Literature DB >> 19152935

Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Jay D Raman1, Aditya Bagrodia, Amit Gupta, Karim Bensalah, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Yair Lotan, Margaret S Pearle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We reviewed the natural history of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1999 to January 2007 a total of 728 patients underwent percutaneous nephrostolithotomy at our medical center including 527 with a minimum documented radiographic followup of 6 months. Of these patients 42 (8%) with residual fragments on postoperative computerized tomography were observed rather than subjected to second look flexible nephroscopy. Computerized tomography was reviewed to define location, size and number of residual fragments. The primary study end point was a stone related event defined as growth of a residual fragment, or need for emergency room visit, hospitalization or additional intervention attributable to the residual fragment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of a stone related event.
RESULTS: The median residual fragment size was 2 mm (range, 1 to 12). There were 18 patients (43%) who experienced a stone related event at a median of 32 months after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (range 4 to 95). On univariate analysis residual fragment location in the renal pelvis or ureter (p = 0.02), maximum residual fragment size larger than 2 mm (p = 0.03) and cumulative residual fragment size (p = 0.03) predicted a stone related event. On multivariate analysis only maximum residual fragment size larger than 2 mm (HR 3.9, p = 0.01) and location in the renal pelvis or ureter (HR 4.4, p = 0.01) independently predicted a stone event.
CONCLUSIONS: The size and location of post-percutaneous nephrostolithotomy residual fragments correlate with stone related events. Larger fragments are more likely to require secondary surgical intervention. Second look flexible nephroscopy may be of benefit in patients with residual fragments larger than 2 mm or in those with fragments located in the renal pelvis or ureter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152935     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  37 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Medium-term follow-up of clinically insignificant residual fragments after minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prognostic features and risk factors.

Authors:  Xin Li; Long He; Jianzhong Li; Zhongyang Duan; Zijian Gao; Long Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

3.  Best of the 2008 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights from the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, May 17-22, 2008, Orlando, FL.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer; Danil V Makarov; Alan W Partin; Claus G Roehrborn; J Curtis Nickel; Shing-Hwa Lu; Naoki Yoshimura; Michael B Chancellor; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

4.  Influence of endourological devices on 3D reconstruction image quality using the Uro Dyna-CT.

Authors:  M-C Rassweiler; M Ritter; M-S Michel; A Häcker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of a single institution experience over 25 years.

Authors:  Jennifer Bjazevic; Linda Nott; Philippe D Violette; Thomas Tailly; Marie Dion; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Bansal; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Kawaljit Singh; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Second-look nephroscopy after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-04

8.  Stones: can the Guy's stone score predict PNL outcomes?

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Simultaneous bilateral tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A report of 2 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alice Yu; Walid Shahrour; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  The "old" 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size.

Authors:  Hanan Goldberg; Dor Golomb; Yariv Shtabholtz; Shlomi Tapiero; German Creiderman; Avi Shariv; Jack Baniel; David Lifhshitz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.