Literature DB >> 31919568

Computerized navigation for total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower complications and ninety-day readmissions: a nationwide linked analysis.

Elizabeth B Gausden1, Joseph E Popper2, Peter K Sculco3, Barret Rush4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate if the use of CA-THA was associated with lower complications in the first 90 days following THA compared with conventional THA.
METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients who underwent THA between 2012 and 2014. The primary outcome was arthroplasty-related complications within the first 90 days following THA. Multivariate models predicting the risk of complications, readmission, and revision-related readmission within 90 days of discharge were created.
RESULTS: A total of 309,252 patients with a minimum 90-day follow-up following elective primary THA were identified. After controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, indication, income, and type of insurance, the use of CA during THA resulted in a 12% reduced odds of 90-day complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: The use of CA-THA resulted in lower 90-day complication rates and readmission rates compared with traditional THA after controlling for confounding variables. There was no significant difference in the rates of revision surgery between the groups within the first 90 days.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications following total hip arthroplasty; Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty; THA

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31919568     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04475-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

Review 1.  An overview of economic issues in computer-assisted total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Don C Beringer; Jay J Patel; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  EOS-based cup navigation: Randomised controlled trial in 78 total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  N Verdier; A Billaud; T Masquefa; J Pallaro; T Fabre; C Tournier
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Reproduction of Hip Offset and Leg Length in Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Accurate Are We?

Authors:  Pregash Ellapparadja; Vivek Mahajan; Angela H Deakin; Kamal Deep
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Computer Navigation vs Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Medicare Database Analysis.

Authors:  Blake K Montgomery; Abiram Bala; James I Huddleston; Stuart B Goodman; William J Maloney; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Thirty-Day Complications of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 103,855 Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Ahmed A Aoude; Sultan A Aldebeyan; Anas Nooh; Michael H Weber; Michael Tanzer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  All-Cause Versus Complication-Specific Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele D'Apuzzo; Geoffrey Westrich; Chisa Hidaka; Ting Jung Pan; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  No Benefit After THA Performed With Computer-assisted Cup Placement: 10-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Alexandre Lunebourg; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Computer Navigation Helps Reduce the Incidence of Noise After Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Siddharth M Shah; Kamal Deep; Chaiyaporn Siramanakul; Vivek Mahajan; Frederic Picard; David J Allen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods.

Authors:  Brian C Najarian; John E Kilgore; David C Markel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christina I Esposito; Brian P Gladnick; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Timothy M Wright; David J Mayman; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  4 in total

1.  Can a simple iPad app improve C-arm based component position in anterior THA?

Authors:  Ulrich Bechler; Bernhard Springer; Kilian Rueckl; Tim Rolvien; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Accuracy of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system for cup placement and intraoperative leg length measurement in total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hiromasa Tanino; Yasuhiro Nishida; Ryo Mitsutake; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  A comparison of utilization and short-term complications of technology-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Trevor Simcox; Vivek Singh; Christian T Oakley; Omid S Barzideh; Ran Schwarzkopf; Joshua C Rozell
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-18

4.  Reduced Risk of Revision with Computer-Guided Versus Non-Computer-Guided THA: An Analysis of Manufacturer-Specific Data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

Authors:  Edward T Davis; Kerren D McKinney; Amir Kamali; Selena Kuljaca; Joseph Pagkalos
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.