| Literature DB >> 31881716 |
Eirini Pegiou1, Roland Mumm2, Parag Acharya3, Ric C H de Vos2, Robert D Hall1,2,4.
Abstract
Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is one of the world's top 20 vegetable crops. Both green and white shoots (spears) are produced; the latter being harvested before becoming exposed to light. The crop is grown in nearly all areas of the world, with the largest production regions being China, Western Europe, North America and Peru. Successful production demands high farmer input and specific environmental conditions and cultivation practices. Asparagus materials have also been used for centuries as herbal medicine. Despite this widespread cultivation and consumption, we still know relatively little about the biochemistry of this crop and how this relates to the nutritional, flavour, and neutra-pharmaceutical properties of the materials used. To date, no-one has directly compared the contrasting compositions of the green and white crops. In this short review, we have summarised most of the literature to illustrate the chemical richness of the crop and how this might relate to key quality parameters. Asparagus has excellent nutritional properties and its flavour/fragrance is attributed to a set of volatile components including pyrazines and sulphur-containing compounds. More detailed research, however, is needed and we propose that (untargeted) metabolomics should have a more prominent role to play in these investigations.Entities:
Keywords: asparagus; asparagus aroma; flavour; phytonutrients; plant metabolomics; secondary metabolites
Year: 2019 PMID: 31881716 PMCID: PMC7022954 DOI: 10.3390/metabo10010017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Distribution of cultivation of Asparagus officinalis around the world. The origin is believed to be eastern Mediterranean, however, it grows also in central Europe, the Caucasus and western Asia. It was brought centuries ago to North America, Northern Europe and parts of South America, North Africa and Australia. © Copyright 2017 World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 [3].
Figure 2Asparagus officinalis (white) from seed to harvested product. (A) asparagus seeds, primed in water in order to help germination when sown. (B) asparagus root crown, one-year old, ready to be planted in the field. (C) new asparagus field with two-year old plants. (D) asparagus field in harvesting season with plastic covers to raise soil temperature. The black plastic covers the plants during the whole harvesting period to eliminate light exposure to the spears. (E) white asparagus shoots emerging from 40 cm deep in the soil. (F) harvested white asparagus spears. All pictures taken in Limburg, The Netherlands (spring 2019).
Nutritional overview of raw and cooked asparagus (100 g) and for reference, the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) of the nutrients based on a 2000 kcal diet. Indicated are also the values of the listed nutrients present in spinach considered as the No. 1 of the 14 healthiest vegetables in the world [19].
| Nutrient | Value per 100 g Raw Asparagus [ | Value per 100 g Cooked Asparagus [ | Value per 100 g Raw Spinach (1st in the Top-14 Healthiest Vegetables) | RDI based on a 2000 Kcal Diet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overal Nutrition Facts | ||||
| Calories | 20 kcal | 20 kcal | 23 kcal | 2000 kcal |
| Dietary fibres | 2.1 g | 2 g | 2.2 g | 25 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 1.3 g | 0.4 g | 90 g |
| Proteins | 2.2 g | 2.4 g | 2.9 g | 40–50 g |
| Fat content | 0.12 g | 0.22 g | 0.4 g | 65 g |
| Vitamins | ||||
| Vitamin B1, thiamin | 0.143 mg | 0.162 mg | 0.078 mg | 1.4 mg |
| Vitamin B2. riboflavin | 0.141 mg | 0.139 mg | 0.189 mg | 1.6 mg |
| Vitamin B3, niacin | 0.978 mg | 1.1 mg | 0.724 mg | 15 mg |
| Vitamin B9, folate | 52 | 149 | 194 | 400 |
| Vitamin C, ascorbic acid | 5.6 mg | 7.7 mg | 28.1 mg | 75 mg |
| Vitamin E, alpha-tocopherol | 1.13 mg | 1.5 mg | 2.03 mg | 10 mg |
| Vitamin K | 41.6 | 50.6 | 482.9 | 80 |
| Minerals | ||||
| Calcium, Ca | 24 mg | 23 mg | 99 mg | 1000 mg |
| Copper, Cu | 0.19 mg | 0.19 mg | 0.13 mg | 0.9 mg |
| Iron, Fe | 2.14 mg | 0.91 mg | 2.71 mg | 15 mg |
| Magnesium, Mg | 14 mg | 14 mg | 79 mg | 350 mg |
| Manganese, Mn | 0.158 mg | 0.158 mg | 0.897 mg | 5 mg |
| Potassium, K | 202 mg | 224 mg | 558 mg | 3500 mg |
| Selenium, Se | 2.3 | 10.8 | 1 | 35 |
| Sodium, Na | 2 mg | 14 mg | 79 mg | 1500 mg |
| Zinc, Zn | 0.54 mg | 0.54 mg | 0.53 mg | 15 mg |
Summarized list of the key odorants in cooked asparagus flavour, based on the literature. The concentration in asparagus, odour threshold in water [126] and the characteristic aroma attribute of each volatile are also indicated if known (MW: molecular weight in g/mol, nq: not quantified, nd: not determined).
