Literature DB >> 26923496

Thirty-Day Complications of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 103,855 Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Ahmed A Aoude1, Sultan A Aldebeyan2, Anas Nooh3, Michael H Weber1, Michael Tanzer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has gained popularity in orthopedics for both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the past decades.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent a primary, unilateral THA and TKA from 2011 to 2013. Multivariate analysis was conducted to compare the postoperative complications in patients whose surgery involved the use of CAS with those by conventional techniques.
RESULTS: We identified 103,855 patients who had THA and TKA in the database between 2011 and 2013. There were higher overall adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; CI, 1.22-1.59), minor events (OR, 1.38; CI, 1.21-1.58), and requirements for blood transfusion (OR, 1.44; CI, 1.25-1.67) in the conventional group when compared with CAS for TKA. However, rate of reoperation was higher in the CAS group for TKA (OR, 1.60; CI, 1.15-2.25). The results also showed higher overall adverse events (OR, 2.61; CI, 2.09-3.26), minor events (OR, 2.82; CI, 2.24-3.42), and requirements for blood transfusion (OR, 3.41; CI, 2.62-4.44) in the conventional group when compared to CAS for THA. Nevertheless, superficial wound infections (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.26-0.81) were shown to be higher in the CAS group undergoing THA.
CONCLUSION: The use of CAS in THA and TKA reduced the number of minor adverse events in the first 30 days postoperatively. However, CAS was associated with an increased number of reoperations and superficial infections. The clinical benefits and disadvantages of CAS should be considered when determining the potential benefit-cost ratio of this technology.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSQIP; computer-assisted surgery; conventional technique; postoperative complications; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26923496     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  Continuous quality improvement in orthopedic surgery: changes and implications with health system funding reform.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Darren M Roffey; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  [Amélioration continue de la qualité en chirurgie orthopédique: modifications et répercussions de la réforme du financement du système de santé].

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Darren M Roffey; Stéphane Poitras
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Portable imageless navigation system and surgeon's estimate for accurate evaluation of acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty in supine position.

Authors:  Ryohei Takada; Tetsuya Jinno; Kazumasa Miyatake; Masanobu Hirao; Toshitaka Yoshii; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-10

4.  Computerized navigation for total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower complications and ninety-day readmissions: a nationwide linked analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Gausden; Joseph E Popper; Peter K Sculco; Barret Rush
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Matthew C Barrett; Andrew D Beswick; Andrew Judge; Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  Lancet Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10

6.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty marketing and patient education: an evaluation of quality, content and accuracy of related websites.

Authors:  Shai S Shemesh; Michael J Bronson; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Does the Timing of Pre-Operative Medical Evaluation Influence Perioperative Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes?

Authors:  Roy H Lan; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-03-22

8.  Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors.

Authors:  Joseph K Antonios; Shane Korber; Lakshmanan Sivasundaram; Cory Mayfield; Hyunwoo Paco Kang; Daniel A Oakes; Nathanael D Heckmann
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-03-12

9.  Accuracy of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system for cup placement and intraoperative leg length measurement in total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hiromasa Tanino; Yasuhiro Nishida; Ryo Mitsutake; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Retained pelvic pin site debris after navigated total hip replacement: Masquerading as an early-stage chondrosarcomatous lesion.

Authors:  A P Kurmis
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.