Literature DB >> 17601128

Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

Noah Fierer1, Mark A Bradford, Robert B Jackson.   

Abstract

Although researchers have begun cataloging the incredible diversity of bacteria found in soil, we are largely unable to interpret this information in an ecological context, including which groups of bacteria are most abundant in different soils and why. With this study, we examined how the abundances of major soil bacterial phyla correspond to the biotic and abiotic characteristics of the soil environment to determine if they can be divided into ecologically meaningful categories. To do this, we collected 71 unique soil samples from a wide range of ecosystems across North America and looked for relationships between soil properties and the relative abundances of six dominant bacterial phyla (Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, alpha-Proteobacteria, and the beta-Proteobacteria). Of the soil properties measured, net carbon (C) mineralization rate (an index of C availability) was the best predictor of phylum-level abundances. There was a negative correlation between Acidobacteria abundance and C mineralization rates (r2 = 0.26, P < 0.001), while the abundances of beta-Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were positively correlated with C mineralization rates (r2 = 0.35, P < 0.001 and r2 = 0.34, P < 0.001, respectively). These patterns were explored further using both experimental and meta-analytical approaches. We amended soil cores from a specific site with varying levels of sucrose over a 12-month period to maintain a gradient of elevated C availabilities. This experiment confirmed our survey results: there was a negative relationship between C amendment level and the abundance of Acidobacteria (r2 = 0.42, P < 0.01) and a positive relationship for both Bacteroidetes and beta-Proteobacteria (r2 = 0.38 and 0.70, respectively; P < 0.01 for each). Further support for a relationship between the relative abundances of these bacterial phyla and C availability was garnered from an analysis of published bacterial clone libraries from bulk and rhizosphere soils. Together our survey, experimental, and meta-analytical results suggest that certain bacterial phyla can be differentiated into copiotrophic and oligotrophic categories that correspond to the r- and K-selected categories used to describe the ecological attributes of plants and animals. By applying the copiotroph-oligotroph concept to soil microorganisms we can make specific predictions about the ecological attributes of various bacterial taxa and better understand the structure and function of soil bacterial communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601128     DOI: 10.1890/05-1839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  686 in total

1.  13,16-Dimethyl octacosanedioic acid (iso-diabolic acid), a common membrane-spanning lipid of Acidobacteria subdivisions 1 and 3.

Authors:  Jaap S Sinninghe Damsté; W Irene C Rijpstra; Ellen C Hopmans; Johan W H Weijers; Bärbel U Foesel; Jörg Overmann; Svetlana N Dedysh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities.

Authors:  James C Stegen; Xueju Lin; Allan E Konopka; James K Fredrickson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Recovery of as-yet-uncultured soil acidobacteria on dilute solid media.

Authors:  Isabelle F George; Manuela Hartmann; Mark R Liles; Spiros N Agathos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Distinctive bacterial communities in the rhizoplane of four tropical tree species.

Authors:  Yoon Myung Oh; Mincheol Kim; Larisa Lee-Cruz; Ang Lai-Hoe; Rusea Go; N Ainuddin; Raha Abdul Rahim; Noraini Shukor; Jonathan M Adams
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Soil microbial abundance and diversity along a low precipitation gradient.

Authors:  Ami Bachar; Ashraf Al-Ashhab; M Ines M Soares; Menachem Y Sklarz; Roey Angel; Eugene D Ungar; Osnat Gillor
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  In situ dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of soil bacterial communities under different crop residue management.

Authors:  Noémie Pascault; Bernard Nicolardot; Fabiola Bastian; Pascal Thiébeau; Lionel Ranjard; Pierre-Alain Maron
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks.

Authors:  Laurent Philippot; Siv G E Andersson; Tom J Battin; James I Prosser; Joshua P Schimel; William B Whitman; Sara Hallin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Bacterial biodiversity from Roopkund Glacier, Himalayan mountain ranges, India.

Authors:  Suman Pradhan; T N R Srinivas; Pavan Kumar Pindi; K Hara Kishore; Z Begum; Pawan Kumar Singh; Ashish Kumar Singh; M S Pratibha; Arun K Yasala; G S N Reddy; S Shivaji
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Impacts of Repeated Glyphosate Use on Wheat-Associated Bacteria Are Small and Depend on Glyphosate Use History.

Authors:  Daniel C Schlatter; Chuntao Yin; Scot Hulbert; Ian Burke; Timothy Paulitz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Predictable bacterial composition and hydrocarbon degradation in Arctic soils following diesel and nutrient disturbance.

Authors:  Terrence H Bell; Etienne Yergeau; Christine Maynard; David Juck; Lyle G Whyte; Charles W Greer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.