Literature DB >> 26539729

Use of Nonequilibrium Work Methods to Compute Free Energy Differences Between Molecular Mechanical and Quantum Mechanical Representations of Molecular Systems.

Phillip S Hudson1, H Lee Woodcock1, Stefan Boresch2.   

Abstract

Carrying out free energy simulations (FES) using quantum mechanical (QM) Hamiltonians remains an attractive, albeit elusive goal. Renewed efforts in this area have focused on using "indirect" thermodynamic cycles to connect "low level" simulation results to "high level" free energies. The main obstacle to computing converged free energy results between molecular mechanical (MM) and QM (ΔA(MM→QM)), as recently demonstrated by us and others, is differences in the so-called "stiff" degrees of freedom (e.g., bond stretching) between the respective energy surfaces. Herein, we demonstrate that this problem can be efficiently circumvented using nonequilibrium work (NEW) techniques, i.e., Jarzynski's and Crooks' equations. Initial applications of computing ΔA(NEW)(MM→QM), for blocked amino acids alanine and serine as well as to generate butane's potentials of mean force via the indirect QM/MM FES method, showed marked improvement over traditional FES approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QM/MM; free energy simulations; nonequilibrium work techniques

Year:  2015        PMID: 26539729     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett        ISSN: 1948-7185            Impact factor:   6.475


  22 in total

1.  Accelerated Computation of Free Energy Profile at Ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Accuracy via a Semiempirical Reference Potential. 4. Adaptive QM/MM.

Authors:  Jia-Ning Wang; Wei Liu; Pengfei Li; Yan Mo; Wenxin Hu; Jun Zheng; Xiaoliang Pan; Yihan Shao; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Andrew C Simmonett; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Pavlo O Dral; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael Jones; Yihan Shao; Walter Thiel; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pK a corrections.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Jay W Ponder; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Adaptive Neural Networks.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun; Qiaole He; Xiao Li; Zhengdan Zhu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Accelerated computation of free energy profile at ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical accuracy via a semi-empirical reference potential. II. Recalibrating semi-empirical parameters with force matching.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Pan; Pengfei Li; Junming Ho; Jingzhi Pu; Ye Mei; Yihan Shao
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.