| Literature DB >> 35662938 |
Gan-Lin Chen1,2, Bo Lin1,2, Feng-Jin Zheng1,2, Wei-Hua Yu3, Xiao-Chun Fang1,2, Qian Shi3, Yi-Feng Hu3, Krishan K Verma4,5,6.
Abstract
Asparagus [Asparagus cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr.] is a traditional herbal medicine plant commonly used to nourish yin, moisten dryness, and clear fire cough symptoms. Drying is an excellent option to conserve food materials, i.e., grains, fruits, vegetables, and herbs, reducing the raw materials volume and weight. This study aims to evaluate different drying approaches that could increase the value of asparagus, particularly as an ingredient in fast foods or as nutraceutical byproducts. The volatile components of asparagus roots were analyzed by using headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectroscopy under different drying conditions, i.e., natural drying (ND) at ambient air temperature in the dark, well-ventilated room, temperature range 28-32°C, blast or oven drying at 50°C, heat pump or hot-air drying at temperature 50°C and air velocity at 1.5 ms-1 and vacuum freeze-drying at the temperature of -45°C and vacuum pressure of 10-30 Pa for 24 h. The findings revealed that the various drying processes had multiple effects on the color, odor index, and volatile compounds of the asparagus roots. As a result of the investigations, multiple characteristics of components, therefore, exploitation and comparison of various flavors; a total of 22 compounds were identified, such as alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, acids, esters, heterocyclic, and terpene. The present findings may help understand the flavor of the processed asparagus roots and find a better option for drying and processing.Entities:
Keywords: Asparagus cochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr.; HS-GC-IMS; drying; fingerprint spectrum; volatile compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35662938 PMCID: PMC9159512 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.868209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Two-dimensional overview of the gas phase-ion migration of volatile compounds in asparagus roots with different drying methods. P, common variety; G, Guidong no. 1 variety; ND, natural drying; HD, heat pump drying; VFD, vacuum freeze-drying; and BD, blast drying.
Qualitative properties of volatile compounds in aspartame dried products.
| Category | S. no. | Compound | CAS # | Formula | Retention time (RT) | Keep time(s) |
| Alcohols | 1 | Ethanol-D | 64175 | C2H6O | 27.299 | 215 |
| 2 | Ethanol-M | 64175 | C2H6O | 48.222 | 248 | |
| 3 | 1-Pentanol | 71410 | C5H12O | 70.706 | 117 | |
| 4 | 3-hexen-1-ol | 928961 | C6H12O | 54.781 | 128 | |
| Ketones | 1 | Acetone | 67641 | C3H6O | 44.635 | 215 |
| 2 | 2-octanone | 111137 | C8H16O | 58.061 | 116 | |
| 3 | Acetophenone | 98862 | C8H8O | 51.947 | 57 | |
| 4 | Cyclohexanone | 108941 | C6H10O | 33.507 | 121 | |
| Aldehydes | 1 | (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal | 557482 | C9H14O | 64.773 | 72 |
| 2 | Pentanal | 110623 | C5H10O | 18.379 | 248 | |
| 3 | 2-Methylbutanal | 96173 | C5H10O | 79.693 | 103 | |
| 4 | Benzaldehyde | 100527 | C7H6O | 56.941 | 38 | |
| Acids | 1 | 3-methylbutyric acid-M | 503742 | C5H10O2 | 107.123 | 88 |
| 2 | 3-methylbutyric acid-D | 503742 | C5H10O2 | 69.322 | 55 | |
| 3 | Acetic acid-D | 64197 | C2H4O2 | 34.378 | 122 | |
| 4 | Acetic acid-M | 64197 | C2H4O2 | 29.517 | 211 | |
| Esters | 1 | Ethyl acetate-M | 141786 | C4H8O2 | 47.151 | 144 |
| 2 | Ethyl acetate-D | 141786 | C4H8O2 | 42.397 | 121 | |
| 3 | 1-Butanol | 71363 | C4H10O | 79.490 | 99 | |
| Heterocyclic compound | 1 | 2-methylpyrazine | 109080 | C5H6N2 | 52.660 | 145 |
| 2 | Tetramethylpyrazine | 1124114 | C8H12N2 | 85.993 | 148 | |
| Terpenes | 1 | Limonene | 138863 | C10H16 | 60.833 | 139 |
M, monomer; D, dimer.
FIGURE 2Chromatograms of volatile compounds extracted from dried asparagus roots using gas-chromatography ion mobility spectrometry. For compounds listed in Table 1.
FIGURE 3The Gallery Plot (fingerprint spectrum) of asparagus root samples with different drying methods.
The difference analysis of the relative intensity of each odor index of asparagus treated roots with different drying methods.
