| Literature DB >> 20054475 |
Eleftherios Papoulias1, Anastasios S Siomos1, Athanasios Koukounaras1, Dimitrios Gerasopoulos2, Evangelos Kazakis3.
Abstract
The effects of genetic, pre-harvest (season of harvest, spear diameter, spear portion and spear tip color) and post-harvest factors (storage and domestic preparation practices, e.g., peeling and cooking) on total phenolic, flavonoid and ascorbic acid content of white asparagus spears and their correlation with antioxidant capacity (DPPH and FRAP) were studied. Results showed that genetic material was important for the total phenolic content but not season of harvest, spear diameter or storage. Violet spear tips and apical spear portions showed the largest amount of total phenolics. Peeling did not affect total phenolics in fresh asparagus, whereas it reduced their content in stored asparagus, while cooking resulted in an increase in both fresh and stored asparagus. However, the soluble extract of total phenolics and flavonoids were minor and the missing significance of phenolics and flavonoids in antioxidant capacity of white asparagus spears depends on these small amounts.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; asparagus; color; cultivars; harvesting season; portion; spear thickness; storage; total phenolics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20054475 PMCID: PMC2801999 DOI: 10.3390/ijms10125370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Total phenolic (mg gallic acid equivalents/g f.w.), total flavonoid (mg rutin equivalents/g f.w.), ascorbic acid (mg/100 g f.w.) content, DPPH (mg ascorbic acid equivalents antioxidant capacity/100 g f.w.) and FRAP (μM/g f.w.) of eight cultivars of white asparagus spears.
| Darbella | 0.302 | b | 0.177 | b | 15.33 | cd | 5.26 | c | 15.88 | c |
| Dariana | 0.378 | a | 0.176 | b | 17.86 | b | 10.93 | a | 22.82 | ab |
| Darlisa | 0.341 | ab | 0.171 | b | 18.16 | b | 11.99 | a | 22.79 | ab |
| Darsiane | 0.311 | b | 0.169 | b | 20.19 | a | 8.76 | b | 17.17 | c |
| Grolim | 0.328 | b | 0.176 | b | 17.82 | b | 8.12 | b | 15.45 | c |
| Cipres | 0.325 | b | 0.185 | b | 17.28 | b | 6.51 | c | 18.50 | bc |
| Larac | 0.324 | b | 0.242 | a | 16.92 | bc | 9.01 | b | 25.10 | a |
| Steline | 0.328 | b | 0.181 | b | 14.10 | d | 6.28 | c | 19.29 | bc |
Each value is the mean of six replicates. Different letters at each column denote significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05).
Total phenolic (mg gallic acid equivalents/g f.w.), total flavonoid (mg rutin equivalents/g f.w.), ascorbic acid (mg/100 g f.w.) content, DPPH (mg ascorbic acid equivalents antioxidant capacity/100 g f.w.) and FRAP (μM/g f.w.) of white asparagus spears (cv. ‘Grolim’) during a 40-day harvesting period.
| 10 | 0.227 | 0.181 | b | 19.87 | ab | 4.67 | b | 17.13 | a |
| 20 | 0.262 | 0.221 | a | 20.76 | a | 4.77 | b | 16.59 | a |
| 30 | 0.312 | 0.131 | c | 18.94 | b | 6.99 | a | 10.14 | b |
| 40 | 0.274 | 0.177 | b | 18.78 | b | 7.61 | a | 11.42 | b |
Each value is the mean of three replicates. Different letters at each column denote significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05).
Total phenolic (mg gallic acid equivalents/g f.w.), total flavonoid (mg rutin equivalents/g f.w.), ascorbic acid (mg/100 g f.w.) content, DPPH (mg ascorbic acid equivalents antioxidant capacity/100 g f.w.) and FRAP (μM/g f.w.) of white asparagus spears (cv. ‘Grolim’) as affected by spear diameter.
| 12.0–15.9 | 0.259 | 0.156 | 21.55 | a | 6.17 | 13.70 |
| 16.0–19.9 | 0.251 | 0.179 | 19.33 | b | 6.14 | 14.28 |
| 20.0–23.9 | 0.236 | 0.172 | 16.83 | c | 5.44 | 14.98 |
| 24.0–27.9 | 0.251 | 0.152 | 16.00 | c | 6.39 | 14.56 |
Each data is the mean of six replicates. Different letters at each column denote significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05).
Total phenolic (mg gallic acid equivalents/g f.w.), total flavonoid (mg rutin equivalents/g f.w.), ascorbic acid (mg/100 g f.w.) content, DPPH (mg ascorbic acid equivalents antioxidant capacity/100 g f.w.) and FRAP (μM/g f.w.) of asparagus spears (cv. ‘Grolim’) as affected by spear tip color (white or violet) and spear portion: apical (0–7), middle (7–14) and basal (14–21 cm from the tip).
| White spears | ||||||||||
| 0–7 | 0.393 | b | 0.236 | b | 26.50 | b | 13.42 | b | 34.79 | b |
| 7–14 | 0.254 | c | 0.147 | c | 15.95 | cd | 6.23 | c | 13.85 | c |
| 14–21 | 0.266 | c | 0.139 | c | 15.03 | de | 4.99 | c | 14.75 | c |
| Violet spears | ||||||||||
| 0–7 | 0.502 | a | 0.430 | a | 35.17 | a | 22.38 | a | 68.33 | a |
| 7–14 | 0.206 | d | 0.161 | c | 16.74 | c | 5.73 | c | 12.37 | c |
| 14–21 | 0.244 | c | 0.157 | c | 14.60 | e | 5.52 | c | 13.89 | c |
Each value is the mean of six replicates. Different letters at each column denote significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05).
Total phenolic (mg gallic acid equivalents/g f.w.), total flavonoid (mg rutin equivalents/g f.w.), ascorbic acid (mg/100 g f.w.) content, DPPH (mg ascorbic acid equivalents antioxidant capacity/100 g f.w.) and FRAP (μM/g f.w.) of white asparagus spears (cv. ‘Grolim’) as affected by storage (for 0 or 6 days at 2 °C) and domestic preparation practices (peeling and cooking).
| Fresh spears | ||||||||||
| Unpeeled | 0.251 | cd | 0.179 | c | 19.33 | a | 6.14 | b | 14.28 | b |
| Peeled | 0.252 | cd | 0.202 | bc | 17.39 | b | 5.91 | b | 16.32 | b |
| Cooked | 0.329 | a | 0.230 | b | 16.76 | bc | 17.52 | a | 58.62 | a |
| Stored spears | ||||||||||
| Unpeeled | 0.288 | bc | 0.292 | a | 15.86 | c | 5.07 | b | 18.82 | b |
| Peeled | 0.247 | d | 0.194 | bc | 15.69 | c | 5.93 | b | 17.78 | b |
| Cooked | 0.324 | ab | 0.198 | bc | 16.43 | bc | 17.33 | a | 56.60 | a |
Each value is the mean of six replicates. Different letters at each column denote significant differences between means (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05).