Literature DB >> 30276502

Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.

Phillip S Hudson1,2, Kyungreem Han3, H Lee Woodcock4, Bernard R Brooks4.   

Abstract

Use of quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) methods in binding free energy calculations, particularly in the SAMPL challenge, often fail to achieve improvement over standard additive (MM) force fields. Frequently, the implementation is through use of reference potentials, or the so-called "indirect approach", and inherently relies on sufficient overlap existing between MM and QM/MM configurational spaces. This overlap is generally poor, particularly for the use of free energy perturbation to perform the MM to QM/MM free energy correction at the end states of interest (e.g., bound and unbound states). However, by utilizing MM parameters that best reproduce forces obtained at the desired QM level of theory, it is possible to lessen the configurational disparity between MM and QM/MM. To this end, we sought to use force matching to generate MM parameters for the SAMPL6 CB[8] host-guest binding challenge, classically compute binding free energies, and apply energetic end state corrections to obtain QM/MM binding free energy differences. For the standard set of 11 molecules and the bonus set (including three additional challenge molecules), error statistics, such as the root mean square deviation (RMSE) were moderately poor (5.5 and 5.4 kcal/mol). Correlation statistics, however, were in the top two for both standard and bonus set submissions ([Formula: see text] of 0.42 and 0.26, [Formula: see text] of 0.64 and 0.47 respectively). High RMSE and moderate correlation strongly indicated the presence of systematic error. Identifiable issues were ameliorated for two of the guest molecules, resulting in a reduction of error and pointing to strong prospects for the future use of this methodology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Force matching; Host–guest; Indirect free energy; SAMPL6

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276502      PMCID: PMC6867086          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0165-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  49 in total

1.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Pairwise-additive force fields for selected aqueous monovalent ions from adaptive force matching.

Authors:  Jicun Li; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Use of Nonequilibrium Work Methods to Compute Free Energy Differences Between Molecular Mechanical and Quantum Mechanical Representations of Molecular Systems.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  Developing ab initio quality force fields from condensed phase quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics calculations through the adaptive force matching method.

Authors:  Omololu Akin-Ojo; Yang Song; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  A "Stepping Stone" Approach for Obtaining Quantum Free Energies of Hydration.

Authors:  Chris Sampson; Thomas Fox; Christofer S Tautermann; Christopher Woods; Chris-Kriton Skylaris
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Computing converged free energy differences between levels of theory via nonequilibrium work methods: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fiona L Kearns; Phillip S Hudson; Henry L Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; C Daniel Varnado; Christopher W Bielawski; Adam R Urbach; Lyle Isaacs; Matthew T Geballe; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Kai Wang; John D Chodera; Yanzhi Yang; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  New faster CHARMM molecular dynamics engine.

Authors:  Antti-Pekka Hynninen; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  9 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Luke Warrensford; Benjamin C Pollard; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael R Jones; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.179

4.  Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.

Authors:  Kyungreem Han; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Naohiro Nishikawa; Florentina Tofoleanu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Multi-phase Boltzmann weighting: accounting for local inhomogeneity in molecular simulations of water-octanol partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Andreas Krämer; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.

Authors:  Mahdi Ghorbani; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Jeffery B Klauda; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.

Authors:  Yiğitcan Eken; Nuno M S Almeida; Cong Wang; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.