P Mittmann1, G Lauer2, A Ernst2, S Mutze3, F Hassepass4, S Arndt4, D Arweiler-Harbeck5, F Christov5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology At Ukb, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warener Str.7, 12683, Berlin, Germany. philipp.mittmann@googlemail.com. 2. Department of Otolaryngology At Ukb, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warener Str.7, 12683, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology, Ukb Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 5. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: It is important for the surgeon to determine the position of the CI electrode array during and after its placement within the cochlea. Most preferably, this should be within the scala tympani to obtain the best audiological outcome. Thus, misplacement into the scala vestibuli or tip fold-over should be prevented. Since there are different ways to ensure proper positioning of the electrode array within the scala tympani (e.g., intraoperative radiography, electrophysiological recordings), our study was aimed at detecting intraoperative electrophysiologic characteristics to better understand the mechanisms of those electrode tip fold-overs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a multi-centric, retrospective case-control series, patients with a postoperatively by radiography detected tip fold-over in perimodiolar electrodes were included. The point of fold-over (i.e., the electrode position) was determined and the intraoperative Auto-NRT recordings were analysed and evaluated. RESULTS: Four patients were found to have an electrode tip fold-over (out of 85 implantees). Significant changes of the Auto-NRT recordings were not detected. All tip fold-overs occurred in the most apical part of the electrodes. DISCUSSION: Cochlear implantation for hearing impaired patients plays a decisive role in modern auditory rehabilitation. Perimodiolar electrode arrays may fold over during the insertion and, hence, could have a negative impact on audiological outcome. Characteristic electrophysiologic changes to possibly predict this were not found in our series.
PURPOSE: It is important for the surgeon to determine the position of the CI electrode array during and after its placement within the cochlea. Most preferably, this should be within the scala tympani to obtain the best audiological outcome. Thus, misplacement into the scala vestibuli or tip fold-over should be prevented. Since there are different ways to ensure proper positioning of the electrode array within the scala tympani (e.g., intraoperative radiography, electrophysiological recordings), our study was aimed at detecting intraoperative electrophysiologic characteristics to better understand the mechanisms of those electrode tip fold-overs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a multi-centric, retrospective case-control series, patients with a postoperatively by radiography detected tip fold-over in perimodiolar electrodes were included. The point of fold-over (i.e., the electrode position) was determined and the intraoperative Auto-NRT recordings were analysed and evaluated. RESULTS: Four patients were found to have an electrode tip fold-over (out of 85 implantees). Significant changes of the Auto-NRT recordings were not detected. All tip fold-overs occurred in the most apical part of the electrodes. DISCUSSION: Cochlear implantation for hearing impairedpatients plays a decisive role in modern auditory rehabilitation. Perimodiolar electrode arrays may fold over during the insertion and, hence, could have a negative impact on audiological outcome. Characteristic electrophysiologic changes to possibly predict this were not found in our series.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cochlear implants; Electrophysiology; Imaging; Perimodiolar CI electrode; Tip fold-over
Authors: Danielle R Trakimas; Elliott D Kozin; Iman Ghanad; Sam R Barber; Hugh Curtin; Aaron K Remenschneider Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-03-24
Authors: David P Herrmann; Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff; Stefan Kaulitz; Mario Cebulla; Anja Kurz; Rudolf Hagen; Tilmann Neun; Kristen Rak Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 4.996