Literature DB >> 35680755

Deep-learning-based methods of attenuation correction for SPECT and PET.

Xiongchao Chen1, Chi Liu2,3.   

Abstract

Attenuation correction (AC) is essential for quantitative analysis and clinical diagnosis of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is utilized to generate attenuation maps (μ-maps) for AC of hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT scanners. However, CT-based AC methods frequently produce artifacts due to CT artifacts and misregistration of SPECT-CT and PET-CT scans. Segmentation-based AC methods using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for PET/MRI scanners are inaccurate and complicated since MRI does not contain direct information of photon attenuation. Computational AC methods for SPECT and PET estimate attenuation coefficients directly from raw emission data, but suffer from low accuracy, cross-talk artifacts, high computational complexity, and high noise level. The recently evolving deep-learning-based methods have shown promising results in AC of SPECT and PET, which can be generally divided into two categories: indirect and direct strategies. Indirect AC strategies apply neural networks to transform emission, transmission, or MR images into synthetic μ-maps or CT images which are then incorporated into AC reconstruction. Direct AC strategies skip the intermediate steps of generating μ-maps or CT images and predict AC SPECT or PET images from non-attenuation-correction (NAC) SPECT or PET images directly. These deep-learning-based AC methods show comparable and even superior performance to non-deep-learning methods. In this article, we first discussed the principles and limitations of non-deep-learning AC methods, and then reviewed the status and prospects of deep-learning-based methods for AC of SPECT and PET.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; PET; SPECT; deep learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 35680755     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03007-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  69 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Bruce Hasegawa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  SPECT attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology's manifest destiny.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  SPECT/CT physical principles and attenuation correction.

Authors:  James A Patton; Timothy G Turkington
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2008-02-20

5.  Role of risk stratification by SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging in guiding management of stable patients with ischaemic heart disease: expert panel of the EANM cardiovascular committee and EACVI.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Oliver Gaemperli; Alessia Gimelli; Paul Knaapen; Thomas H Schindler; Hein J Verberne; Michael J Zellweger
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 6.  PET/SPECT imaging agents for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Lin Zhu; Karl Ploessl; Hank F Kung
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; Roel S Driessen; Jonathon Leipsic; Rekha Raju; Chris Naoum; Juhani Knuuti; Maija Mäki; Richard S Underwood; James K Min; Kimberly Elmore; Wynand J Stuijfzand; Niels van Royen; Igor I Tulevski; Aernout G Somsen; Marc C Huisman; Arthur A van Lingen; Martijn W Heymans; Peter M van de Ven; Cornelis van Kuijk; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Albert C van Rossum; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 8.  PET/SPECT molecular imaging in clinical neuroscience: recent advances in the investigation of CNS diseases.

Authors:  Feng-Mei Lu; Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-06

9.  The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Einat Even-Sapir; Ur Metser; Eyal Mishani; Gennady Lievshitz; Hedva Lerman; Ilan Leibovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.