Literature DB >> 32936637

Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Tai-Sung Lee1, Bryce K Allen2, Timothy J Giese1, Zhenyu Guo3, Pengfei Li3, Charles Lin2, T Dwight McGee2, David A Pearlman4, Brian K Radak2, Yujun Tao1, Hsu-Chun Tsai1, Huafeng Xu2, Woody Sherman2, Darrin M York5.   

Abstract

Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and the associated thermodynamics of biomolecular recognition is a primary objective of structure-based drug design. Alchemical free energy simulations offer a highly accurate and computationally efficient route to achieving this goal. While the AMBER molecular dynamics package has successfully been used for alchemical free energy simulations in academic research groups for decades, widespread impact in industrial drug discovery settings has been minimal because of the previous limitations within the AMBER alchemical code, coupled with challenges in system setup and postprocessing workflows. Through a close academia-industry collaboration we have addressed many of the previous limitations with an aim to improve accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of alchemical binding free energy simulations in industrial drug discovery applications. Here, we highlight some of the recent advances in AMBER20 with a focus on alchemical binding free energy (BFE) calculations, which are less computationally intensive than alternative binding free energy methods where full binding/unbinding paths are explored. In addition to scientific and technical advances in AMBER20, we also describe the essential practical aspects associated with running relative alchemical BFE calculations, along with recommendations for best practices, highlighting the importance not only of the alchemical simulation code but also the auxiliary functionalities and expertise required to obtain accurate and reliable results. This work is intended to provide a contemporary overview of the scientific, technical, and practical issues associated with running relative BFE simulations in AMBER20, with a focus on real-world drug discovery applications.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32936637      PMCID: PMC7686026          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  221 in total

1.  Phase-space overlap measures. II. Design and implementation of staging methods for free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Di Wu; David A Kofke
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Parallelized-over-parts computation of absolute binding free energy with docking and molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Guha Jayachandran; Michael R Shirts; Sanghyun Park; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Errors in protein structures.

Authors:  R W Hooft; G Vriend; C Sander; E E Abola
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A "Stepping Stone" Approach for Obtaining Quantum Free Energies of Hydration.

Authors:  Chris Sampson; Thomas Fox; Christofer S Tautermann; Christopher Woods; Chris-Kriton Skylaris
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Computing converged free energy differences between levels of theory via nonequilibrium work methods: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fiona L Kearns; Phillip S Hudson; Henry L Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  FEW: a workflow tool for free energy calculations of ligand binding.

Authors:  Nadine Homeyer; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Reconstructing equilibrium entropy and enthalpy profiles from non-equilibrium pulling.

Authors:  Daun Jeong; Ioan Andricioaei
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Exploring the Stability of Ligand Binding Modes to Proteins by Molecular Dynamics Simulations: A Cross-docking Study.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Hironori Kokubo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Absolute Protein Binding Free Energy Simulations for Ligands with Multiple Poses, a Thermodynamic Path That Avoids Exhaustive Enumeration of the Poses.

Authors:  Yoshitake Sakae; Bin W Zhang; Ronald M Levy; Nanjie Deng
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Saturation Mutagenesis by Efficient Free-Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Zuzana Jandova; Daniel Fast; Martina Setz; Maria Pechlaner; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  27 in total

1.  Expanded Ensemble Methods Can be Used to Accurately Predict Protein-Ligand Relative Binding Free Energies.

Authors:  Si Zhang; David F Hahn; Michael R Shirts; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.578

2.  Modified Hamiltonian in FEP Calculations for Reducing the Computational Cost of Electrostatic Interactions.

Authors:  Hiraku Oshima; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.162

3.  Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling Using Generalized AMBER Force-Field Topologies: Application to Relative Hydration Free-Energy Calculations for Large Sets of Molecules.

Authors:  Salomé R Rieder; Benjamin Ries; Kay Schaller; Candide Champion; Emilia P Barros; Philippe H Hünenberger; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.162

4.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Extension of the Variational Free Energy Profile and Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio Methods for High-Dimensional Potential of Mean Force Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Şölen Ekesan; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Hannah M Baumann; Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Variational Method for Networkwide Analysis of Relative Ligand Binding Free Energies with Loop Closure and Experimental Constraints.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Deciphering nucleotide modification-induced structure and stability changes.

Authors:  Travis Hurst; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  Scaffold Hopping Transformations Using Auxiliary Restraints for Calculating Accurate Relative Binding Free Energies.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Zhipeng Li; Shuai Liu; Chunwang Peng; Dong Fang; Xiao Wan; Zhixiong Lin; Tai-Sung Lee; Daniel P Raleigh; Mingjun Yang; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.578

10.  Quantum simulations of SARS-CoV-2 main protease Mpro enable high-quality scoring of diverse ligands.

Authors:  Yuhang Wang; Sruthi Murlidaran; David A Pearlman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.