Literature DB >> 33435375

Photoacoustic Imaging of Human Vasculature Using LED versus Laser Illumination: A Comparison Study on Tissue Phantoms and In Vivo Humans.

Sumit Agrawal1, Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh2, Kerrick Johnstonbaugh1, David C Han3,4, Colette R Pameijer4, Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli1,5,6.   

Abstract

Vascular diseases are becoming an epidemic with an increasing aging population and increases in obesity and type II diabetes. Point-of-care (POC) diagnosis and monitoring of vascular diseases is an unmet medical need. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) provides label-free multiparametric information of deep vasculature based on strong absorption of light photons by hemoglobin molecules. However, conventional PAI systems use bulky nanosecond lasers which hinders POC applications. Recently, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have emerged as cost-effective and portable optical sources for the PAI of living subjects. However, state-of-art LED arrays carry significantly lower optical energy (<0.5 mJ/pulse) and high pulse repetition frequencies (PRFs) (4 KHz) compared to the high-power laser sources (100 mJ/pulse) with low PRFs of 10 Hz. Given these tradeoffs between portability, cost, optical energy and frame rate, this work systematically studies the deep tissue PAI performance of LED and laser illuminations to help select a suitable source for a given biomedical application. To draw a fair comparison, we developed a fiberoptic array that delivers laser illumination similar to the LED array and uses the same ultrasound transducer and data acquisition platform for PAI with these two illuminations. Several controlled studies on tissue phantoms demonstrated that portable LED arrays with high frame averaging show higher signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of up to 30 mm depth, and the high-energy laser source was found to be more effective for imaging depths greater than 30 mm at similar frame rates. Label-free in vivo imaging of human hand vasculature studies further confirmed that the vascular contrast from LED-PAI is similar to laser-PAI for up to 2 cm depths. Therefore, LED-PAI systems have strong potential to be a mobile health care technology for diagnosing vascular diseases such as peripheral arterial disease and stroke in POC and resource poor settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep tissue imaging; hemangioma; laser; light-emitting diodes (LED); mobile health; peripheral arterial disease; photoacoustic imaging; stroke; vascular malformations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33435375      PMCID: PMC7827532          DOI: 10.3390/s21020424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  53 in total

1.  Molecular photoacoustic imaging of angiogenesis with integrin-targeted gold nanobeacons.

Authors:  Dipanjan Pan; Manojit Pramanik; Angana Senpan; John S Allen; Huiying Zhang; Samuel A Wickline; Lihong V Wang; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Towards a Low-Cost and Portable Photoacoustic Microscope for Point-of-Care and Wearable Applications.

Authors:  Ajay Dangi; Sumit Agrawal; Gaurav Ramesh Datta; Visweshwar Srinivasan; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.301

3.  Deep tissue photoacoustic imaging using a miniaturized 2-D capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer array.

Authors:  Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli; Te-Jen Ma; Srikant Vaithilingam; Omer Oralkan; Butrus T Khuri-Yakub; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Dictionary learning technique enhances signal in LED-based photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Parastoo Farnia; Ebrahim Najafzadeh; Ali Hariri; Saeedeh Navaei Lavasani; Bahador Makkiabadi; Alireza Ahmadian; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  In vivo label-free photoacoustic microscopy of cell nuclei by excitation of DNA and RNA.

Authors:  Da-Kang Yao; Konstantin Maslov; Kirk K Shung; Qifa Zhou; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Lithium niobate-based transparent ultrasound transducers for photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Ajay Dangi; Sumit Agrawal; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Light Emitting Diodes based Photoacoustic Imaging and Potential Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Yunhao Zhu; Guan Xu; Jie Yuan; Janggun Jo; Girish Gandikota; Hakan Demirci; Toshitaka Agano; Naoto Sato; Yusuke Shigeta; Xueding Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The rate of missed diagnosis of lower-limb DVT by ultrasound amounts to 50% or so in patients without symptoms of DVT: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuhong Zhang; Haifa Xia; Yaxin Wang; Lin Chen; Shengnan Li; Idrees Ali Hussein; Yan Wu; You Shang; Shanglong Yao; Ruofei Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Clinical optoacoustic imaging combined with ultrasound for coregistered functional and anatomical mapping of breast tumors.

Authors:  A A Oraevsky; B Clingman; J Zalev; A T Stavros; W T Yang; J R Parikh
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2018-08-31

10.  In vivo photoacoustic imaging dynamically monitors the structural and functional changes of ischemic stroke at a very early stage.

Authors:  Jing Lv; Shi Li; Jinde Zhang; Fei Duan; Zhiyou Wu; Ronghe Chen; Maomao Chen; Shanshan Huang; Haosong Ma; Liming Nie
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of skin tone on photoacoustic oximetry and tools to minimize bias.

Authors:  Yash Mantri; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Optical ultrasound sensors for photoacoustic imaging: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bo Fu; Yuan Cheng; Ce Shang; Jing Li; Gang Wang; Chenghong Zhang; Jingxuan Sun; Jianguo Ma; Xunming Ji; Boqu He
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

3.  Biomedical Photoacoustic Imaging and Sensing Using Affordable Resources.

Authors:  Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh; Wenfeng Xia
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Modeling combined ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging: Simulations aiding device development and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Sumit Agrawal; Thaarakh Suresh; Ankit Garikipati; Ajay Dangi; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-09-15

5.  Photoacoustic-MR Image Registration Based on a Co-Sparse Analysis Model to Compensate for Brain Shift.

Authors:  Parastoo Farnia; Bahador Makkiabadi; Maysam Alimohamadi; Ebrahim Najafzadeh; Maryam Basij; Yan Yan; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Alireza Ahmadian
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.