Literature DB >> 28537452

Safety and Effectiveness of a Longer Focal Beam and Burst Duration in Ultrasonic Propulsion for Repositioning Urinary Stones and Fragments.

Karmon M Janssen1, Timothy C Brand1, Bryan W Cunitz2, Yak-Nam Wang2, Julianna C Simon2, Frank Starr2, H Denny Liggitt3, Jeff Thiel4, Mathew D Sorensen5,6, Jonathan D Harper5, Michael R Bailey2, Barbrina Dunmire2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the first-in-human trial of ultrasonic propulsion, subjects passed collections of residual stone fragments repositioned with a C5-2 probe. Here, effectiveness and safety in moving multiple fragments are compared between the C5-2 and a custom (SC-50) probe that produces a longer focal beam and burst duration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effectiveness was quantified by the number of stones expelled from a calyx phantom consisting of a 30-mm deep, water-filled well in a block of tissue mimicking material. Each probe was positioned below the phantom to move stones against gravity. Single propulsion bursts of 50 ms or 3 s duration were applied to three separate targets: 10 fragments of 2 different sizes (1-2 and 2-3 mm) and a single 4 × 7 mm human stone. Safety studies consisted of porcine kidneys exposed to an extreme dose of 10-minute burst duration, including a 7-day survival study and acute studies with surgically implanted stones.
RESULTS: Although successful in the clinical trial, the shorter focal beam and maximum 50 ms burst duration of the C5-2 probe moved stones, but did not expel any stones from the phantom's 30-mm deep calyx. The results were similar with the SC-50 probe under the same 50 ms burst duration. Longer (3 s) bursts available with the SC-50 probe expelled all stones at both 4.5 and 9.5 cm "skin-to-stone" depths with lower probe heating compared to the C5-2. No abnormal behavior, urine chemistry, serum chemistry, or histological findings were observed within the kidney or surrounding tissues for the 10 min burst duration used in the animal studies.
CONCLUSIONS: A longer focal beam and burst duration improved expulsion of a stone and multiple stone fragments from a phantom over a broad range of clinically relevant penetration depths and did not cause kidney injury in animal studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lithotripsy; ultrasound; ureteroscopy; urinary stone; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28537452      PMCID: PMC5567608          DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

Review 1.  A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects.

Authors:  K G Baker; V J Robertson; F A Duck
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-07

2.  Models and regulatory considerations for transient temperature rise during diagnostic ultrasound pulses.

Authors:  Bruce A Herman; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Enzyme histochemical analysis of cell viability after argon laser-induced coagulation necrosis of the skin.

Authors:  R A Neumann; R M Knobler; F Pieczkowski; W Gebhart
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Content and face validation of a curriculum for ultrasonic propulsion of calculi in a human renal model.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Xuemei He; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Shock formation and nonlinear saturation effects in the ultrasound field of a diagnostic curvilinear probe.

Authors:  Maria M Karzova; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova; Bryan W Cunitz; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones.

Authors:  Anup Shah; Neil R Owen; Wei Lu; Bryan W Cunitz; Peter J Kaczkowski; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-22

7.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney.

Authors:  Anup Shah; Jonathan D Harper; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Marla Paun; Julianna C Simon; Wei Lu; Peter J Kaczkowski; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  First in Human Clinical Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Franklin C Lee; Mathew D Sorensen; Ryan S Hsi; Jeff Thiel; Hunter Wessells; James E Lingeman; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Focused ultrasound to displace renal calculi: threshold for tissue injury.

Authors:  Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Bryan W Cunitz; Frank L Starr; Marla Paun; Denny H Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ziyue Liu; Barbrina Dunmire; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2014-03-31
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  In Vitro Evaluation of Urinary Stone Comminution with a Clinical Burst Wave Lithotripsy System.

Authors:  Shivani Ramesh; Tony T Chen; Adam D Maxwell; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Jeff Thiel; James C Williams; Anthony Gardner; Ziyue Liu; Ian Metzler; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Update on clinical trials of kidney stone repositioning and preclinical results of stone breaking with one system.

Authors:  M R Bailey; Y N Wang; W Kreider; J C Dai; B W Cunitz; J D Harper; H Chang; M D Sorensen; Z Liu; O Levy; B Dunmire; A D Maxwell
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2018-12-21

4.  Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Mathew D Sorensen; Helena C Chang; Patrick C Samson; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Jeff Thiel; Ziyue Liu; Michael R Bailey; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Some Work on the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Stones with Ultrasound.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Adam D Maxwell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Acoust Today       Date:  2017

6.  Characterizing the Acoustic Output of an Ultrasonic Propulsion Device for Urinary Stones.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Effect of Stone Size and Composition on Ultrasonic Propulsion Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Karmon M Janssen; Timothy C Brand; Michael R Bailey; Bryan W Cunitz; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Barbrina Dunmire
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  First In-Human Burst Wave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Comminution: Initial Two Case Studies.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Ian Metzler; Michael Kennedy Hall; Tony T Chen; Adam D Maxwell; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Jeff Thiel; James C Williams; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Burst wave lithotripsy and acoustic manipulation of stones.

Authors:  Tony T Chen; Patrick C Samson; Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.808

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.