| Volatile Compound, Molecular Formula (MW) | Reported Concentration in Asparagus (ppb) | Odour Threshold in Water (ppb) | Aroma Attribute | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dimethyl sulphide, | 3300 | 0.12 | Sulphurous, onion-like, asparagus | [ |
| 2,3-butanedione, | nq | 8.6 | Sweet, buttery, caramel | [ |
| 3-methylthio-propionanal, | nq | 0.2 | Sulphurous, cheesy, cooked egg, baked potato | [ |
| 2,3-pentanedione, | nq | 20 | Buttery, caramel, roasted, nutty | [ |
| trans-2-hexenal, | 13 | 17 | Green, fresh, fruity | [ |
| hexanal, | 100–260 | 4.5 | Green, fresh, grass, woody | [ |
| 2,6-dimethyl pyrazine, | 200 | 800–1800 | Earthy, rusty, nutty, woody, greasy | [ |
| 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl pyrazine, | nq | 1 | Nutty, roasted, coffee | [ |
| 2-methoxy-3-isopropyl pyrazine, | nq | 0.002–10 | Earthy | [ |
| 2,3-octanedione, | nq | nd | Cooked, buttery, dill-like, broccoli-like | [ |
| 1-octen-3-ol, | 42–300 | 1 | Earthy, mushroom-like | [ |
| 2-isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine, | nq | 0.002–0.016 | Spicy, earthy, green, sprout-like | [ |
| 2-pentylfuran, | 2–165 | 6 | Buttery, earthy | [ |
Figure 3Re-worked summary of the data from [97].The sensory profile of asparagus with low (pink) and high (green) acceptability as was calculated based on the average of the sensory profiles of 12 different cultivars in Europe in 2004. The typical odour corresponds to the right balance of compounds and aroma attributes presented in Table 2 and Figure 4. The musty odour is basically due to unbalanced ratios of C8 ketones and alcohols, based on the findings of [128].
Figure 4The Asparagus Sensory Wheel - constructed based on key odorants and sensory attributes from the literature reported in this review. The key odorants from Table 2 are included next to the main aroma attribute of their contribution for the typical asparagus odour. The key to a pleasant aroma profile is the right balance of all the aroma attributes and therefore, concentrations of the key odorants.
Seminal moments in the history of smelly asparagus urine.
| Year | Observation | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Literature recognition | ||
| 1702 | Asparagus.... causes a powerful/filthy and disagreeable smell in the urine as everybody knows. | [ |
| 1731 | “ ....Of the Stems of Plants, some contain a sine Aperient Salt, and are Diaretick and Saponaceous, as Asparagus which affects the Urine with a Fetid Smell (especially if cut when they are white)....” (- and later included in the definition of Asparagus in Samuel Johnstons First Dictionary of the English Language Vol 1 Edition 1 (1755)) | [ |
| 1770 | “A few Stems of Asparagus eaten, shall give our Urine a disagreable Odour” | [ |
| 1913 | "....but what fascinated me would be the asparagus, .... all night long after a dinner at which I had partaken of them, they played .... at transforming my humble chamber into a bower of aromatic perfume." | [ |
| Scientific | ||
| 1891 | Urine smell proposed to be related to S-compound first identified as methanethiol | [ |
| 1956 | Polymorphism reported within 115 individuals—two genes assoc-iated with ability to produce/excrete the S-compound (methane-thiol) in urine after eating Asparagus; excretor gene is dominant | [ |
| 1975 | Adding two S-compounds to urine resulted in the characteristic odour ‘likely through formation of methanethiol’ | [ |
| 1980 | 328 Israelis divided into smellers/non-smellers but concluded that production was ‘universal’ and suggest also a genetically determined odour hypersensitivity in 10% of volunteers. | [ |
| 1987 | 800 volunteers eat asparagus – just under half 43% are excreters. Family studies also confirmed genetic polymorphism/Autosomal dominant gene and phenotype not age or sex related | [ |
| 2001 | 12 S-compounds identified (many with low odour thresholds) using SPME GC-MS and excretion dynamics followed 10 min–16 h | [ |
| 2010 | First web-based GWAS survey of asparagus eaters. 63% smelled; But failed to recognise that there may be non-producers/smellers. Appears to stem from a single switched base-pair mutation in a cluster of 50 genes coding for olfactory receptors | [ |
| 2011 | GWAs but solved issue limiting conclusions from Eriksson related to discriminating non-producers/smellers etc. Basis of inability to produce is still unknown but inability to smell is linked to an SNP in a 50 gene cluster on Chromosome 1. | [ |
| 2016 | Confirmed results of Eriksson but again made the mistake of not discriminating non-producers from non-smellers. | [ |