Literature DB >> 20231492

The impact of partial biopsy on histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: experience of an Australian tertiary referral service.

Jonathan C Ng1, Sarah Swain, John P Dowling, Rory Wolfe, Pamela Simpson, John W Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare partial and excisional biopsy techniques in the accuracy of histopathologic diagnosis and microstaging of cutaneous melanoma.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
SETTING: Tertiary referral, ambulatory care, institutional practice. Patients Consecutive cases from 1995 to 2006. Interventions Partial and excisional biopsy. Other factors considered were anatomic site, physician type at initial management, hypomelanosis, melanoma subtype, biopsy sample size, multiple biopsies, and tumor thickness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histopathologic diagnosis (false-negative misdiagnosis-overall or with an adverse outcome-and false-positive misdiagnosis) and microstaging accuracy. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained from multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Increased odds of histopathologic misdiagnosis were associated with punch biopsy (OR, 16.6; 95% CI, 10-27) (P < .001) and shave biopsy (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.7) (P = .02) compared with excisional biopsy. Punch biopsy was associated with increased odds of misdiagnosis with an adverse outcome (OR, 20; 95% CI, 10-41) (P < .001). Other factors associated with increased odds of misdiagnosis included acral lentiginous melanoma (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2-13) (P < .001), desmoplastic melanoma (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.1-13.0) (P = .03), and nevoid melanoma (OR, 28.4; 95% CI, 7-115) (P < .001). Punch biopsy (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.4-7.6) (P < .001) and shave biopsy (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.6) (P < .001) had increased odds of microstaging inaccuracy over excisional biopsy. Tumor thickness was the most important determinant of microstaging inaccuracy when partial biopsy was used (odds of significant microstaging inaccuracy increased 1.8-fold for every 1 mm increase in tumor thickness; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4) (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among melanoma seen at a tertiary referral center, histopathologic misdiagnosis is more common for melanomas that have been assessed with punch and shave biopsy than with excisional biopsy. Regardless of biopsy method, adverse outcomes due to misdiagnosis may occur. However, such adverse events are more commonly associated with punch biopsy than with shave and excisional biopsy. The use of punch and shave biopsy also leads to increased microstaging inaccuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20231492     DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  18 in total

1.  Pitfalls and important issues in the pathologic diagnosis of melanocytic tumors.

Authors:  Stanley W McCarthy; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

2.  Shave biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the initial evaluation of melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan S Zager; Steven N Hochwald; Suroosh S Marzban; Rony Francois; Kimberly M Law; Ashley H Davis; Jane L Messina; Vladimir Vincek; Christina Mitchell; Ann Church; Edward M Copeland; Vernon K Sondak; Stephen R Grobmyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Handheld photoacoustic probe to detect both melanoma depth and volume at high speed in vivo.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Guo Li; Liren Zhu; Chiye Li; Lynn A Cornelius; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.207

4.  Photoacoustic imaging of periorbital skin cancer ex vivo: unique spectral signatures of malignant melanoma, basal, and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Magne Tordengren Stridh; Jenny Hult; Aboma Merdasa; John Albinsson; Agnes Pekar-Lukacs; Bodil Gesslein; Ulf Dahlstrand; Karl Engelsberg; Johanna Berggren; Magnus Cinthio; Rafi Sheikh; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Desmoplastic melanoma: a review.

Authors:  Lucy L Chen; Natalia Jaimes; Christopher A Barker; Klaus J Busam; Ashfaq A Marghoob
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Techniques for Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessia Blundo; Arianna Cignoni; Tommaso Banfi; Gastone Ciuti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-21

7.  Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice.

Authors:  Sean Robison; Marjan Kljakovic; Peter Barry
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Management of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-09-12

9.  Melanoma m (zero): diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Marco Rastrelli; Mauro Alaibac; Roberto Stramare; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Maria Cristina Montesco; Antonella Vecchiato; Luca Giovanni Campana; Carlo Riccardo Rossi
Journal:  ISRN Dermatol       Date:  2013-04-11

10.  Accuracy of diagnostic biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: implications for surgical oncologists.

Authors:  Tina J Hieken; Roberto Hernández-Irizarry; Julia M Boll; Jamie E Jones Coleman
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.