Literature DB >> 17144853

Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones.

Ahmed R El-Nahas1, Ahmed M El-Assmy, Khaled Madbouly, Khaled Z Sheir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the predictors of the clinical outcome of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the last 10 years, residual fragments < or =5 mm were present in 99 male and 55 female patients (mean age 43.1 years) for >3 months after SWL for renal stones. Follow-up with history, urine examination, and non-contrast CT scanning was carried out every 6 months or when symptoms developed. Clinically insignificant residual fragments were diagnosed in patients who became stone free or had asymptomatic fragments of the same size during follow-up. A clinically significant outcome was considered to have occurred in patients requiring secondary intervention for regrowth of the fragments or medical treatment for frequent symptomatic episodes. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox-regression) analyses were performed to determine significant predictors of the outcome. The mean follow-up was 31 months (range 6-80 months).
RESULTS: Stone-free status, regrowth of fragments, and persistence of fragments of the same size were present in 21 (13.6%), 52 (33.8%), and 81 (52.6%) patients, respectively. A clinically significant outcome was documented in 75 patients (48.7%) as percutaneous nephrolithotomy was needed in 2, repeat SWL in 50, and medical treatment for symptomatic episodes in 23 patients. Significant independent predictors of a clinically significant outcome were fragment size > or =4 mm and history of recurrent stone disease (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The term "clinically insignificant residual fragments" is not appropriate for all patients with post-SWL fragments, as 48.7% of patients had fragments that became clinically significant. Fragments of 4 to 5 mm and recurrent stone disease predicted clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17144853     DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.20.870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  22 in total

1.  Histotripsy erosion of model urinary calculi.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; Timothy L Hall; Adam D Maxwell; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Medium-term follow-up of clinically insignificant residual fragments after minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prognostic features and risk factors.

Authors:  Xin Li; Long He; Jianzhong Li; Zhongyang Duan; Zijian Gao; Long Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 3.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Javier E Santiago; Adam B Hollander; Samit D Soni; Richard E Link; Wesley A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Accuracy in detecting and measuring residual fragments with the Uro Dyna-CT.

Authors:  B Meister; M C Rassweiler; C Weiß; A Häcker; M Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Role of conservative management of stones.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Hector Sandoval Barba; Maitrey Darrad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 7.  When (and how) to surgically treat asymptomatic renal stones.

Authors:  Zachariah G Goldsmith; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Effect of high shock number on acute complication development after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Miriam Hadj-Moussa; James A Brown
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Controlled cavitation to augment SWL stone comminution: mechanistic insights in vitro.

Authors:  Alexander P Duryea; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.