Literature DB >> 21109293

The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy.

David A Rebuck1, Amanda Macejko, Vishal Bhalani, Patrick Ramos, Robert B Nadler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the natural history of postureteroscopic renal stone fragments ≤4 mm based on computed tomography (CT) follow-up. The goal of ureteroscopy is to fragment stones, actively basket and remove fragments larger than 1 mm, and allow the remaining fragments to pass spontaneously. The reality is that smaller fragments may be difficult to extract or may be missed.
METHODS: Patients treated with ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis by a single surgeon from May 2001 to July 2008 at a tertiary referral center were identified. Patients with residual renal fragments measuring ≤4 mm on initial postoperative CT and at least one additional follow-up CT were included. Outcomes measured were fragment growth and location, stone event (emergency department visit, hospitalization, or additional intervention), and spontaneous fragment passage.
RESULTS: Of 330 ureteroscopies, 51 met inclusion criteria. For these patients, the mean follow-up duration was 18.9 months (1.6 years). Among 46 ureteroscopies for calcium-based stones, 9 patients (19.6%) experienced a stone event, 10 patients (21.7%) spontaneously passed their fragments, and the remaining 27 patients (58.7%) retained asymptomatic residual fragments. Among this asymptomatic group, mean fragment sizes were similar at 2.7, 3.3, 3.5, and 3.0 mm at mean follow-up durations of 2.8, 10.2, 16.8, and 33.0 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that among patients with postureteroscopic renal stone fragments ≤4 mm, approximately one in five (or 19.6%) will experience a stone event over the following 1.6 years. The remaining patients will either become stone-free via spontaneous passage or retain asymptomatic stable-sized fragments.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109293     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  22 in total

1.  What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Bansal; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Kawaljit Singh; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Stones: can the Guy's stone score predict PNL outcomes?

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Javier E Santiago; Adam B Hollander; Samit D Soni; Richard E Link; Wesley A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates?

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced lithotripsy: in-vitro investigations on fragmentation, dusting, propulsion and fluorescence.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Stephan Ströbl; Thomas Pongratz; Frank Strittmatter; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Asymptomatic Renal Stones-to Treat or Not to Treat.

Authors:  Necole M Streeper
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Future of kidney stone surgery: will we treat small stones with large-sized PCNL and big stones with RIRS?

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Theodoros Tokas; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Role of conservative management of stones.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Hector Sandoval Barba; Maitrey Darrad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 9.  Focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones: review and update of preclinical technology.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey; Ryan S Hsi; Bryan W Cunitz; Julianna C Simon; Yak-Nam Wang; Barbrina L Dunmire; Marla Paun; Frank Starr; Wei Lu; Andrew P Evan; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.