Literature DB >> 31333058

Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.

Jessica C Dai1, Mathew D Sorensen1,2, Helena C Chang1, Patrick C Samson1, Barbrina Dunmire3, Bryan W Cunitz3, Jeff Thiel3, Ziyue Liu4, Michael R Bailey1,3, Jonathan D Harper1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and
Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events.
Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of "dust" to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95%) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79%) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95% of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lithotripsy; ureteroscopy; urinary stones; urolithiasis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31333058      PMCID: PMC6798799          DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  14 in total

1.  Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Aditya Bagrodia; Amit Gupta; Karim Bensalah; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Yair Lotan; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Editorial Comment on: Evaluation of Renal Stone Comminution and Injury by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in a Pig Model by Maxwell et al. (From: Maxwell AD, Wang Y-N, Kreider W, et al. J Endourol 2019;33:787-792; DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0886).

Authors:  Ahmed Refat El-Nahas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Safety and Effectiveness of a Longer Focal Beam and Burst Duration in Ultrasonic Propulsion for Repositioning Urinary Stones and Fragments.

Authors:  Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; H Denny Liggitt; Jeff Thiel; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Barbrina Dunmire
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Khaled Madbouly; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy.

Authors:  David A Rebuck; Amanda Macejko; Vishal Bhalani; Patrick Ramos; Robert B Nadler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Andrew P Evan; Philip M Blomgren; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Marla Paun; Frank Starr; Bryan W Cunitz; Michael R Bailey; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Preclinical safety and effectiveness studies of ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Barbrina Dunmire; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Denny Liggitt; Marla Paun; Bryan W Cunitz; Frank Starr; Michael R Bailey; Kristina L Penniston; Franklin C Lee; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Effect of Stone Size and Composition on Ultrasonic Propulsion Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Michael R Bailey; Bryan W Cunitz; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Barbrina Dunmire
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium.

Authors:  Ben H Chew; Hilary L Brotherhood; Roger L Sur; An Qi Wang; Bodo E Knudsen; Courtney Yong; Tracy Marien; Nicole L Miller; Amy E Krambeck; Cameron Charchenko; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Fragmentation of Stones by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in the First 19 Humans.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; James E Lingeman; Robert M Sweet; Ian S Metzler; Peter L Sunaryo; James C Williams; Adam D Maxwell; Jeff Thiel; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 7.600

3.  First In-Human Burst Wave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Comminution: Initial Two Case Studies.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Ian Metzler; Michael Kennedy Hall; Tony T Chen; Adam D Maxwell; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Jeff Thiel; James C Williams; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  In-Office Ultrasound Facilitates Timely Clinical Care at a Multidisciplinary Kidney Stone Center.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Jeff Thiel; Jessica C Dai; Michael R Bailey; Barbrina Dunmire; Patrick C Samson; Helena Chang; M Kennedy Hall; Brianna Gutierrez; Robert M Sweet; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2020-05

5.  Pearl-unjammed: the Seattle stone maneuver for ureteropelvic junction urolithiasis.

Authors:  M Kennedy Hall; Patrick C Samson; Ross Kessler; Kris Lehnhardt; Benjamin Easter; Jeff Thiel; Hunter Wessells; Michael R Bailey; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-03-25

6.  A single center study that evaluates the preclinical use of a newly developed software and moving bed system to facilitate the spontaneous excretion of residual fragments after primary stone treatment (RIRS or PCNL).

Authors:  Tao Yang; Rijin Song; Xianghu Meng; Hanping Wei; Xinying Jiang; Xiaoliang Yuan; Xiaowu Liu; Zhimin Jiao; Jun Liu; Honglei Shi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Burst wave lithotripsy and acoustic manipulation of stones.

Authors:  Tony T Chen; Patrick C Samson; Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.808

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.