Literature DB >> 29901223

Generating synthetic CTs from magnetic resonance images using generative adversarial networks.

Hajar Emami1, Ming Dong1, Siamak P Nejad-Davarani2, Carri K Glide-Hurst2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While MR-only treatment planning using synthetic CTs (synCTs) offers potential for streamlining clinical workflow, a need exists for an efficient and automated synCT generation in the brain to facilitate near real-time MR-only planning. This work describes a novel method for generating brain synCTs based on generative adversarial networks (GANs), a deep learning model that trains two competing networks simultaneously, and compares it to a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).
METHODS: Post-Gadolinium T1-Weighted and CT-SIM images from fifteen brain cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. The GAN model was developed to generate synCTs using T1-weighted MRI images as the input using a residual network (ResNet) as the generator. The discriminator is a CNN with five convolutional layers that classified the input image as real or synthetic. Fivefold cross-validation was performed to validate our model. GAN performance was compared to CNN based on mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) metrics between the synCT and CT images.
RESULTS: GAN training took ~11 h with a new case testing time of 5.7 ± 0.6 s. For GAN, MAEs between synCT and CT-SIM were 89.3 ± 10.3 Hounsfield units (HU) and 41.9 ± 8.6 HU across the entire FOV and tissues, respectively. However, MAE in the bone and air was, on average, ~240-255 HU. By comparison, the CNN model had an average full FOV MAE of 102.4 ± 11.1 HU. For GAN, the mean PSNR was 26.6 ± 1.2 and SSIM was 0.83 ± 0.03. GAN synCTs preserved details better than CNN, and regions of abnormal anatomy were well represented on GAN synCTs.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a GAN model using a single T1-weighted MR image as the input that generates robust, high quality synCTs in seconds. Our method offers strong potential for supporting near real-time MR-only treatment planning in the brain.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generative adversarial network; radiation therapy; synthetic CTs

Year:  2018        PMID: 29901223      PMCID: PMC6294710          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  Population based ranking of frameless CT-MRI registration methods.

Authors:  Gabor Opposits; Sándor A Kis; Lajos Trón; Ervin Berényi; Endre Takács; József G Dobai; László Bognár; Bernadett Szűcs; Miklós Emri
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.820

Review 2.  New developments in MRI for target volume delineation in radiotherapy.

Authors:  V S Khoo; D L Joon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Target volumes in radiotherapy for high-grade malignant glioma of the brain.

Authors:  E P Jansen; L G Dewit; M van Herk; H Bartelink
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time.

Authors:  Adam Johansson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yingli Yang; Minsong Cao; Tania Kaprealian; Ke Sheng; Yu Gao; Fei Han; Caitlin Gomez; Anand Santhanam; Stephen Tenn; Nzhde Agazaryan; Daniel A Low; Peng Hu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Imaging and target volume delineation in glioma.

Authors:  G A Whitfield; S R Kennedy; I K Djoukhadar; A Jackson
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Accuracy of inverse treatment planning on substitute CT images derived from MR data for brain lesions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Mohammad M Akhtari; Magnus G Karlsson; Adam Johansson; Thomas Asklund; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Validation of accuracy in image co-registration with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  Hisato Nakazawa; Yoshimasa Mori; Masataka Komori; Yuta Shibamoto; Takahiko Tsugawa; Tatsuya Kobayashi; Chisa Hashizume
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.

Authors:  C F Njeh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-10
View more
  38 in total

1.  Estimation of the radiation dose in pregnancy: an automated patient-specific model using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Guodong Zeng; Guoyan Zheng; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  MRI-based synthetic CT generation using semantic random forest with iterative refinement.

Authors:  Yang Lei; Joseph Harms; Tonghe Wang; Sibo Tian; Jun Zhou; Hui-Kuo Shu; Jim Zhong; Hui Mao; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  GAN and dual-input two-compartment model-based training of a neural network for robust quantification of contrast uptake rate in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Josiah Simeth; Yue Cao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Patch-based generative adversarial neural network models for head and neck MR-only planning.

Authors:  Peter Klages; Ilyes Benslimane; Sadegh Riyahi; Jue Jiang; Margie Hunt; Joseph O Deasy; Harini Veeraraghavan; Neelam Tyagi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Cross-modality (CT-MRI) prior augmented deep learning for robust lung tumor segmentation from small MR datasets.

Authors:  Jue Jiang; Yu-Chi Hu; Neelam Tyagi; Pengpeng Zhang; Andreas Rimner; Joseph O Deasy; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Novel Deep Learning Network Analysis of Electrical Stimulation Mapping-Driven Diffusion MRI Tractography to Improve Preoperative Evaluation of Pediatric Epilepsy.

Authors:  Min-Hee Lee; Nolan O'Hara; Masaki Sonoda; Naoto Kuroda; Csaba Juhasz; Eishi Asano; Ming Dong; Jeong-Won Jeong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Cardiac substructure segmentation with deep learning for improved cardiac sparing.

Authors:  Eric D Morris; Ahmed I Ghanem; Ming Dong; Milan V Pantelic; Eleanor M Walker; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Abdominal synthetic CT generation from MR Dixon images using a U-net trained with 'semi-synthetic' CT data.

Authors:  Lianli Liu; Adam Johansson; Yue Cao; Janell Dow; Theodore S Lawrence; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT generated with GANs for MRI-only proton therapy treatment planning of brain tumors.

Authors:  Samaneh Kazemifar; Ana M Barragán Montero; Kevin Souris; Sara T Rivas; Robert Timmerman; Yang K Park; Steve Jiang; Xavier Geets; Edmond Sterpin; Amir Owrangi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.