| Literature DB >> 31763433 |
I-Lun Huang1,2, Ming-Ting Wu1,2, Chin Hu3, Guang-Yuan Mar4, Ting-Yim Lee5,6, Aaron So6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR) measured from low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging with a whole-heart coverage CT scanner for detecting functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD).Entities:
Keywords: CT perfusion; Coronary artery disease; Large-coverage CT scanner; Myocardial perfusion reserve; Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763433 PMCID: PMC6859740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Fig. 1a. Protocol for rest and stress SPECT MPI with either (i) 201-Thallium or (ii) 99mTc-sestamibi tracers.
b. Protocol for CCTA and dynamic rest and stress CT MPI. Each black bar represents a prospective ECG triggered axial scan of the heart.
Summary of patient characteristics. Except for the physical measurements, the numbers in the table represent the number of patients and the numbers in the bracket denote the percentage of patients.
| Number of patient | 21 |
| Male/female | 18/3 |
| Age (years) | 59.0 ± 8.0 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 2.4 |
| Height (cm) | 164.8 ± 8.5 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.5 ± 8.8 |
| Coronary dominance | |
| Right | 18 (86%) |
| Left | 2 (10%) |
| Co | 1 (4%) |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | |
| Hypertension | 10 (48%) |
| Dyslipidemia | 9 (43%) |
| Diabetes | 5 (24%) |
| Family history of CAD | 1 (5%) |
| Smoking within the last year | 6 (29%) |
| CAD | |
| Single-vessel disease | 8 (38%) |
| Double-vessel disease | 5 (24%) |
| Triple-vessel disease | 2 (10%) |
| Prior myocardial infarction | 7 (33%) |
| Prior PCI | 12 (57%) |
| Prior Stent | 12 (57%) |
| Agatston coronary calcium score | 346.2 ± 412.1 |
| MESA risk score | 82.3 ± 17.8 |
Fig. 2a. This figure shows the case of a 55 y.o. male patient who had a positive treadmill test. The ICA test revealed that he had a single-vessel CAD with a totally occluded obtuse marginal branch (black arrow in iv). The SPECT perfusion maps in the short-axis and polar view revealed a perfusion defect in the basal and mid lateral wall (LCx territory, v). The CT stress perfusion maps in three short-axis slices (i to iii) also revealed ischemia in the lateral wall in the basal and mid slices.
b. This figure shows the case of a different 55 y.o. male patient who had exertional chest pain during exercise and was diabetic with a double-vessel CAD. The CCTA images showed that the proximal LAD segment was sub-totally occluded and the proximal LCx segment was 90% stenosed (black arrows in iv to vi), whereas the RCA artery was non-stenosed. The SPECT perfusion maps in the short-axis and polar view (vii) showed profound hypoperfusion in the lateral wall (LCx territory) and apical wall (LAD territory). The CT stress perfusion maps in three short-axis slices (i to iii) also showed intense hypoperfusion in approximately the same lateral and apical myocardial segments.
c. This figure shows the case of a 59 y.o. male patient who had a triple-vessel CAD and unstable angina. He had a prior myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and a stent was implanted in the proximal LAD artery about 17 months before his enrolment for this study. The ICA showed that the proximal and mid RCA segments were 70% and 99% stenosed respectively (black arrows in iv); the mid LAD segment was 60% stenosed, with additional 80% and 70% stenosis in the first and second diagonal branches respectively (black arrows in v); the distal LCx segment was totally occluded. The SPECT perfusion maps in the short-axis and polar view (vi) showed absence of or minimal hypoperfusion due to the “balanced” ischemia commonly seen in multi-vessel CAD. By contrast, the CT stress perfusion maps in three short-axis slices (i to iii) clearly showed ischemia in all three coronary territories.
Fig. 3a. Boxplot of rest and stress MBF in non-ischemic and ischemic myocardial segments.
b. Boxplot of MPR in non-ischemic and ischemic myocardial segments.
Fig. 4a. Scatter plot of MPR versus stress MBF for non-ischemic (green triangles) and ischemic (blue circles) myocardial segments.
b. ROC curves of stress MBF (dot line) and MPR (solid bold line) for the detection of functionally significant CAD.
Diagnostic performances of stress MBF (sMBF) and MPR and combined sMBF and MPR (sMBF+MPR) thresholds for detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis on a per-patient (top), per-vessel (middle) and per-segment (bottom) analysis.
| Patient-based | sMBF | MPR | sMBF+MPR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Value | 95% CI | Value | 95% CI | Value | 95% CI |
| Sensitivity (%) | 100.00 | 78.20 to 100.00 | 93.33 | 68.05 to 99.83 | 93.33 | 68.05 to 99.83 |
| Specificity (%) | 83.33 | 35.88 to 99.58 | 66.67 | 22.28 to 95.67 | 100.00 | 54.07 to 100.00 |
| PPV (%) | 93.75 | 71.48 to 98.90 | 87.50 | 69.13 to 95.63 | 100.00 | – |
| NPV (%) | 100.00 | – | 80.00 | 35.66 to 96.65 | 85.71 | 47.46 to 97.55 |
| Accuracy (%) | 95.24 | 76.18 to 99.88 | 85.71 | 63.66 to 96.95 | 95.24 | 76.18 to 99.88 |
Diagnostic performances of CCTA and combined CCTA and CTP (CCTA+CTP) for detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis on a per-patient (top) and per-vessel (bottom) analysis.
| Patient-based | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ACCURACY (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCTA ≥50% | 92.86 | 25.00 | 81.25 | 50.00 | 77.78 |
| CCTA ≥70% | 71.43 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 50.00 | 77.78 |
| sMBF | 100.00 | 75.00 | 93.33 | 100.00 | 94.44 |
| MPR | 92.86 | 50.00 | 86.67 | 66.67 | 83.33 |
| sMBF+MPR | 92.86 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 80.00 | 94.44 |
| CCTA+CTP | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Both sMBF and MPR thresholds were used in the CCTA+CTP assessment.