Boris A Anokhin; Alsu F Saifitdinova; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.

Authors:  Li Tian; Sarthok Rasique Rahman; Briana D Ezray; Luca Franzini; James P Strange; Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Vive la résistance: genome-wide selection against introduced alleles in invasive hybrid zones.

Authors:  Ryan P Kovach; Brian K Hand; Paul A Hohenlohe; Ted F Cosart; Matthew C Boyer; Helen H Neville; Clint C Muhlfeld; Stephen J Amish; Kellie Carim; Shawn R Narum; Winsor H Lowe; Fred W Allendorf; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Introgression of a Block of Genome Under Infinitesimal Selection.

Authors:  Himani Sachdeva; Nicholas H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Local PCA Shows How the Effect of Population Structure Differs Along the Genome.

Authors:  Han Li; Peter Ralph
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The Timing and Direction of Introgression Under the Multispecies Network Coalescent.

Authors:  Mark S Hibbins; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Admixture on the northern front: population genomics of range expansion in the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and secondary contact with the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Authors:  A Garcia-Elfring; R D H Barrett; M Combs; T J Davies; J Munshi-South; V Millien
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.