Literature DB >> 32415552

Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body 18F-FDG PET using a deep residual network.

Isaac Shiri1, Hossein Arabi1, Parham Geramifar2, Ghasem Hajianfar3, Pardis Ghafarian4,5, Arman Rahmim6,7, Mohammad Reza Ay8,9, Habib Zaidi10,11,12,13.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We demonstrate the feasibility of direct generation of attenuation and scatter-corrected images from uncorrected images (PET-nonASC) using deep residual networks in whole-body 18F-FDG PET imaging.
METHODS: Two- and three-dimensional deep residual networks using 2D successive slices (DL-2DS), 3D slices (DL-3DS) and 3D patches (DL-3DP) as input were constructed to perform joint attenuation and scatter correction on uncorrected whole-body images in an end-to-end fashion. We included 1150 clinical whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT studies, among which 900, 100 and 150 patients were randomly partitioned into training, validation and independent validation sets, respectively. The images generated by the proposed approach were assessed using various evaluation metrics, including the root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) and absolute relative error (ARE %) using CT-based attenuation and scatter-corrected (CTAC) PET images as reference. PET image quantification variability was also assessed through voxel-wise standardized uptake value (SUV) bias calculation in different regions of the body (head, neck, chest, liver-lung, abdomen and pelvis).
RESULTS: Our proposed attenuation and scatter correction (Deep-JASC) algorithm provided good image quality, comparable with those produced by CTAC. Across the 150 patients of the independent external validation set, the voxel-wise REs (%) were - 1.72 ± 4.22%, 3.75 ± 6.91% and - 3.08 ± 5.64 for DL-2DS, DL-3DS and DL-3DP, respectively. Overall, the DL-2DS approach led to superior performance compared with the other two 3D approaches. The brain and neck regions had the highest and lowest RMSE values between Deep-JASC and CTAC images, respectively. However, the largest ARE was observed in the chest (15.16 ± 3.96%) and liver/lung (11.18 ± 3.23%) regions for DL-2DS. DL-3DS and DL-3DP performed slightly better in the chest region, leading to AREs of 11.16 ± 3.42% and 11.69 ± 2.71%, respectively (p value < 0.05). The joint histogram analysis resulted in correlation coefficients of 0.985, 0.980 and 0.981 for DL-2DS, DL-3DS and DL-3DP approaches, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This work demonstrated the feasibility of direct attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body 18F-FDG PET images using emission-only data via a deep residual network. The proposed approach achieved accurate attenuation and scatter correction without the need for anatomical images, such as CT and MRI. The technique is applicable in a clinical setting on standalone PET or PET/MRI systems. Nevertheless, Deep-JASC showing promising quantitative accuracy, vulnerability to noise was observed, leading to pseudo hot/cold spots and/or poor organ boundary definition in the resulting PET images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; Deep learning; PET/CT; Scatter correction; Whole-body

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32415552     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04852-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  35 in total

Review 1.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 2.  Scatter modelling and compensation in emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Kenneth F Koral
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the evaluation of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Simona Ben-Haim; Peter Ell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Joint Estimation of Activity and Attenuation in Whole-Body TOF PET/MRI Using Constrained Gaussian Mixture Models.

Authors:  Abolfazl Mehranian; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Clinical assessment of MR-guided 3-class and 4-class attenuation correction in PET/MR.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Olivier Rager; Asma Alem; Arthur Varoquaux; Minerva Becker; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Atlas-guided generation of pseudo-CT images for MRI-only and hybrid PET-MRI-guided radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Nikolaos Koutsouvelis; Michel Rouzaud; Raymond Miralbell; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities.

Authors:  Abolfazl Mehranian; Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Nicolas Karakatsanis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine image generation.

Authors:  Zhibiao Cheng; Junhai Wen; Gang Huang; Jianhua Yan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

2.  Deep learning-based attenuation correction for brain PET with various radiotracers.

Authors:  Fumio Hashimoto; Masanori Ito; Kibo Ote; Takashi Isobe; Hiroyuki Okada; Yasuomi Ouchi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  Deep-learning-based methods of attenuation correction for SPECT and PET.

Authors:  Xiongchao Chen; Chi Liu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  A review on AI in PET imaging.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsubara; Masanobu Ibaraki; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Watabe; Yuichi Kimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  Deep-TOF-PET: Deep learning-guided generation of time-of-flight from non-TOF brain PET images in the image and projection domains.

Authors:  Amirhossein Sanaat; Azadeh Akhavanalaf; Isaac Shiri; Yazdan Salimi; Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 5.399

6.  MRI-guided attenuation correction in torso PET/MRI: Assessment of segmentation-, atlas-, and deep learning-based approaches in the presence of outliers.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.737

7.  Direct and indirect strategies of deep-learning-based attenuation correction for general purpose and dedicated cardiac SPECT.

Authors:  Xiongchao Chen; Bo Zhou; Huidong Xie; Luyao Shi; Hui Liu; Wolfgang Holler; MingDe Lin; Yi-Hwa Liu; Edward J Miller; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  CT-less Direct Correction of Attenuation and Scatter in the Image Space Using Deep Learning for Whole-Body FDG PET: Potential Benefits and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Jaewon Yang; Jae Ho Sohn; Spencer C Behr; Grant T Gullberg; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-12-02

9.  Direct Attenuation Correction Using Deep Learning for Cardiac SPECT: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jaewon Yang; Luyao Shi; Rui Wang; Edward J Miller; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu; Grant T Gullberg; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 11.082

10.  Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia With Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Jae Ho Sohn; Spencer C Behr; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.