Madan M Rehani1, Emily R Melick2, Raza M Alvi2, Ruhani Doda Khera2, Salma Batool-Anwar3, Tomas G Neilan2, Michael Bettmann4. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. madan.rehani@gmail.com. 2. Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 3. Brigham Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 4. Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine percent of patients without malignancy and ≤ 40 years of age with high cumulative radiation doses through recurrent CT exams and assess imaging appropriateness. METHODS: From the cohort of patients who received cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv over a 5-year period, a sub-set was identified with non-malignant disease. The top 50 clinical indications leading to multiple CTs were determined. Clinical decision support (CDS) system scores were analyzed using a widely adopted standard of 1-3 (red) as "not usually appropriate," 4-6 (yellow) "may or may not be appropriate," and 7-9 (green) "usually appropriate." Clinicians reviewed patient records to assess compliance with appropriate use criteria (AUC). RESULTS: 9.6% of patients in our series were with non-malignant conditions and 1.4% with age ≤ 40 years. CDS scores (rounded) were 2% red, 38% yellow, 27% green, and 33% unscored CTs. Clinical society guidelines for CT exams, wherever available, were followed in 87.5 to 100% of cases. AUCs were not available for several clinical indications as also referral guidelines for serial CT imaging. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease. CONCLUSIONS: We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age ≤ 40 years require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years but the radiation risk creates concern. There is a fair number of conditions for which AUC are not available. Suggested solutions include development of CT scanners with lesser radiation dose and further development of appropriateness criteria. KEY POINTS: We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age group 0-40 years and with non-malignant diagnosis require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease. Imaging guidelines and appropriateness use criteria are not available for many conditions. Wherever available, they are for initial work-up and diagnosis and there is a lack of guidance on serial CT imaging.
OBJECTIVE: To determine percent of patients without malignancy and ≤ 40 years of age with high cumulative radiation doses through recurrent CT exams and assess imaging appropriateness. METHODS: From the cohort of patients who received cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv over a 5-year period, a sub-set was identified with non-malignant disease. The top 50 clinical indications leading to multiple CTs were determined. Clinical decision support (CDS) system scores were analyzed using a widely adopted standard of 1-3 (red) as "not usually appropriate," 4-6 (yellow) "may or may not be appropriate," and 7-9 (green) "usually appropriate." Clinicians reviewed patient records to assess compliance with appropriate use criteria (AUC). RESULTS: 9.6% of patients in our series were with non-malignant conditions and 1.4% with age ≤ 40 years. CDS scores (rounded) were 2% red, 38% yellow, 27% green, and 33% unscored CTs. Clinical society guidelines for CT exams, wherever available, were followed in 87.5 to 100% of cases. AUCs were not available for several clinical indications as also referral guidelines for serial CT imaging. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease. CONCLUSIONS: We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age ≤ 40 years require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years but the radiation risk creates concern. There is a fair number of conditions for which AUC are not available. Suggested solutions include development of CT scanners with lesser radiation dose and further development of appropriateness criteria. KEY POINTS: We are faced with a situation wherein patients in age group 0-40 years and with non-malignant diagnosis require or are thought to require many CT exams over the course of a few years. More than half of CT exams were unrelated to follow-up of a primary chronic disease. Imaging guidelines and appropriateness use criteria are not available for many conditions. Wherever available, they are for initial work-up and diagnosis and there is a lack of guidance on serial CT imaging.
Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Yifei Wang; Thomas R Yellen-Nelson; Michelle Moghadassi; Nicole Wilson; Robert Gould; Anthony Seibert; John M Boone; Mayil Krishnam; Ramit Lamba; David J Hall; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Erika Schneider; Stacy Zelenka; Paul Grooff; Dan Alexa; Jennifer Bullen; Nancy A Obuchowski Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Naomi P O'Grady; Philip S Barie; John G Bartlett; Thomas Bleck; Karen Carroll; Andre C Kalil; Peter Linden; Dennis G Maki; David Nierman; William Pasculle; Henry Masur Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Angela M Mills; Ivan K Ip; Curtis P Langlotz; Ali S Raja; Hanna M Zafar; Ramin Khorasani Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.105