Literature DB >> 33585663

Toward automated assessment of mole similarity on dermoscopic images.

Yao Zhang1, Kamil Ali2, Jacob A George3, Jason S Reichenberg4, Matthew C Fox4, Adewole S Adamson4, James W Tunnell1, Mia K Markey1,5.   

Abstract

Purpose: Current skin cancer detection relies on dermatologists' visual assessments of moles directly or dermoscopically. Our goal is to show that our similarity assessment algorithm on dermoscopic images can perform as well as a dermatologist's assessment. Approach: Given one target mole and two other moles from the same patient, our model determines which mole is more similar to the target mole. Similarity was quantified as the Euclidean distance in a feature space designed to capture mole properties such as size, shape, and color. We tested our model on 18 patients, each of whom had at least five moles, and compared the model assessments of mole similarity with that of three dermatologists. Fleiss' Kappa agreement coefficients and iteration tests were used to evaluate the agreement in similarity assessment among dermatologists and our model.
Results: With the selected features of size, entropy (color variation), and cluster prominence (asymmetry), our algorithm's similarity assessments agreed moderately with the similarity assessments of dermatologists. The mean Kappa of 1000 iteration tests was 0.49 ( confidence interval   ( CI ) = [ 0.23 , 0.74 ] ) when comparing three dermatologists and our model, which is comparable to the agreement in similarity assessment among the dermatologists themselves (the mean Kappa of 1000 iteration tests for three dermatologists was 0.48, CI = [ 0.19 , 0.77 ] .) By contrast, the mean Kappa was 0.22 ( CI = [ - 0.00 , 0.43 ] ) when comparing the similarity assessments of three dermatologists and random guesses. Conclusions: Our study showed that our image feature-engineering-based algorithm can effectively assess the similarity of moles as dermatologists do. Such a similarity assessment could serve as the foundation for computer-assisted intra-patient evaluation of moles.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  agreement; image feature engineering; melanoma detection; mole; similarity; skin cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585663      PMCID: PMC7875082          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.1.014506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  25 in total

1.  First prospective study of the recognition process of melanoma in dermatological practice.

Authors:  Julie Gachon; Philippe Beaulieu; Jean Francois Sei; Johanny Gouvernet; Jean Paul Claudel; Michel Lemaitre; Marie Aleth Richard; Jean Jacques Grob
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2005-04

2.  Ugly Duckling Sign as a Major Factor of Efficiency in Melanoma Detection.

Authors:  Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste; Yanal Wazaefi; Yvane Bruneu; Raoul Triller; Luc Thomas; Giovanni Pellacani; Josep Malvehy; Marie-Françoise Avril; Sandrine Monestier; Marie-Aleth Richard; Bernard Fertil; Jean-Jacques Grob
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  The ABCDEF Rule: Combining the "ABCDE Rule" and the "Ugly Duckling Sign" in an Effort to Improve Patient Self-Screening Examinations.

Authors:  J Daniel Jensen; Boni E Elewski
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-02

4.  Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task.

Authors:  Titus J Brinker; Achim Hekler; Alexander H Enk; Joachim Klode; Axel Hauschild; Carola Berking; Bastian Schilling; Sebastian Haferkamp; Dirk Schadendorf; Tim Holland-Letz; Jochen S Utikal; Christof von Kalle
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Testing the Difference of Correlated Agreement Coefficients for Statistical Significance.

Authors:  Kilem L Gwet
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Optical Radiomic Signatures Derived from Optical Coherence Tomography Images Improve Identification of Melanoma.

Authors:  Zahra Turani; Emad Fatemizadeh; Tatiana Blumetti; Steven Daveluy; Ana Flavia Moraes; Wei Chen; Darius Mehregan; Peter E Andersen; Mohammadreza Nasiriavanaki
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin.

Authors:  R J Friedman; D S Rigel; A W Kopf
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  The number and distribution of benign pigmented moles (melanocytic naevi) in a healthy British population.

Authors:  R M MacKie; J English; T C Aitchison; C P Fitzsimons; P Wilson
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Accurate Segmentation and Registration of Skin Lesion Images to Evaluate Lesion Change.

Authors:  Fulgencio Navarro; Marcos Escudero-Vinolo; Jesus Bescos
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.