Literature DB >> 21850421

Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients: prospective study using cannulated cemented pedicle screw instrumentation.

Angel R Piñera1, Camen Duran, Belen Lopez, Isabel Saez, Emmanuel Correia, Luis Alvarez.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar fusion in elderly patients is increasingly common. This study prospectively investigated the clinical and radiological outcome of osteoporotic patients >70 years with degenerative lumbar instability treated with fusion using a new cannulated, cemented, pedicle screw instrumentation augmented with PMMA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surgical protocols, patient records, densitometry, imaging studies, and pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome questionnaires of 23 patients (mean age, 77 years) with a follow-up of 20-49 months were reviewed. All patients underwent postoperative 3D CT scan control to assess cement leakage and instrumentation position. Serial radiological controls were analyzed for secondary complications, i.e., adjacent fractures, hardware mobilization and radiological evidence of fusion.
RESULTS: Pain and function improved at 6 months and were maintained at the final follow-up. No clinical complications secondary to PMMA leakage developed. No clinical or radiological cases of non-union were observed with a mean of 1.8 levels fused. No fractures occurred in adjacent segments. There were four cases of adjacent disc disease. Three deep infections required surgical revision without removal of material and one superficial infection, all with complete remission.
CONCLUSION: This new instrumentation for degenerative lumbar disease in elderly patients is safe and effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21850421      PMCID: PMC3175826          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1907-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade.

Authors:  Christopher S Raffo; William C Lauerman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer; Ferran Pellisé; Oscar Escudero; Luis Alvarez; Angels Pont; Jordi Alonso; Richard Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?

Authors:  D W Polly; J R Orchowski; R G Ellenbogen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members.

Authors:  S I Esses; B L Sachs; V Dreyzin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; Georgia Stobbs; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Symptoms and signs in degeneration of the lumbar spine. A prospective, consecutive study of 300 operated patients.

Authors:  B Jönsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-05

7.  Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength.

Authors:  R H Wittenberg; K S Lee; M Shea; A A White; W C Hayes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Ivan Broger; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anita A Uppin; Joshua A Hirsch; Luis V Centenera; Bernard A Pfiefer; Artemis G Pazianos; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Juay-Seng Tan; Brian K Kwon; Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effect of surgical factors on the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation by a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite.

Authors:  Haolin Sun; Chun Liu; Shunlun Chen; Yanjie Bai; Huilin Yang; Chunde Li; Lei Yang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Analysis of bone cement distribution around fenestrated pedicle screws in low bone quality lumbosacral vertebrae.

Authors:  Sergio Gómez González; Gerard Cabestany Bastida; Maria Daniela Vlad; José López López; Pablo Buenestado Caballero; Luis Alvarez-Galovich; Maria Rodríguez-Arguisjuela; Enrique Fernández Aguado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Osteoporosis and the Management of Spinal Degenerative Disease (I).

Authors:  Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Angel R Piñera; Luis Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

4.  Cement-augmented screws in a cervical two-level corpectomy with anterior titanium mesh cage reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Anja Tschugg; Johannes Paesold; Pujan Kavakebi; Werner Schmölz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Simplified Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Nicolas Plais; Charles Mengis; Jesús Manuel Gallego Bustos; Felix Tomé-Bermejo; Alejandro Peiro-Garcia; America Novoa Buitrago; Luis Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

7.  Different pedicle osteosynthesis for thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Massimo Girardo; Alessandro Rava; Federico Fusini; Giosuè Gargiulo; Angela Coniglio; Pasquale Cinnella
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Screw augmentation for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spine deformities: technical note.

Authors:  Arnaud Dubory; Manon Bachy; Houssam Bouloussa; Aurélien Courvoisier; Baptiste Morel; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Schleifenbaum; C Pfeifle; C Oefner; M Edel; N von der Höh; C-E Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Risk Factors for Adjacent Fractures After Cement-Augmented Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.

Authors:  Falko Schwarz; Michaela Burckhart; Aaron Lawson McLean; Rolf Kalff; Albrecht Waschke
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.