| Array number | Sensor | Performance description | P-ND | G-ND | P-HD | G-HD | P-BD | G-BD | P-FVD | G-FVD |
| S1 | W1C | Sensitive to aromatic compounds | 0.9370 ± 0.01a | 0.8112 ± 0.01d | 0.8986 ± 0.02b | 0.8594 ± 0.01c | 0.9419 ± 0.00a | 0.9433 ± 0.01a | 0.8478 ± 0.02c | 0.8065 ± 0.02d |
| S2 | W5S | High sensitivity, very sensitive to nitrogen oxides | 1.2689 ± 0.08d | 3.4430 ± 0.16c | 1.4406 ± 0.07d | 1.6387 ± 0.04d | 1.2618 ± 0.01d | 1.2349 ± 0.03d | 6.6845 ± 0.45b | 7.9804 ± 0.53a |
| S3 | W3C | Detection of aromatic components (especially ammonia) | 1.0035 ± 0.01c | 1.0583 ± 0.02b | 1.0032 ± 0.01c | 1.053 ± 0.04b | 1.0327 ± 0.00 | 1.0543 ± 0.04b | 1.0689 ± 0.02b | 1.1158 ± 0.01a |
| S4 | W6S | Used for selective detection of hydrogen (only detection of hydrogen in the aroma gas stream entering the electronic nose system) | 1.0083 ± 0.01a | 1.0063 ± 0.01a | 1.0099 ± 0.00a | 1.0130 ± 0.00a | 0.9918 ± 0.00b | 0.9909 ± 0.00b | 1.0066 ± 0.00a | 1.009 ± 0.00a |
| S5 | W5C | Alkanes, aromatic compounds, compounds with little polarity | 0.9813 ± 0.01a | 0.9206 ± 0.01d | 0.9590 ± 0.00b | 0.9361 ± 0.00c | 0.9743 ± 0.01a | 0.9811 ± 0.00a | 0.9277 ± 0.00 | 0.9072 ± 0.01e |
| S6 | W1S | Mainly sensitive to methane in the environment, with high sensitivity | 2.9834 ± 0.40e | 8.0980 ± 0.54b | 4.8442 ± 0.57d | 7.14523 ± 0.55c | 3.2764 ± 0.04e | 3.2205 ± 0.33e | 7.6751 ± 0.52 | 10.0492 ± 0.47a |
| S7 | W1W | Mainly sensitive to sulfide (can detect 0.1 μg/g hydrogen sulfide) Very sensitive to many terpenes and organic sulfur compounds (mainly for the detection of odor, limonene, and piperazine) | 3.7710 ± 0.75d | 13.2188 ± 1.56a | 5.3186 ± 0.42c | 7.5072 ± 0.78b | 3.7111 ± 0.10d | 3.6863 ± 0.38d | 14.5144 ± 0.58a | 14.2113 ± 0.88a |
| S8 | W2S | Ethanol detection is also sensitive to some aromatic compounds | 1.4813 ± 0.11e | 2.4005 ± 0.10b | 1.7490 ± 0.10d | 2.1871 ± 0.10c | 1.4481 ± 0.01e | 1.4502 ± 0.05e | 2.3115 ± 0.09 | 2.6756 ± 0.06a |
| S9 | W2W | Aromatic ingredients, sensitive to organic sulfur compounds | 2.7881 ± 0.32 | 10.8168 ± 0.66c | 3.9123 ± 0.34e | 5.5660 ± 0.38d | 2.8094 ± 0.04 | 2.8136 ± 0.27 | 11.9450 ± 0.23b | 13.0620 ± 0.22a |
| S10 | W3S | Used to detect high-concentration alkanes (>100 μg/g) | 1.0248 ± 0.03a | 1.0362 ± 0.06a | 1.0597 ± 0.02a | 1.0484 ± 0.04a | 1.0036 ± 0.07a | 0.9608 ± 0.04a | 1.0130 ± 0.03a | 1.0047 ± 0.09a |
P, common variety; G, Guidong no. 1 variety; ND, natural drying; HD, heat pump drying; VFD, vacuum freeze-drying; and BD. blast drying. Significant variances in the values of the same group are indicated by different lowercase letters (n = 3, P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4The analysis of principal component scores of different drying methods for the quality of asparagus samples.
Color analysis of asparagus treated with different drying methods.
| Drying condition | L | a | b | Δ E |
| P-initial | 38.91 ± 1.19 | −1.06 ± 0.11c | 1.56 ± 0.99d | 38.96 ± 2.86 |
| G-initial | 41.03 ± 2.78 | −1.39 ± 0.15c | 0.84 ± 0.87d | 41.07 ± 1.23b |
| P-ND | 31.49 ± 4.11f | 2.19 ± 1.56b | 13.52 ± 4.20b | 34.44 ± 5.42d |
| G-ND | 34.28 ± 4.37 | 1.88 ± 0.89b | 13.35 ± 3.8b | 36.92 ± 5.23 |
| P-HD | 36.85 ± 3.79 | 3.69 ± 0.98a | 18.61 ± 2.7a | 41.49 ± 4.32b |
| G-HD | 36.72 ± 4.59 | 3.48 ± 1.26a | 18.13 ± 3.64a | 41.20 ± 5.15b |
| P-BD | 37.33 ± 3.15 | 2.84 ± 0.99 | 18.11 ± 2.69a | 17.60 ± 1.62e |
| G-BD | 42.38 ± 3.69b | 2.65 ± 1.91 | 20.12 ± 3.42a | 20.53 ± 3.71e |
| P-FVD | 82.66 ± 1.54a | −0.60 ± 0.32c | 13.16 ± 1.73b | 83.72 ± 1.41a |
| G-FVD | 81.11 ± 7.98a | −1.20 ± 0.38c | 10.21 ± 1.51c | 84.17 ± 2.51a |
P, common variety; G, Guidong no. 1 variety; ND, natural drying; HD, heat pump drying; VFD, vacuum freeze-drying; and BD, blast drying. Significant differences are shown by different letters in the same column, while no significant differences are indicated by the same letters (P ≥ 0.05). n = 10.
FIGURE 5Ultrastructural changes of asparagus-dried products under different drying methods.