Literature DB >> 31507179

Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.

Timothy J Giese1, Darrin M York1.   

Abstract

We use the PBE0/6-31G* density functional method to perform ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations under periodic boundary conditions with rigorous electrostatics using the ambient potential composite Ewald method in order to test the convergence of MM → QM/MM free energy corrections for the prediction of 17 small-molecule solvation free energies and eight ligand binding free energies to T4 lysozyme. The "indirect" thermodynamic cycle for calculating free energies is used to explore whether a series of reference potentials improve the statistical quality of the predictions. Specifically, we construct a series of reference potentials that optimize a molecular mechanical (MM) force field's parameters to reproduce the ab initio QM/MM forces from a QM/MM simulation. The optimizations form a systematic progression of successively expanded parameters that include bond, angle, dihedral, and charge parameters. For each reference potential, we calculate benchmark quality reference values for the MM → QM/MM correction by performing the mixed MM and QM/MM Hamiltonians at 11 intermediate states, each for 200 ps. We then compare forward and reverse application of Zwanzig's relation, thermodynamic integration (TI), and Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) methods as a function of reference potential, simulation time, and the number of simulated intermediate states. We find that Zwanzig's equation is inadequate unless a large number of intermediate states are explicitly simulated. The TI and BAR mean signed errors are very small even when only the end-state simulations are considered, and the standard deviations of the TI and BAR errors are decreased by choosing a reference potential that optimizes the bond and angle parameters. We find a robust approach for the data sets of fairly rigid molecules considered here is to use bond + angle reference potential together with the end-state-only BAR analysis. This requires QM/MM simulations to be performed in order to generate reference data to parametrize the bond + angle reference potential, and then this same simulation serves a dual purpose as the full QM/MM end state. The convergence of the results with respect to time suggests that computational resources may be used more efficiently by running multiple simulations for no more than 50 ps, rather than running one long simulation.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31507179      PMCID: PMC6834343          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  76 in total

1.  Frozen density functional free energy simulations of redox proteins: computational studies of the reduction potential of plastocyanin and rusticyanin.

Authors:  Mats H M Olsson; Gongyi Hong; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Use of Nonequilibrium Work Methods to Compute Free Energy Differences Between Molecular Mechanical and Quantum Mechanical Representations of Molecular Systems.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Phase-space overlap measures. II. Design and implementation of staging methods for free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Di Wu; David A Kofke
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Developing ab initio quality force fields from condensed phase quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations through the adaptive force matching method.

Authors:  Omololu Akin-Ojo; Yang Song; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  A "Stepping Stone" Approach for Obtaining Quantum Free Energies of Hydration.

Authors:  Chris Sampson; Thomas Fox; Christofer S Tautermann; Christopher Woods; Chris-Kriton Skylaris
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Computing converged free energy differences between levels of theory via nonequilibrium work methods: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fiona L Kearns; Phillip S Hudson; Henry L Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Computer-aided discovery of anti-HIV agents.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Kyungreem Han; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  A Comparison of QM/MM Simulations with and without the Drude Oscillator Model Based on Hydration Free Energies of Simple Solutes.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Walter Thiel; Alexander D MacKerell; Bernard R Brooks; Darrin M York
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  14 in total

1.  Accelerated Computation of Free Energy Profile at Ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Accuracy via a Semiempirical Reference Potential. 4. Adaptive QM/MM.

Authors:  Jia-Ning Wang; Wei Liu; Pengfei Li; Yan Mo; Wenxin Hu; Jun Zheng; Xiaoliang Pan; Yihan Shao; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  How accurate are approximate quantum chemical methods at modelling solute-solvent interactions in solvated clusters?

Authors:  Junbo Chen; Bun Chan; Yihan Shao; Junming Ho
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Multi-level free energy simulation with a staged transformation approach.

Authors:  Shingo Ito; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Differences in the Nature of the Phosphoryl Transfer Transition State in Protein Phosphatase 1 and Alkaline Phosphatase: Insights from QM Cluster Models.

Authors:  Rui Lai; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Luke Warrensford; Benjamin C Pollard; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael R Jones; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.179

8.  Affordable Ab Initio Path Integral for Thermodynamic Properties via Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Semiempirical Reference Potential.

Authors:  Yuanfei Xue; Jia-Ning Wang; Wenxin Hu; Jun Zheng; Yongle Li; Xiaoliang Pan; Yan Mo; Yihan Shao; Lu Wang; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 2.944

9.  Fragmentation Method for Computing Quantum Mechanics and Molecular Mechanics Gradients for Force Matching: Validation with Hydration Free Energy Predictions Using Adaptive Force Matching.

Authors:  Dong Zheng; Ying Yuan; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.944

10.  Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Tanmoy Pal; Luke Xie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.