Literature DB >> 28784019

Mechanisms of electrode fold-over in cochlear implant surgery when using a flexible and slim perimodiolar electrode array.

Angel Ramos-Macias1, Angel R De Miguel2, Juan Carlos Falcon-González3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the design of a thin perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode array (CI532) and assesses insertion-related rotation and fold-over.
METHODS: The study consisted on a cochlear model and temporal bone insertion studies. Twenty insertions were studied, under four different surgical insertion conditions in vitro, the intracochlear disposition of the electrode array and presence of tip fold over were recorded. Also, eight fresh human temporal bones were studied after insertion in two conditions: correct alignment of the electrode array during the insertion and misaligned. These surgical situations were investigated within this study using a video recording of the dynamics of insertion techniques and X-ray, including fluoroscopy, Cone Beam CT, and digital imaging analysis.
RESULTS: For electrodes inserted with a correct surgical technique, the placement was perfect, within the scala tympani. The wrapping factor was 0.53, and the perimodiolar distance was below 0.3 mm, with a mean insertion depth of 405°.
CONCLUSIONS: A perimodiolar position can be achieved with the new CI532 electrode array. The new electrode also seems to be reliable for atraumatic intracochlear placement in scala tympani (ST).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Temporal bone; inner ear surgery; perimodiolar

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28784019     DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1271449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  5 in total

1.  Electrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case series.

Authors:  P Mittmann; G Lauer; A Ernst; S Mutze; F Hassepass; S Arndt; D Arweiler-Harbeck; F Christov
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

Authors:  C Riemann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Radiological evaluation of a new straight electrode array compared to its precursors.

Authors:  Manuel Christoph Ketterer; A Aschendorff; S Arndt; I Speck; A K Rauch; R Beck; F Hassepass
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Assessing the Placement of the Cochlear Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Array by Trans Impedance Matrix Analysis: A Temporal Bone Study.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos de Miguel; Diego Riol Sancho; Juan Carlos Falcón-González; Joana Pavone; Leandro Rodríguez Herrera; Silvia Borkoski Barreiro; Nadia Falcón Benitez; Ángel Ramos Macias
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics - a retrospective comparison study.

Authors:  A Perenyi; F Toth; B Dimak; R Nagy; P Schoerg; J Jori; J G Kiss; G Sprinzl; M Csanady; L Rovo
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-09-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.