Literature DB >> 31264170

Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI.

Hossein Arabi1, Guodong Zeng2, Guoyan Zheng2,3, Habib Zaidi4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative PET/MR imaging is challenged by the accuracy of synthetic CT (sCT) generation from MR images. Deep learning-based algorithms have recently gained momentum for a number of medical image analysis applications. In this work, a novel sCT generation algorithm based on deep learning adversarial semantic structure (DL-AdvSS) is proposed for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed DL-AdvSS algorithm exploits the ASS learning framework to constrain the synthetic CT generation process to comply with the extracted structural features from CT images. The proposed technique was evaluated through comparison to an atlas-based sCT generation method (Atlas), previously developed for MRI-only or PET/MRI-guided radiation planning. Moreover, the commercial segmentation-based approach (Segm) implemented on the Philips TF PET/MRI system was included in the evaluation. Clinical brain studies of 40 patients who underwent PET/CT and MR imaging were used for the evaluation of the proposed method under a two-fold cross validation scheme.
RESULTS: The accuracy of cortical bone extraction and CT value estimation were investigated for the three different methods. Atlas and DL-AdvSS exhibited similar cortical bone extraction accuracy resulting in a Dice coefficient of 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.77 ± 0.07, respectively. Likewise, DL-AdvSS and Atlas techniques performed similarly in terms of CT value estimation in the cortical bone region where a mean error (ME) of less than -11 HU was obtained. The Segm approach led to a ME of -1025 HU. Furthermore, the quantitative analysis of corresponding PET images using the three approaches assuming the CT-based attenuation corrected PET (PETCTAC) as reference demonstrated comparative performance of DL-AdvSS and Atlas techniques with a mean standardized uptake value (SUV) bias less than 4% in 63 brain regions. In addition, less that 2% SUV bias was observed in the cortical bone when using Atlas and DL-AdvSS approaches. However, Segm resulted in 14.7 ± 8.9% SUV underestimation in the cortical bone.
CONCLUSION: The proposed DL-AdvSS approach demonstrated competitive performance with respect to the state-of-the-art atlas-based technique achieving clinically tolerable errors, thus outperforming the commercial segmentation approach used in the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; Brain imaging; Deep learning; PET/MRI; Quantitative imaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 31264170     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04380-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  33 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Marie-Louise Montandon; Daniel O Slosman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Strategies for attenuation compensation in neurological PET studies.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Marie-Louise Montandon; Steve Meikle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Motion correction options in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Comparative study of algorithms for synthetic CT generation from MRI: Consequences for MRI-guided radiation planning in the pelvic region.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Jason A Dowling; Ninon Burgos; Xiao Han; Peter B Greer; Nikolaos Koutsouvelis; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  One registration multi-atlas-based pseudo-CT generation for attenuation correction in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  MR Imaging-Guided Partial Volume Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  Kjell Erlandsson; John Dickson; Simon Arridge; David Atkinson; Sebastien Ourselin; Brian F Hutton
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-11-27

8.  Deep embedding convolutional neural network for synthesizing CT image from T1-Weighted MR image.

Authors:  Lei Xiang; Qian Wang; Dong Nie; Lichi Zhang; Xiyao Jin; Yu Qiao; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks.

Authors:  Hajar Emami; Ming Dong; Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Estimating CT Image From MRI Data Using Structured Random Forest and Auto-Context Model.

Authors:  Tri Huynh; Yaozong Gao; Jiayin Kang; Li Wang; Pei Zhang; Jun Lian; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine image generation.

Authors:  Zhibiao Cheng; Junhai Wen; Gang Huang; Jianhua Yan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

2.  MR-based PET attenuation correction using a combined ultrashort echo time/multi-echo Dixon acquisition.

Authors:  Paul Kyu Han; Debra E Horng; Kuang Gong; Yoann Petibon; Kyungsang Kim; Quanzheng Li; Keith A Johnson; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang; Chao Ma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  ZTE MR-based attenuation correction in brain FDG-PET/MR: performance in patients with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Brian Sgard; Maya Khalifé; Arthur Bouchut; Brice Fernandez; Marine Soret; Alain Giron; Clara Zaslavsky; Gaspar Delso; Marie-Odile Habert; Aurélie Kas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body 18F-FDG PET using a deep residual network.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Hossein Arabi; Parham Geramifar; Ghasem Hajianfar; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Patch-based generative adversarial neural network models for head and neck MR-only planning.

Authors:  Peter Klages; Ilyes Benslimane; Sadegh Riyahi; Jue Jiang; Margie Hunt; Joseph O Deasy; Harini Veeraraghavan; Neelam Tyagi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Deep-learning-based methods of attenuation correction for SPECT and PET.

Authors:  Xiongchao Chen; Chi Liu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Yabo Fu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  MR-based Attenuation Correction for Brain PET Using 3D Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Jaewon Yang; Peder E Z Larson; Spencer C Behr; Thomas A Hope; Youngho Seo; Quanzheng Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-03

9.  Projection Space Implementation of Deep Learning-Guided Low-Dose Brain PET Imaging Improves Performance over Implementation in Image Space.

Authors:  Amirhossein Sanaat; Hossein Arabi; Ismini Mainta; Valentina Garibotto; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 10.  Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.