Literature DB >> 15457817

Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients.

Lawrence T Cohen1, Elaine Saunders, Louise M Richardson.   

Abstract

The feasibility of using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), measured with the NRT system (Neural Response Telemetry) and the NRT software (version 2.04), to quantify the longitudinal spread of neural excitation was examined in four subjects fitted with the Nucleus C124M cochlear implant. The ECAP and psychophysical forward-masking profiles were measured using stimulation on each of three electrodes, in basal, middle and apical positions. Spatial spread profiles derived from the ECAP measure produced broader functions than those derived from the psychophysical measure. These results, together with investigation of the change of ECAP spread pattern with stimulation current, suggest that functions derived from this 'simple' method were more influenced by the spread of electric field from excited neuron to electrode array than by breadth of the neural excitation pattern. The recently released NRT version 3.0 permits the masker and probe pulses to be delivered to separate electrodes, thus removing a fundamental limitation of version 2.04. Results from a pilot study, in which this capability was exploited, suggest that the spatial functions from this 'advanced' method may provide a better correlation with results from psychophysical forward masking.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457817     DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  14 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics.

Authors:  Ben H Bonham; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Electrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case series.

Authors:  P Mittmann; G Lauer; A Ernst; S Mutze; F Hassepass; S Arndt; D Arweiler-Harbeck; F Christov
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Exploring the Source of Neural Responses of Different Latencies Obtained from Different Recording Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Akinori Kashio; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

10.  Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.

Authors:  Stefan Brill; Joachim Müller; Rudolf Hagen; Alexander Möltner; Steffi-Johanna Brockmeier; Thomas Stark; Silke Helbig; Jan Maurer; Thomas Zahnert; Clemens Zierhofer; Peter Nopp; Ilona Anderson; Stefan Strahl
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.