Literature DB >> 19893717

Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine : a three-year follow-up of 37 patients.

Bong Ju Moon1, Bo Young Cho, Eun Young Choi, Ho Yeol Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy, radiological findings, clinical outcomes and complications in patients with lumbar stenosis and osteoporosis after the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation of a cannulated pedicle screw.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with degenerative spinal stenosis and osteoporosis (T-score < -2.5) underwent lumbar fusion using the Dream Technology Pedicle Screw (DTPS, Dream Spine Total Solutions, Dream STS, Seoul, Korea) between 2005 and 2007. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Prolo scale. Radiologic findings were documented through computed tomography (CT) and plain films.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were evaluated and included, 2 males and 35 females with an average bone mineral density (BMD) of 0.47g/cm(2). The average age of the patients was 68.7 (range, 57-88). The preoperative VAS for low back and leg pain (7.87 +/- 0.95 and 8.82 +/- 0.83) were higher as compared with postoperative VAS (2.30 +/- 1.61 and 1.42 +/- 0.73) with statistical significance (p = 0.006, p = 0.003). According to the Prolo scale, 11, 22, one and three patients were in excellent, good, fair and poor conditions, respectively. The average amount of the injected cement per one cannulated screw was 1.83 +/- 0.11 mL.
CONCLUSION: The results show favorable outcome both clinically and radiographically for 37 patients who underwent lumbar fusion using DTPS and PMMA. Based on the results, the use of this surgical method can be a safe and effective option for the operation on the osteoporotic spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar stenosis; Osteoporosis; PMMA; Pedicle screw

Year:  2009        PMID: 19893717      PMCID: PMC2773385          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.4.305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  47 in total

1.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  M R Zindrick; L L Wiltse; E H Widell; J C Thomas; W R Holland; B T Field; C W Spencer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Segmental spine plates with pedicle screw fixation. A new internal fixation device for disorders of the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  A D Steffee; R S Biscup; D J Sitkowski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions.

Authors:  D J Prolo; S A Oklund; M Butcher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Acrylic cement stabilized joint replacements.

Authors:  M R Urist
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  S Soshi; R Shiba; H Kondo; K Murota
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions.

Authors:  R H Wittenberg; M Shea; D E Swartz; K S Lee; A A White; W C Hayes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparative biomechanical analysis of an improved novel pedicle screw with sheath and bone cement.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takigawa; Masato Tanaka; Hitoshi Konishi; Hisanori Ikuma; Haruo Misawa; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Kazuo Nakanishi; Koichi Kuramoto; Keiichiro Nishida; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-08

9.  Techniques of internal fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  J P Kostuik; T J Errico; T F Gleason
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Pullout strength of fixation screws from polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

Authors:  C M Flahiff; G A Gober; R W Nicholas
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  23 in total

1.  A case of pedicle screw loosening treated by modified transpedicular screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Seung Won Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-01-31

2.  Effect of surgical factors on the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation by a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite.

Authors:  Haolin Sun; Chun Liu; Shunlun Chen; Yanjie Bai; Huilin Yang; Chunde Li; Lei Yang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Osteoporosis and the Management of Spinal Degenerative Disease (I).

Authors:  Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Angel R Piñera; Luis Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

4.  [Augmented posterior instrumentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].

Authors:  D Krappinger; T J Kastenberger; R Schmid
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Pulmonary cement embolism following cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screw fixation in adult spinal deformity patients with severe osteoporosis (analysis of 2978 fenestrated screws).

Authors:  Onur Levent Ulusoy; Sinan Kahraman; Isik Karalok; Emel Kaya; Meric Enercan; Cem Sever; Burak Abay; Selhan Karadereler; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of the pedicle screw: the cement distribution in the vertebral body.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Hu; Hung Ta H Wu; Ming-Chau Chang; Wing-Kuang Yu; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Schleifenbaum; C Pfeifle; C Oefner; M Edel; N von der Höh; C-E Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  [Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in treatment of senile thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis].

Authors:  Qingda Li; Hao Chen; Tuanjiang Liu; Limin He; Peng Liu; Yuanting Zhao; Jinpeng Du; Peng Zou; Zhengping Zhang; Baorong He; Junsong Yang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-15

9.  Comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical and interfacial evaluations.

Authors:  Da Liu; Yi Zhang; Bo Zhang; Qing-yun Xie; Cai-ru Wang; Jin-biao Liu; Dong-fa Liao; Kai Jiang; Wei Lei; Xian-ming Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Percutaneous cement-augmented screws fixation in the fractures of the aging spine: is it the solution?

Authors:  Sébastien Pesenti; Benjamin Blondel; Emilie Peltier; Tarek Adetchessi; Henry Dufour; Stéphane Fuentes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.