Literature DB >> 34853805

Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images.

Yubo Fan1, Dongqing Zhang2, Rueben Banalagay3, Jianing Wang3, Jack H Noble3, Benoit M Dawant3.   

Abstract

Purpose: Robust and accurate segmentation methods for the intracochlear anatomy (ICA) are a critical step in the image-guided cochlear implant programming process. We have proposed an active shape model (ASM)-based method and a deep learning (DL)-based method for this task, and we have observed that the DL method tends to be more accurate than the ASM method while the ASM method tends to be more robust. Approach: We propose a DL-based U-Net-like architecture that incorporates ASM segmentation into the network. A quantitative analysis is performed on a dataset that consists of 11 cochlea specimens for which a segmentation ground truth is available. To qualitatively evaluate the robustness of the method, an experienced expert is asked to visually inspect and grade the segmentation results on a clinical dataset made of 138 image volumes acquired with conventional CT scanners and of 39 image volumes acquired with cone beam CT (CBCT) scanners. Finally, we compare training the network (1) first with the ASM results, and then fine-tuning it with the ground truth segmentation and (2) directly with the specimens with ground truth segmentation.
Results: Quantitative and qualitative results show that the proposed method increases substantially the robustness of the DL method while having only a minor detrimental effect (though not significant) on its accuracy. Expert evaluation of the clinical dataset shows that by incorporating the ASM segmentation into the DL network, the proportion of good segmentation cases increases from 60/177 to 119/177 when training only with the specimens and increases from 129/177 to 151/177 when pretraining with the ASM results. Conclusions: A hybrid ASM and DL-based segmentation method is proposed to segment the ICA in CT and CBCT images. Our results show that combining DL and ASM methods leads to a solution that is both robust and accurate.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D deep neural networks; cochlear implant; robust image segmentation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34853805      PMCID: PMC8612747          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.6.064002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  47 in total

1.  Cone beam and micro-computed tomography validation of manual array insertion for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Wilhelm Wimmer; Brett Bell; Markus E Huth; Christian Weisstanner; Nicolas Gerber; Martin Kompis; Stefan Weber; Marco Caversaccio
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Intra-cochlear electrode tip fold-over.

Authors:  Dalal Sabban; Marine Parodi; Marion Blanchard; Veronique Ettienne; Isabelle Rouillon; Natalie Loundon
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-01-24

4.  Preoperative prediction of angular insertion depth of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Mohammad M R Khan; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-03

5.  Use of MRI to determine cochlear duct length in patients undergoing cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Robert Nash; Sofia Otero; Jeremy Lavy
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-11-22

6.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Metal artifact reduction for the segmentation of the intra cochlear anatomy in CT images of the ear with 3D-conditional GANs.

Authors:  Jianing Wang; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice.

Authors:  P Pelliccia; F Venail; A Bonafé; M Makeieff; G Iannetti; M Bartolomeo; M Mondain
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Authors:  Devira Zahara; Rima Diana Dewi; Askaroellah Aboet; Fikri Mirza Putranto; Netty Delvrita Lubis; Taufik Ashar
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-24

10.  A Novel Method for Clinical Cochlear Duct Length Estimation toward Patient-Specific Cochlear Implant Selection.

Authors:  Daniel Schurzig; Max Eike Timm; Cornelia Batsoulis; Rolf Salcher; Daniel Sieber; Claude Jolly; Thomas Lenarz; Masoud Zoka-Assadi
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.