Literature DB >> 20537493

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

Nico H J Pijls1, William F Fearon, Pim A L Tonino, Uwe Siebert, Fumiaki Ikeno, Bernhard Bornschein, Marcel van't Veer, Volker Klauss, Ganesh Manoharan, Thomas Engstrøm, Keith G Oldroyd, Peter N Ver Lee, Philip A MacCarthy, Bernard De Bruyne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the 2-year outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: In patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI, coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding stent placement. The FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study showed that routine FFR in addition to angiography improves outcomes of PCI at 1 year. It is unknown if these favorable results are maintained at 2 years of follow-up.
METHODS: At 20 U.S. and European medical centers, 1,005 patients with multivessel CAD were randomly assigned to PCI with drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified based on their angiographic appearance. Patients randomized to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those randomized to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was <or=0.80.
RESULTS: The number of indicated lesions was 2.7+/-0.9 in the angiography-guided group and 2.8+/-1.0 in the FFR-guided group (p=0.34). The number of stents used was 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.9+/-1.3, respectively (p<0.001). The 2-year rates of mortality or myocardial infarction were 12.9% in the angiography-guided group and 8.4% in the FFR-guided group (p=0.02). Rates of PCI or coronary artery bypass surgery were 12.7% and 10.6%, respectively (p=0.30). Combined rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization were 22.4% and 17.9%, respectively (p=0.08). For lesions deferred on the basis of FFR>0.80, the rate of myocardial infarction was 0.2% and the rate of revascularization was 3.2 % after 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces mortality and myocardial infarction at 2 years when compared with standard angiography-guided PCI. (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation [FAME]; NCT00267774). Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537493     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  255 in total

Review 1.  PET measurement of adenosine stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow for physiological assessment of the coronary circulation.

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Stress CT perfusion: coupling coronary anatomy with physiology.

Authors:  Edward A Hulten; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Brian Ghoshhajra; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Coronary CT angiography after stress testing: an efficient use of resources? Implications of the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium (ACIC) results.

Authors:  Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Gilbert L Raff; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Coronary artery disease: Percent stenosis in CAD--a flaw in current practice.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Fractional flow reserve application in everyday practice: adherence to clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Katia Orvin; Tamir Bental; Alon Eisen; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Abid Assali; Eli I Lev; David Brosh; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-09

Review 8.  Coronary Angiography With Pressure Wire and Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Luise Gaede; Helge Möllmann; Tanja Rudolph; Johannes Rieber; Florian Boenner; Monique Tröbs
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  Myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kohichiro Iwasaki
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-26

10.  Current status of cardiac CT for the detection of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  A Schuhbäck; M Marwan; R C Cury; S Achenbach
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.