Literature DB >> 32752685

Multi-level free energy simulation with a staged transformation approach.

Shingo Ito1, Qiang Cui2.   

Abstract

Combining multiple levels of theory in free energy simulations to balance computational accuracy and efficiency is a promising approach for studying processes in the condensed phase. While the basic idea has been proposed and explored for quite some time, it remains challenging to achieve convergence for such multi-level free energy simulations as it requires a favorable distribution overlap between different levels of theory. Previous efforts focused on improving the distribution overlap by either altering the low-level of theory for the specific system of interest or ignoring certain degrees of freedom. Here, we propose an alternative strategy that first identifies the degrees of freedom that lead to gaps in the distributions of different levels of theory and then treats them separately with either constraints or restraints or by introducing an intermediate model that better connects the low and high levels of theory. As a result, the conversion from the low level to the high level model is done in a staged fashion that ensures a favorable distribution overlap along the way. Free energy components associated with different steps are mostly evaluated explicitly, and thus, the final result can be meaningfully compared to the rigorous free energy difference between the two levels of theory with limited and well-defined approximations. The additional free energy component calculations involve simulations at the low level of theory and therefore do not incur high computational costs. The approach is illustrated with two simple but non-trivial solution examples, and factors that dictate the reliability of the result are discussed.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32752685      PMCID: PMC7386948          DOI: 10.1063/5.0012494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  59 in total

1.  Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences.

Authors:  G E Crooks
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Multidimensional tunneling, recrossing, and the transmission coefficient for enzymatic reactions.

Authors:  Jingzhi Pu; Jiali Gao; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Charge-dependent model for many-body polarization, exchange, and dispersion interactions in hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Towards accurate ab initio QM/MM calculations of free-energy profiles of enzymatic reactions.

Authors:  Edina Rosta; Marco Klähn; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 6.  QM/MM modelling of drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Authors:  Richard Lonsdale; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Parametrization and Benchmark of DFTB3 for Organic Molecules.

Authors:  Michael Gaus; Albrecht Goez; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Efficient Computation of Free Energy Surfaces of Diels⁻Alder Reactions in Explicit Solvent at Ab Initio QM/MM Level.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Fengjiao Liu; Xiangyu Jia; Yihan Shao; Wenxin Hu; Jun Zheng; Ye Mei
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differences in the Nature of the Phosphoryl Transfer Transition State in Protein Phosphatase 1 and Alkaline Phosphatase: Insights from QM Cluster Models.

Authors:  Rui Lai; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Tanmoy Pal; Luke Xie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Optimizing the Calculation of Free Energy Differences in Nonequilibrium Work SQM/MM Switching Simulations.

Authors:  Andreas Schöller; Fiona Kearns; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.