Literature DB >> 25616349

Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

Fabio Galbusera1, David Volkheimer, Sandra Reitmaier, Nikolaus Berger-Roscher, Annette Kienle, Hans-Joachim Wilke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Literature studies showed a very wide range of pedicle screw loosening rates after thoracolumbar stabilization, ranging from less than 1 to 15 % in non-osteoporotic patients treated with rigid systems and even higher in osteoporotic subjects or patients treated with dynamic systems. Firstly, this paper aims to investigate how much this complication is affecting the success rate of pedicle screw fixation, in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic patients, and to discuss the biomechanical reasons which may be related to the variability of the rates found in the literature. The secondary aim was to summarize and discuss the published definitions and conventions about screw loosening from a clinical and radiological point of view.
METHODS: Narrative literature review.
RESULTS: Screw loosening appears to be a minor problem for fixation and fusion of healthy, non-osteoporotic bone. Pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic bone is believed to be at risk of loosening, but clinical data are actually scarce. Both expandable and augmented screws may be a viable option to reduce the risk of loosening, but clinical evidence is missing. Posterior motion-preserving implants seems to have a significant risk of screw loosening. Standardization appears to be lacking regarding the radiological assessment. Marked differences in the loosening rates found based either on planar radiography or on CT scanning were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Reported loosening rates primarily depended on the protocol used for the clinical examination during follow-up and on the conventions used for the radiological assessment. Aiming to a better comparability of published data, we recommend the authors of clinical studies to describe which criteria were used to assess a loosened screw, as well as the protocol of the clinical follow-up examination. Low-dose CT should be used for the assessment of screw loosening whenever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25616349     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  79 in total

1.  The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone.

Authors:  J Schatzker; J G Horne; G Sumner-Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The significance of radiolucent zones surrounding pedicle screws. Definition of screw loosening in spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  B Sandén; C Olerud; M Petrén-Mallmin; C Johansson; S Larsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

3.  Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Lawrence G Lenke; Michael F O'Brien; Ronald A Lehman; David W Polly; Teresa M Schroeder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs.

Authors:  Vidyadhar V Upasani; Christine L Farnsworth; Tucker Tomlinson; Reid C Chambers; Shunji Tsutsui; Michael A Slivka; Andrew T Mahar; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Early complications of spinal pedicle screw.

Authors:  A A Faraj; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Aseptic loosening of pedicle screw as a result of metal wear debris in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Sergiu Botolin; Conor Merritt; Mark Erickson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  How frequently do the results from completed US clinical trials enter the public domain?--A statistical analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Authors:  Hiroki Saito; Christopher J Gill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status.

Authors:  Thomas M Shea; Jake Laun; Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-08-24
View more
  81 in total

1.  Effect of surgical factors on the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation by a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite.

Authors:  Haolin Sun; Chun Liu; Shunlun Chen; Yanjie Bai; Huilin Yang; Chunde Li; Lei Yang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Pedicle screw loosening is correlated to chronic subclinical deep implant infection: a retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Leitner; Isabella Malaj; Patrick Sadoghi; Florian Amerstorfer; Mathias Glehr; Klaus Vander; Andreas Leithner; Roman Radl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Dominik Kaiser; David Volkheimer; Carsten Hackenbroch; Klaus Püschel; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Instrumented Spinal Stabilization without Fusion for Spinal Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Dori Drakhshandeh; James A Miller; Andrew J Fabiano
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Time to augment?! Impact of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation strength depending on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Gerd Huber; Kay Sellenschloh; Lennart Viezens; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard A Lindtner; Rene Schmid; Thomas Nydegger; Marko Konschake; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: a retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws.

Authors:  Hui-Zhi Guo; Yong-Chao Tang; Dan-Qing Guo; Shun-Cong Zhang; Yong-Xian Li; Guo-Ye Mo; Pei-Jie Luo; Ten-Peng Zhou; Yan-Huai Ma; Xiao-Bing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Cortical threaded pedicle screw improves fatigue strength in decreased bone quality.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Lennart Viezens; Wolfgang Lehmann; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  One and two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using an expandable, stand-alone, interbody fusion device: a VariLift® case series.

Authors:  Rebecca Barrett-Tuck; Diana Del Monaco; Jon E Block
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.