Literature DB >> 27260522

One registration multi-atlas-based pseudo-CT generation for attenuation correction in PET/MRI.

Hossein Arabi1, Habib Zaidi2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The outcome of a detailed assessment of various strategies for atlas-based whole-body bone segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was exploited to select the optimal parameters and setting, with the aim of proposing a novel one-registration multi-atlas (ORMA) pseudo-CT generation approach.
METHODS: The proposed approach consists of only one online registration between the target and reference images, regardless of the number of atlas images (N), while for the remaining atlas images, the pre-computed transformation matrices to the reference image are used to align them to the target image. The performance characteristics of the proposed method were evaluated and compared with conventional atlas-based attenuation map generation strategies (direct registration of the entire atlas images followed by voxel-wise weighting (VWW) and arithmetic averaging atlas fusion). To this end, four different positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation maps were generated via arithmetic averaging and VWW scheme using both direct registration and ORMA approaches as well as the 3-class attenuation map obtained from the Philips Ingenuity TF PET/MRI scanner commonly used in the clinical setting. The evaluation was performed based on the accuracy of extracted whole-body bones by the different attenuation maps and by quantitative analysis of resulting PET images compared to CT-based attenuation-corrected PET images serving as reference.
RESULTS: The comparison of validation metrics regarding the accuracy of extracted bone using the different techniques demonstrated the superiority of the VWW atlas fusion algorithm achieving a Dice similarity measure of 0.82 ± 0.04 compared to arithmetic averaging atlas fusion (0.60 ± 0.02), which uses conventional direct registration. Application of the ORMA approach modestly compromised the accuracy, yielding a Dice similarity measure of 0.76 ± 0.05 for ORMA-VWW and 0.55 ± 0.03 for ORMA-averaging. The results of quantitative PET analysis followed the same trend with less significant differences in terms of SUV bias, whereas massive improvements were observed compared to PET images corrected for attenuation using the 3-class attenuation map. The maximum absolute bias achieved by VWW and VWW-ORMA methods was 06.4 ± 5.5 in the lung and 07.9 ± 4.8 in the bone, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm is capable of generating decent attenuation maps. The quantitative analysis revealed a good correlation between PET images corrected for attenuation using the proposed pseudo-CT generation approach and the corresponding CT images. The computational time is reduced by a factor of 1/N at the expense of a modest decrease in quantitative accuracy, thus allowing us to achieve a reasonable compromise between computing time and quantitative performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas; Attenuation correction; Attenuation map; Hybrid imaging; PET/MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27260522     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3422-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  43 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Marie-Louise Montandon; Daniel O Slosman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  MR-Based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging.

Authors:  Ilja Bezrukov; Frédéric Mantlik; Holger Schmidt; Bernhard Schölkopf; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences.

Authors:  Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities.

Authors:  Abolfazl Mehranian; Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Montandon; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Quantitative analysis of MRI-guided attenuation correction techniques in time-of-flight brain PET/MRI.

Authors:  Abolfazl Mehranian; Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Attenuation correction methods suitable for brain imaging with a PET/MRI scanner: a comparison of tissue atlas and template attenuation map approaches.

Authors:  Ian B Malone; Richard E Ansorge; Guy B Williams; Peter J Nestor; T Adrian Carpenter; Tim D Fryer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Jyrki Mp Lötjönen; Robin Wolz; Juha R Koikkalainen; Lennart Thurfjell; Gunhild Waldemar; Hilkka Soininen; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  9 in total

1.  Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Guodong Zeng; Guoyan Zheng; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  An atlas-based multimodal registration method for 2D images with discrepancy structures.

Authors:  Wenchao Lv; Houjin Chen; Yahui Peng; Yanfeng Li; Jupeng Li
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body 18F-FDG PET using a deep residual network.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Hossein Arabi; Parham Geramifar; Ghasem Hajianfar; Pardis Ghafarian; Arman Rahmim; Mohammad Reza Ay; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  MRI-guided attenuation correction in torso PET/MRI: Assessment of segmentation-, atlas-, and deep learning-based approaches in the presence of outliers.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.737

6.  A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients.

Authors:  Claes N Ladefoged; Ian Law; Udunna Anazodo; Keith St Lawrence; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana; Ninon Burgos; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Brian Hutton; Inés Mérida; Nicolas Costes; Alexander Hammers; Didier Benoit; Søren Holm; Meher Juttukonda; Hongyu An; Jorge Cabello; Mathias Lukas; Stephan Nekolla; Sibylle Ziegler; Matthias Fenchel; Bjoern Jakoby; Michael E Casey; Tammie Benzinger; Liselotte Højgaard; Adam E Hansen; Flemming L Andersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Deep learning-guided joint attenuation and scatter correction in multitracer neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Karin Bortolin; Nathalie Ginovart; Valentina Garibotto; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  PET/MRI attenuation estimation in the lung: A review of past, present, and potential techniques.

Authors:  Joseph Lillington; Ludovica Brusaferri; Kerstin Kläser; Karin Shmueli; Radhouene Neji; Brian F Hutton; Francesco Fraioli; Simon Arridge; Manuel Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Kris Thielemans; David Atkinson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Metal artifact correction strategies in MRI-based attenuation correction in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Georg Schramm; Claes Nøhr Ladefoged
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-11-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.