Literature DB >> 27013250

Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography.

Ibrahim Danad1, Jackie Szymonifka1, Joshua Schulman-Marcus, James K Min2.   

Abstract

Recent developments in computed tomography (CT) technology have fulfilled the prerequisites for the clinical application of myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) imaging. The evaluation of myocardial perfusion by CT can be achieved by static or dynamic scan acquisitions. Although both approaches have proved clinically feasible, substantial barriers need to be overcome before its routine clinical application. The current review provides an outline of the current status of CTP imaging and also focuses on disparities between static and dynamic CTPs for the evaluation of myocardial blood flow. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; dynamic; myocardial perfusion imaging; static; stress CT perfusion

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27013250      PMCID： PMC4955293          DOI： 10.1093/ehjci/jew044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN： 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  47 in total

1.  Myocardial CT perfusion imaging in a large animal model: comparison of dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions.

Authors:  Florian Schwarz; Rabea Hinkel; Elisabeth Baloch; Roy P Marcus; Kristof Hildebrandt; Torleif A Sandner; Christian Kupatt; Verena Hoffmann; Bernd J Wintersperger; Maximilian F Reiser; Daniel Theisen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-23

2.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Brian S Ko; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Michael Leung; Paul R Antonis; Arthur Nasis; Marcus Crossett; Sarah A Hope; Sam J Lehman; John Troupis; Tony DeFrance; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Leslee J Shaw; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; David S Fieno; Guido Germano; Nathan D Wong; Xingping Kang; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner; Robert Goetti; André Plass; Monika Wieser; Hans Scheffel; Christophe Wyss; Paul Stolzmann; Olivio Donati; Johannes Schnabl; Volkmar Falk; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Normal range and regional heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion in healthy human myocardium: assessment on dynamic perfusion CT using 128-slice dual-source CT.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Wook-Jin Chung; Yon Mi Sung; Sung Su Byun; Jae Hyung Park; Jeong Ho Kim; Jeonggeun Moon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study.

Authors:  Carlos E Rochitte; Richard T George; Marcus Y Chen; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Julie M Miller; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Kakuya Kitagawa; Shiro Nakamori; Roger Laham; Andrea L Vavere; Rodrigo J Cerci; Vishal C Mehra; Cesar Nomura; Klaus F Kofoed; Masahiro Jinzaki; Sachio Kuribayashi; Albert de Roos; Michael Laule; Swee Yaw Tan; John Hoe; Narinder Paul; Frank J Rybicki; Jeffery A Brinker; Andrew E Arai; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; Marcelo F Di Carli; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Wijnand J Stuijfzand; Valtteri Uusitalo; Tanja Kero; Ibrahim Danad; Mischa T Rijnierse; Antti Saraste; Pieter G Raijmakers; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Hans J Harms; Martijn W Heymans; Marc C Huisman; Koen M Marques; Sami A Kajander; Mikko Pietilä; Jens Sörensen; Niels van Royen; Juhani Knuuti; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.792

9.  CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR.

Authors:  Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Fabian Bamberg; Janine Tittus; Florian Schwarz; Melvin D'Anastasi; Roy P Marcus; Jan Schenzle; Christoph Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Alexander Becker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Coronary risk factors and myocardial blood flow in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: a quantitative [15O]H2O PET/CT study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; Yolande E Appelman; Hendrik J Harms; Stefan de Haan; Mijntje L P van den Oever; Cornelis van Kuijk; Cornelis P Allaart; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Mark Lubberink; Albert C van Rossum; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236
View more
  34 in total

1.  CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Csilla Celeng; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Imaging of coronary flow capacity: is there a role for dynamic CT perfusion imaging?

Authors:  Alexia Rossi; Giuseppe Ferrante
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography derived from low-dose dynamic CT myocardial perfusion: a feasibility study with comparison to invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Xu Dai; Mengmeng Yu; Jingwei Pan; Zhigang Lu; Chengxing Shen; Yining Wang; Bin Lu; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Imaging Techniques to Assess Microvascular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Roshin C Mathew; Jamieson M Bourque; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 5.  Selecting a CT scanner for cardiac imaging: the heart of the matter.

Authors:  Maria A Lewis; Ana Pascoal; Stephen F Keevil; Cornelius A Lewis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET.

Authors:  Roberto Nery Dantas; Antonildes Nascimento Assuncao; Ismar Aguiar Marques; Mateus Guimaraes Fahel; Cesar Higa Nomura; Luiz Francisco Rodrigues Avila; Maria Clementina Pinto Giorgi; Jose Soares; Jose Claudio Meneghetti; Jose Rodrigues Parga
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Sara Seitun; Alberto Clemente; Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Giuseppe Runza; Massimo Midiri; Erica Maffei
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

8.  PATIENT-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES IN DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION EXAMINATION.

Authors:  V-M Sundell; M Kortesniemi; T Siiskonen; A Kosunen; S Rosendahl; L Büermann
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Myocardial perfusion assessment in the infarct core and penumbra zones in an in-vivo porcine model of the acute, sub-acute, and chronic infarction.

Authors:  Meng-Xi Yang; Hua-Yan Xu; Lu Zhang; Lin Chen; Rong Xu; Hang Fu; Hui Liu; Xue-Sheng Li; Chuan Fu; Ke-Ling Liu; Hong Li; Xiao-Yue Zhou; Ying-Kun Guo; Zhi-Gang Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Coronary circulation: Pressure/flow parameters for assessment of ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.952
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.