| Literature DB >> 29511627 |
Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad1,2,3, Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh4,5, Mahlegha S Hassanpour6, Fabrice Wallois4,5, Otto Muzik7,8, Christos Papadelis9, Anne Hansen9, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh1,2,8, Juri Gelovani3,10, Mohammadreza Nasiriavanaki3,11,10.
Abstract
Infancy is the most critEntities:
Keywords: Infants; Neonatal brain; Neuroimaging modalities; Photoacoustic tomography; Resting-state functional connectivity
Year: 2018 PMID: 29511627 PMCID: PMC5832677 DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Photoacoustics ISSN: 2213-5979
Fig. 1Overview of the pipeline for rs-FC data analysis. The processing steps are (1) data acquisition, (2) pre-processing, (3) region of interest (ROI) definition, (4) time-series extraction [49], (5) correlation analysis to generate weighted FC matrix, (6) thresholding to generate an adjacency matrix [50], and (7) network analysis.
Fig. 2Schematic of different resting state functional connectivity approaches including (1 st panel) In seed-based analysis, based on the time series of a seed voxel (or ROI), connectivity is calculated as the correlation of time series for all other voxels in the brain. The result of this analysis is a connectivity map showing Z-scores for each voxel (seed) indicating how well its time series correlates with the time series of other seeds. (2nd panel) In ICA, the functional data for different time points are reshaped to a single matrix (X). Then, based on the maximization of independence, this matrix is decomposed into two matrices: mixing matrix A, and source matrix S [54,55]. (3rd panel) In the graph theory the pipeline are as follow: (1) Extraction of the time-course of resting state data within each anatomical unit (ROI); (2) Calculation of a FC (i.e., network edge) correlation matrix between any pairs of nodes; (3) Thresholding the correlation matrix into a binary adjacency matrix; (4) Calculation of different graph theory metrics [56,57]. (4th panel) In clustering, after generating the initial connectivity map, based on a set of relevant characteristics, clustering algorithms attempt to group samples that are alike [58,59].
Fig. 3Formation of MRI based on the BOLD signal has several constituents: (1) a stimulus or modulation in background activity; (2) neuronal response; (3) synaptic or metabolic signaling; (4) complex relationship between neuronal activity and triggering a hemodynamic response (termed neurovascular coupling); (5) hemodynamic response itself [76]; and (6) the way in which this response is detected by an MRI scanner [77].
Fig. 4A basic EEG acquisition system is composed of (1) a set of electrodes to (2) extract the EEG time series from the scalp, (3) analog biomedical amplifiers with coupled analog low pass filters, analog-to-digital converters (A/D) [107], and (4) an interface with the data processing and display module. Brain waves measured by EEG mostly reflect electrical activity in the cortex, but include contributions from the whole brain.
Fig. 5MEG data acquisition and processing: (1) MEG time series are recorded by sensors [111] and after a (2) filtering procedure, (3) transformed to source-space time series by a beamformer algorithm [112]. (4) The resulting time series is then filtered in the alpha-band (8–12 Hz) and its phase and amplitude is extracted via Hilbert-envelope computation, resulting in 90 alpha-power time series [113]. (5) The model is constructed by taking the same AAL brain parcellation used for source-reconstruction of the MEG signal, and putting a model node in the centre of each brain area and construction an adjacency matrix for the FC.
Fig. 6After producing an appropriate PET tracer (1) and the radiotracer injection (2), (3) positrons are emitted within the subject’s body, combine with nearby electrons and annihilate [131]. The result is a pair of 511-KeV gamma photons released in opposite directions. PET scanners use pairs of radiation detectors to measure the nearly simultaneous, coincident interaction of the 511-KeV photons. The data recorded by the scanner is a collection of coincidence detections. In the reconstruction step (4), a mathematical procedure is implemented to convert the acquired data to tomographic images (5).
Fig. 7Schematic diagram of the fNIRS system. NIR-light are generated and guided to the human's head by optical fibers or cables. Another fiber bundle or cable directs diffusively reflected light from the head to detectors. A light detector captures the light resulting from the interaction with the chromophores (e.g. HbO, Hb), following a crescent-shaped path back to the surface of the skin.
Fig. 8Brain mapping using diffuse optical tomography. Optical Imaging: Brain activity is recorded by sending near infrared light into the brain and recording diffusely reflected light. The vascular response to the neural activity results in changes in the concentration of oxygenated and de-oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO and HbR) which results in changes in the optical absorption coefficient and so changes in the intensity of diffusely reflected light. DOT Image Reconstruction: Source and detector arrangement in a high-density DOT imaging array. Example first to fourth nearest neighbor source-detector pairs are shown. Forward light propagation model is constructed by registering the imaging array to the head model. 3D images of absorption coefficient changes are reconstructed. Image Analysis: HbO and HbR signals are generated by hemoglobin spectroscopy. Temporal filtering and spatial smoothing are applied to the images. Additional statistical analyses are performed to generate cortical maps of the brain activity [177].
Fig. 9Process of a photoacoustic tomography generation.
Characteristics of the neuroimaging modalities discussed in this review.
| Feature | fMRI | EEG | PET | MEG | fNIR | DOT | PAT | fUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial resolution | 2–3 mm | 2–3 cm | 4 mm | <1 cm | 10–30 mm | 5–10 mm | 50–500 μm | 100–500 μm |
| Temporal resolution | ∼1 s | <1 ms | ∼30–40 s | <1 ms | 20 ms | 0.1–1 s [ | 0.02–2 s | 1 ms |
| Non-Invasive | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Measurement | Hemodynamic activity | Electrical | Metabolic activity | Magnetic signal | Hemodynamic activity | Hemodynamic activity | Hemodynamic activity | Hemodynamic activity |
| Expensive | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Neural activity measurement | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | Indirect | Indirect | Indirect |
| Portable | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Long term recording | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sensitive to motion artifact | Yes | No | Yes | Less than fMRI | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Multi-modal capability | DOT, EEG, fNIR, PAT, PET | DOT, fMRI, fNIR, MEG, PET | EEG, fMRI, fNIR, PAT | EEG, fNIR | EEG, fMRI, MEG, PAT, PET | EEG, fMRI, MEG, PAT, PET | EEG, fMRI, MEG, PAT, PET, fUS | EEG, PAT, PET |
| Brain coverage | Whole brain | Cortex | Whole brain | Cortex | Cortex | <3 cm into the brain (/Cortex) | One slice | One slice |
| Loudness | Noisy | Silent | Silent | Silent | Silent | Silent | Silent | Silent |
It can be considered as a minimally invasive procedure (need of extrinsic contrast injection).
Strong head motion can lead to poor coupling between the scalp and the optodes, which alter the measured signal.
This information is for the transfontanelle photoacoustic imaging system.