BACKGROUND: Noise after ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-recognized problem. Computer navigation has been shown to achieve desired implant orientation. Our aim was (1) to compare the incidence of noise between navigated and conventional CoC THAs and (2) to determine the factors associated with noise. METHODS: All patients undergoing CoC THA between March 2009 and August 2012 were considered for this study. Information regarding hip noise was obtained via telephone or postal interview. A comparable cohort of patients in navigated and conventional groups was used to evaluate the incidence of noise. RESULTS: A total of 375 CoC THAs using the same implant (202 navigated and 173 conventional) were evaluated. Patients <65 years of age had significantly greater incidence of noise (22.4% vs 6.1%; P < .001). To ensure similarity, a subgroup of cohort <65 years and a 32-mm head size was used to compare the incidence of noise between the navigated (68 THAs) and conventional (118 THAs) groups. Overall incidence of noise was significantly greater in the conventional group (28%) as compared with the navigated group (10%; P = .005). The relative risk of noise for the conventional vs the navigated group was 2.7 (P = .01), and for squeaking was 1.9 (P = .2). Squeaking THAs had significantly lower cup anteversion (13.4° ± 5.2°) as compared with the silent THAs (17.6° ± 6.9°; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Navigated CoC THAs were 2.7× less likely to have noise as compared with the conventional ones. Squeaking THAs had significantly lower cup anteversion as compared with the silent ones. Patients of age <65 years had significantly greater incidence of noise after CoC THA.
BACKGROUND: Noise after ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a well-recognized problem. Computer navigation has been shown to achieve desired implant orientation. Our aim was (1) to compare the incidence of noise between navigated and conventional CoC THAs and (2) to determine the factors associated with noise. METHODS: All patients undergoing CoC THA between March 2009 and August 2012 were considered for this study. Information regarding hip noise was obtained via telephone or postal interview. A comparable cohort of patients in navigated and conventional groups was used to evaluate the incidence of noise. RESULTS: A total of 375 CoC THAs using the same implant (202 navigated and 173 conventional) were evaluated. Patients <65 years of age had significantly greater incidence of noise (22.4% vs 6.1%; P < .001). To ensure similarity, a subgroup of cohort <65 years and a 32-mm head size was used to compare the incidence of noise between the navigated (68 THAs) and conventional (118 THAs) groups. Overall incidence of noise was significantly greater in the conventional group (28%) as compared with the navigated group (10%; P = .005). The relative risk of noise for the conventional vs the navigated group was 2.7 (P = .01), and for squeaking was 1.9 (P = .2). Squeaking THAs had significantly lower cup anteversion (13.4° ± 5.2°) as compared with the silent THAs (17.6° ± 6.9°; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Navigated CoC THAs were 2.7× less likely to have noise as compared with the conventional ones. Squeaking THAs had significantly lower cup anteversion as compared with the silent ones. Patients of age <65 years had significantly greater incidence of noise after CoC THA.