Literature DB >> 25622766

The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging.

Andrew K Moriarity1, Chad Klochko2, Matthew O'Brien2, Safwan Halabi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of integrating point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) using the ACR Appropriateness Criteria (AC) into an inpatient computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system for advanced imaging requests.
METHODS: Over 12 months, inpatient CPOE requests for nuclear medicine, CT, and MRI were processed by CDS to generate an AC score using provider-selected data from pull-down menus. During the second 6-month period, AC scores were displayed to ordering providers, and acknowledgement was required to finalize a request. Request AC scores and percentages of requests not scored by CDS were compared among primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists, and by years in practice of the responsible physician of record.
RESULTS: CDS prospectively generated a score for 26.0% and 30.3% of baseline and intervention requests, respectively. The average AC score increased slightly for all requests (7.2 ± 1.6 versus 7.4 ± 1.5; P < .001), for PCPs (6.9 ± 1.9 versus 7.4 ± 1.6; P < .001), and minimally for specialists (7.3 ± 1.6 versus 7.4 ± 1.5; P < .001). The percentage of requests lacking sufficient structured clinical information to generate an AC score decreased for all requests (73.1% versus 68.9%; P < .001), for PCPs (78.0% versus 71.7%; P < .001), and for specialists (72.9% versus 69.1%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Integrating CDS into inpatient CPOE slightly increased the overall AC score of advanced imaging requests as well as the provision of sufficient structured data to automatically generate AC scores. Both effects were more pronounced in PCPs compared with specialists.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Clinical decision support; appropriateness criteria; computerized physician order entry; utilization management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25622766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Quality metrics currently used in academic radiology departments: results of the QUALMET survey.

Authors:  Eric A Walker; Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas; Joseph S Fotos; Michael A Bruno
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Effects of an Electronic Medical Record Intervention on Appropriateness of Transthoracic Echocardiograms: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Weihan Chen; David T Saxon; Michael P Henry; John R Herald; Rob Holleman; Debbie Zawol; Stacy Sivils; Mohamad A Kenaan; Theodore J Kolias; Hitinder S Gurm; Nicole M Bhave
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Appropriateness of Head CT Scans at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Etsehiwot Demeke; Abebe Mekonnen
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Islam Y Elgendy; Ahmed Mahmoud; Jonathan J Shuster; Rami Doukky; David E Winchester
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Patients undergoing recurrent CT exams: assessment of patients with non-malignant diseases, reasons for imaging and imaging appropriateness.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Emily R Melick; Raza M Alvi; Ruhani Doda Khera; Salma Batool-Anwar; Tomas G Neilan; Michael Bettmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Improved Appropriateness of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging After Implementation of Clinical Decision Support Mechanism.

Authors:  Leonid L Chepelev; Xuan Wang; Benjamin Gold; Clara-Lea Bonzel; Frank Rybicki; Jennifer W Uyeda; Adnan Sheikh; Dan Anderson; Jared Lindaman; Greg Mogel; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Mary C Mahoney; Tianxi Cai; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Imaging Guidelines for Enhancing Justifications for Radiologic Studies.

Authors:  Woo Kyoung Jeong; Jung Hwan Baek; Seung Eun Jung; Kyung Hyun Do; Hwan Seok Yong; Min-Jeong Kim; Miyoung Choi; Min Lee; Sol Ji Choi; Ae Jeong Jo; Jin A Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  To what extent do hospitalised patients receive appropriate CT and MRI scans? Results of a cross-sectional study in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Aida Bianco; Rossella Zucco; Francesca Lotito; Maria Pavia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Evaluation of the appropriate use of chest CT-Scans in the diagnosis of hospitalized patients in shiraz teaching hospitals, Southern Iran.

Authors:  Ramiz Kamrani; Mohammad Javad Fallahi; Seyed Masoom Masoompour; Seiyed Mohammad Ali Ghayumi; Reza Jalli; Sepideh Khederzadeh; Amirhossein Erfani
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-08-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.