| Literature DB >> 31238540 |
Karl Kratkiewicz1, Rayyan Manwar2, Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi3, Joseph Fakhoury4, Jurgita Meiliute5, Steven Daveluy6,7, Darius Mehregan8, Kamran Mohammad Avanaki9,10,11,12.
Abstract
The marked increase in the incidence of melanoma coupled with the rapid drop in the survival rate after metastasis has promoted the investigation into improved diagnostic methods for melanoma. High-frequency ultrasound (US), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and photoacoustic imaging (PAI) are three potential modalities that can assist a dermatologist by providing extra information beyond dermoscopic features. In this study, we imaged a swine model with spontaneous melanoma using these modalities and compared the images with images of nearby healthy skin. Histology images were used for validation.Entities:
Keywords: cancer imaging; melanoma; optical coherence tomography; photoacoustic imaging; skin imaging; swine melanoma model; ultrasound
Year: 2019 PMID: 31238540 PMCID: PMC6630987 DOI: 10.3390/s19122815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Limitations of non-invasive melanoma imaging methods.
| Imaging Modality | Limitation | Clinical Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Depends on appearance of classic dermoscopic features. | Failure to recognize melanomas that lack specific dermoscopic criteria | |
| Data is projected onto the same plane | Obscures depth information of melanoma | |
| Limited field of view and penetration depth | Unable to determine depth of invasion | |
| Low specificity | Inability to diagnose type of tumor | |
| Analysis of chemical composition of melanoma | Lacks depth discrimination similar to multispectral imaging | |
| Analysis of electrical impedance spectrum of lesion | Cannot distinguish nevi from melanoma | |
| Limited penetration depth | Unable to determine depth of invasion |
Figure 1Principle of photoacoustic imaging. (a) Schematic of photoacoustic imaging setup for the acquisition of images from swine skin. (b) Optical absorption spectrum for most abundant photoacoustic absorbers in the skin with dashed lines showing wavelengths used in this study. Left: 532 nm; right: 1064 nm.
Figure 2Ultrasound (US)/photoacoustic (PA) system components. (a) Optical coherence tomography (OCT) system. (b) US/PA DAQ, processing, and storage units, (i) Vantage 128 DAQ system, and (ii) processing unit. (c) US/PA probe specifications. (d) US/PA probe in use on swine melanoma lesion. DAQ: Data acquisition unit, HSL: High-speed swept-source laser.
Figure 3Imaged suspect lesions. (a) (i) Abdominal, dark-brown pigmented plaque with irregular border confirmed as melanoma (black-circle), (ii) histology of nearby healthy skin (red-circle), and (iii) histology of the suspect lesion. (b) (i) Flank, large dark-brown plaque confirmed as melanoma (circled), (ii) histology of nearby healthy skin, and (iii) histology of the suspect lesion.
Figure 4Ultrasound images of melanoma lesion and nearby healthy skin. (a) Abdominal: (i) Lesion, (ii) nearby healthy. (b) Flank: (i) Lesion, (ii) healthy. (c) Bar chart of average pixel intensity from epidermal region of US images. E: Epidermis, d: Dermis, sc: Subcutaneous tissue. Fibrotic septa (arrows), epidermal layer pixels (yellow dashes).
Figure 5OCT images of melanoma lesion and nearby healthy skin. (a) Abdominal: (i) Lesion and (ii) healthy. (b) Flank: (i) Lesion and (ii) healthy. Melanomas demonstrate disorganization and thickening of the epidermis, larger rete ridges, an obscured dermal–epidermal junction (DEJ), and dermal tumor nests. Yellow circles: Dermal nests of melanocytes. Red lines: Dermal–epidermal junction. Green brackets: Epidermis. Light blue brackets: Dermis.
Figure 6Photoacoustic images of melanoma lesion and nearby healthy skin at 532 nm illumination wavelength. (a) Abdominal: (i) Lesion and (ii) healthy. (b) Flank: (i) Lesion and (ii) healthy. (c) Bar chart of average pixel intensity from epidermal region in the PA images of 532 nm. E: Epidermis. Epidermal pixels (white dashes). The PA signal was increased in the melanoma, highlighting the increase in melanin.
Figure 7Photoacoustic images of melanoma lesion and nearby healthy skin at 1064 nm illumination wavelength. (a) Abdominal: (i) Lesion and (ii) healthy. (b) Flank: (i) Lesion and (ii) healthy. (c) Bar chart of average pixel intensity from epidermal region at 1064 nm images. E: Epidermis. Fibrotic septa (arrows); averaged epidermal pixels (white dashes).
Advantages and disadvantages of US, OCT, and PA imaging for melanoma imaging.
| Imaging Modality | Imaging Capability | Advantage | Limitations | Findings in Lesional Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Structural–morphology of different structures in skin | Penetration depth (up to 2 cm) | Insufficient resolution even using high-frequency probes | (i) Weaker signal from epidermis and dermis |
|
| High-resolution morphology | Superior resolution (1~10 µm depending on the configuration of OCT) | Limited penetration depth (~1.5 mm) | (i) Broadened shape of rete ridges |
|
| Vascular pattern and oxygenation maps | Multispectral imaging | Insufficient resolution for cellular imaging | (i) Stronger signal from epidermis layer |