| Literature DB >> 31591410 |
O Nicolitch1,2, M Feucherolles1, J-L Churin1, L Fauchery1, M-P Turpault2, S Uroz3,4.
Abstract
The access and recycling of the base cations are essential processes for the long-lasting functioning of forest ecosystems. While the role of soil bacterial communities has been demonstrated in mineral weathering and tree nutrition, our understanding of the link between the availability of base cations and the functioning of these communities remains limited. To fill this gap, we developed a microcosm approach to investigate how an increase in key base cations (potassium or magnesium) impacted the taxonomic and functional structures of the bacterial communities. During a 2-month period after fertilization with available potassium or magnesium, soil properties, global functions (metabolic potentials and respiration) as well as mineral weathering bioassays and 16S rRNA amplicon pyrosequencing were monitored. Our analyses showed no or small variations in the taxonomic structure, total densities and global functions between the treatments. In contrast, a decrease in the frequency and effectiveness of mineral weathering bacteria was observed in the fertilized treatments. Notably, quantitative PCR targeting specific genera known for their mineral weathering ability (i.e., Burkholderia and Collimonas) confirmed this decrease. These new results suggest that K and Mg cation availability drives the distribution of the mineral weathering bacterial communities in forest soil.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31591410 PMCID: PMC6779897 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50730-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Chemical characteristics of the soil samples collected among the three treatments (control, K and Mg fertilized) and the three sampling times (T0, T1 and T3).
| Time | Treatment | K | Ca | Fe | Mg | Mn | Na | Al3+ | H+ | CEC | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cmol+ kg−1 of soil | |||||||||||
| T0 | Ct | 0.12 | 0.29 | 0.0029 | 0.077 | 0.21 | 0.067 | 2.25 | 0.14 | 3.17 | 4.65 |
| T1 | Ct | 0.12a | 0.29 | 0.0030 | 0.077a | 0.20a | 0.040 | 2.29a | 0.13 | 3.15 | 4.66 |
| +K | 0.28b | 0.16 | 0.0023 | 0.047a | 0.23b | 0.038 | 2.19b | 0.13 | 3.07 | 4.60 | |
| +Mg | 0.12a | 0.21 | 0.0024 | 0.39b | 0.23b | 0.025 | 2.11c | 0.12 | 3.20 | 4.56 | |
| Stat | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.89 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.06 | |||||
| T3 | Ct | 0.12a | 0.26 | 0.0024 | 0.07a | 0.21a | 0.003 | 2.29a | 0.12 | 3.06 | 4.64 |
| +K | 0.27b | 0.17 | 0.0024 | 0.048a | 0.23ab | 0.043 | 2.20b | 0.11 | 3.06 | 4.6 | |
| +Mg | 0.12a | 0.26 | 0.0021 | 0.45b | 0.25b | 0.043 | 1.98c | 0.10 | 3.29 | 4.59 | |
| Stat | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.11 | |||||
The quantities of exchangeable elements and the CEC are expressed in cmol of charge per kg of soil. CEC: cation exchange capacity. The data presented are mean values of 3 replicates. Different letters (a, b, c) indicated significant differences between treatments calculated for the sampling times T1 and T3 separately, according to a one-factor ANOVA analysis followed by a Tukey test (P < 0.05). Significantly higher values were indicated in bold. For legibility reasons, the standard error values are not presented.
Bacterial quantification and ratio analyses.
| Treatment | Culture | qPCR | (Ratio) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total bacteria | Total bacteria |
|
|
| T/B | T/C | T/P | |
| T1-Ct | 6.50a | 7.94a | 6.06a | 6.03d | 6.03a | 76.63b | 86.80a | 81.93a |
| T1 + K | 6.38a | 7.77a | 5.49b | 5.47ab | 5.56a | 191.67a | 204.67ab | 234.97a |
| T1 + Mg | 6.11a | 7.68a | 5.52b | 5.31abc | 5.38b | 150.27ab | 249.67ab | 207.33a |
| T3-Ct | 6.42a | 7.59a | 5.74b | 5.71ad | 5.44b | 80.10b | 79.83a | 150.67a |
| T3 + K | 6.06a | 7.75a | 5.58b | 5.07bc | 5.40b | 150.00ab | 494.33ab | 224.00a |
| T3 + Mg | 6.11a | 7.74a | 5.51b | 4.93c | 5.52b | 170.67a | 717.33b | 173.00a |
Quantification done by dilution/plating or quantitative PCR are expressed as Log[cfu g−1 of soil] and Log[16S rRNA gene copies g−1 of soil], respectively. The data presented are mean values of 3 replicates. Ratio analyses (i.e., T/B: ratio Total bacteria/Burkholderia; T/P: ratio Total bacteria/Pseudomonas; T/C: ratio Total bacteria/Collimonas) have been done on the non-log transformed data. Treatments presenting different letters (a,b,c,d) are significantly different according to a one-factor ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test (P < 0.05). Treatments are presented as follows: Ct, control; +Mg, Mg fertilized and +k, K fertilized. For legibility reasons, the standard error values are not presented.
Figure 1Relative mineral weathering effectiveness of the bacteria according to the treatment (control, K fertilized and Mg fertilized) and the sampling time (T0, T1 and T3). (A) Relative effectiveness at mobilizing iron and (B) Relative effectiveness at solubilizing inorganic phosphorus. For each bar, the data presented are mean +/− Standard deviation. The error bars indicate standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a or b) indicate significant differences between treatments in one sampling time. Statistics were obtained according to a one- factor ANOVA followed by a Tukey test (P < 0.05). A total of 412 and 357 bacterial strains have been tested on the TCP and CAS media, respectively. Each strain was tested with 3 replicates.
Figure 2Distribution in classes of mineral weathering effectiveness of the bacteria depending on the treatment (control, K fertilized and Mg fertilized) and on the sampling time (T0, T1 and T3). (A) Iron mobilizing ability and (B) Inorganic phosphorus solubilizing ability. For each bioassay, determination of the class of effectiveness was done depending on the median (M) of the discoloration zones of the positive strains (black: strong activity, discoloration zone > M; grey: moderate activity, discoloration zone < M; white: no degradation activity). Capital letters (A,B or C) indicate significant differences between the sampling times, within one treatment. Lowercase letters (a,b of c) indicate significant differences between the treatments, within one sampling time. Statistics were obtained according to a Chi2 test (P < 0.05). A total of 412 and 357 bacterial strains have been tested on the TCP and CAS media, respectively. Each strain was tested with 3 replicates.
Figure 3Relationship between mineral weathering effectiveness and taxonomic affiliation of the bacteria. For each bacterial genus represented by a minimum of 10 isolates, the relative effectiveness to: (A) mobilize iron and (B) solubilize inorganic phosphorus is presented, whatever the origin of the bacterial isolates. For each bar, the data presented are mean +/− Standard deviation. The error bars indicate standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a–c or d) indicate significant differences between genus effectiveness. Statistics were obtained according to a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey test (P < 0.05). The number of bacterial isolates tested per genus is presented into the bars.