OBJECTIVE: The position of cochlear implant (CI) electrodes in the cochlea is fundamental for the interaction between the implant and the neurons of the spiral ganglion. The scalar position of the electrode in the cochlea is assumed to be an important parameter for the clinical outcome. In our study, the intraoperative electrophysiologic characteristics in dependence of the position of CI electrodes in the scala tympani or in the scala vestibuli after scalar change should be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intraoperative impedances and neural response telemetry (NRT) data of 23 patients implanted with a Nucleus Advance Contour (Cochlear Pty, Sydney, Australia) electrode were recorded. One CI surgeon and two radiologists evaluated the electrode array's position independently radiologically by flat-panel tomography. Results from 17 patients with the electrode positioned in the scala tympani and six patients with the electrode changing intraoperatively from the tympanic into the vestibular scala were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant difference with an NRT threshold-based ratio for the groups. An estimation of the (radiologically confirmed) scalar position based on the NRT ratio was possible retrospectively. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of specific intraoperative electrophysiologic data allowed separating between a regular and an irregular (i.e., scalar changing) position of CI electrodes. This noninvasive methodology can support the postoperative radiologic evaluation of the CI electrode array position.
OBJECTIVE: The position of cochlear implant (CI) electrodes in the cochlea is fundamental for the interaction between the implant and the neurons of the spiral ganglion. The scalar position of the electrode in the cochlea is assumed to be an important parameter for the clinical outcome. In our study, the intraoperative electrophysiologic characteristics in dependence of the position of CI electrodes in the scala tympani or in the scala vestibuli after scalar change should be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intraoperative impedances and neural response telemetry (NRT) data of 23 patients implanted with a Nucleus Advance Contour (Cochlear Pty, Sydney, Australia) electrode were recorded. One CI surgeon and two radiologists evaluated the electrode array's position independently radiologically by flat-panel tomography. Results from 17 patients with the electrode positioned in the scala tympani and six patients with the electrode changing intraoperatively from the tympanic into the vestibular scala were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant difference with an NRT threshold-based ratio for the groups. An estimation of the (radiologically confirmed) scalar position based on the NRT ratio was possible retrospectively. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of specific intraoperative electrophysiologic data allowed separating between a regular and an irregular (i.e., scalar changing) position of CI electrodes. This noninvasive methodology can support the postoperative radiologic evaluation of the CI electrode array position.
Authors: Philipp Mittmann; I Todt; A Ernst; G Rademacher; S Mutze; S Göricke; M Schlamann; R Ramalingam; S Lang; F Christov; D Arweiler-Harbeck Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: P Mittmann; G Lauer; A Ernst; S Mutze; F Hassepass; S Arndt; D Arweiler-Harbeck; F Christov Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Christopher Kenneth Giardina; Elliot Samuel Krause; Kanthaiah Koka; Douglas Carl Fitzpatrick Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: A Stratmann; P Mittmann; G Rademacher; G Grupe; S Hoffmann; S Mutze; A Ernst; I Todt Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Yu Dong; Jeroen J Briaire; Michael Siebrecht; H Christiaan Stronks; Johan H M Frijns Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2021 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.570