Literature DB >> 31555965

Effect of surgical factors on the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation by a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite.

Haolin Sun1,2, Chun Liu3, Shunlun Chen1, Yanjie Bai4, Huilin Yang3,2, Chunde Li5, Lei Yang6,7,8.   

Abstract

Bone cement-augmented pedicle screw system demonstrates great efficacy in spinal disease treatments. However, the intrinsic drawbacks associated with clinically used polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement demands for new bone cement formulations. On the basis of our previous studies, a novel injectable and biodegradable calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite (CPN) for the augmentation of pedicle screw fixation was systematically evaluated for its surgical feasibility and biomechanical performance by simulated and animal osteoporotic bone models, and the results were compared with those of clinical PMMA cement. ASTM-standard solid foam and open-cell foam models and decalcified sheep vertebra models were employed to evaluate the augmentation effects of CPN on bone tissue and on the cement-injected cannulated pedicle screws (CICPs) placed in osteoporotic bone. Surgical factors in CICPs application, such as injection force, tapping technique, screw diameter, and pedicle screw loosening scenarios, were studied in comparison with those in PMMA. When directly injected to the solid foam model, CPN revealed an identical augmentation effect to that of PMMA, as shown by the similar compressive strengths (0.73 ± 0.04 MPa for CPN group vs. 0.79 ± 0.02 MPa for PMMA group). The average injection force of CPN at approximately 40-50 N was higher than that of PMMA at approximately 20 N. Although both values are acceptable to surgeons, CPN revealed a more consistent injection force pattern than did PMMA. The dispersing and anti-pullout ability of CPN were not affected by the surgical factors of tapping technique and screw diameter. The axial pullout strength of CPN evaluated by the decalcified sheep vertebra model revealed a similar augmentation level as that of PMMA (1351.6 ± 324.2 N for CPN vs. 1459.7 ± 304.4 N for PMMA). The promising results of CPN clearly suggest its potential for replacing PMMA in CICPs augmentation application and the benefits of further study and development for clinical uses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone cement; calcium phosphate; degenerative spinal diseases; injectable; pedicle screw

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31555965     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-019-0710-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   4.592


  25 in total

1.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Patrick W Hitchon; Matthew D Brenton; Justin K Coppes; Aaron M From; James C Torner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.

Authors:  Ching-Chi Hsu; Ching-Kong Chao; Jaw-Lin Wang; Sheng-Mou Hou; Ying-Tsung Tsai; Jinn Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-12-19       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability.

Authors:  Da Liu; Jun Sheng; Hong-Hua Wu; Xia Kang; Qing-Yun Xie; Yang Luo; Jiang-Jun Zhou; Wei Zheng
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2018-12-01

4.  Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.

Authors:  Dar-Ming Lai; Yu-Tang Shih; Yi-Hsing Chen; Andy Chien; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients: prospective study using cannulated cemented pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Angel R Piñera; Camen Duran; Belen Lopez; Isabel Saez; Emmanuel Correia; Luis Alvarez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel fenestrated pedicle screw augmented with bone cement in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  Philippe E Paré; James L Chappuis; Raja Rampersaud; Amit O Agarwala; Joseph H Perra; Serkan Erkan; Chunhui Wu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; David Volkheimer; Sandra Reitmaier; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  [Bone cements based on polymethylmethacrylate].

Authors:  S J Breusch; K-D Kühn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine : a three-year follow-up of 37 patients.

Authors:  Bong Ju Moon; Bo Young Cho; Eun Young Choi; Ho Yeol Zhang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-10-31

10.  Strategy for salvage pedicle screw placement: A technical note.

Authors:  Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Masashi Neo; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  A Novel Calcium Phosphate-Based Nanocomposite for Augmentation of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Chun Liu; Huiling Liu; Haoyong Fu; Chunde Li; Lei Yang; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-07-09

2.  Selective cement augmentation of cranial and caudal pedicle screws provides comparable stability to augmentation on all segments in the osteoporotic spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Zhi Guo; Dan-Qing Guo; Yong-Chao Tang; Shun-Cong Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

3.  The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Lei Yang; Chunde Li; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.