Jakob Assländer1,2, Riccardo Lattanzi1,2,3, Daniel K Sodickson1,2,3, Martijn A Cloos1,2,3. 1. Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 2. Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The optimization and analysis of spin ensemble trajectories in the hybrid state-a state in which the direction of the magnetization adiabatically follows the steady state while the magnitude remains in a transient state. METHODS: Numerical optimizations were performed to find spin ensemble trajectories that minimize the Cramér-Rao bound for T 1 -encoding, T 2 -encoding, and their weighted sum, respectively, followed by a comparison between the Cramér-Rao bounds obtained with our optimized spin-trajectories, Look-Locker sequences, and multi-spin-echo methods. Finally, we experimentally tested our optimized spin trajectories with in vivo scans of the human brain. RESULTS: After a nonrecurring inversion segment on the southern half of the Bloch sphere, all optimized spin trajectories pursue repetitive loops on the northern hemisphere in which the beginning of the first and the end of the last loop deviate from the others. The numerical results obtained in this work align well with intuitive insights gleaned directly from the governing equation. Our results suggest that hybrid-state sequences outperform traditional methods. Moreover, hybrid-state sequences that balance T 1 - and T 2 -encoding still result in near optimal signal-to-noise efficiency for each relaxation time. Thus, the second parameter can be encoded at virtually no extra cost. CONCLUSIONS: We provided new insights into the optimal encoding processes of spin relaxation times in order to guide the design of robust and efficient pulse sequences. We found that joint acquisitions of T 1 and T 2 in the hybrid state are substantially more efficient than sequential encoding techniques.
PURPOSE: The optimization and analysis of spin ensemble trajectories in the hybrid state-a state in which the direction of the magnetization adiabatically follows the steady state while the magnitude remains in a transient state. METHODS: Numerical optimizations were performed to find spin ensemble trajectories that minimize the Cramér-Rao bound for T 1 -encoding, T 2 -encoding, and their weighted sum, respectively, followed by a comparison between the Cramér-Rao bounds obtained with our optimized spin-trajectories, Look-Locker sequences, and multi-spin-echo methods. Finally, we experimentally tested our optimized spin trajectories with in vivo scans of the human brain. RESULTS: After a nonrecurring inversion segment on the southern half of the Bloch sphere, all optimized spin trajectories pursue repetitive loops on the northern hemisphere in which the beginning of the first and the end of the last loop deviate from the others. The numerical results obtained in this work align well with intuitive insights gleaned directly from the governing equation. Our results suggest that hybrid-state sequences outperform traditional methods. Moreover, hybrid-state sequences that balance T 1 - and T 2 -encoding still result in near optimal signal-to-noise efficiency for each relaxation time. Thus, the second parameter can be encoded at virtually no extra cost. CONCLUSIONS: We provided new insights into the optimal encoding processes of spin relaxation times in order to guide the design of robust and efficient pulse sequences. We found that joint acquisitions of T 1 and T 2 in the hybrid state are substantially more efficient than sequential encoding techniques.
Authors: Philipp Ehses; Nicole Seiberlich; Dan Ma; Felix A Breuer; Peter M Jakob; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nikolai J Mickevicius; Joshua P Kim; Jiwei Zhao; Zachary S Morris; Newton J Hurst; Carri K Glide-Hurst Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-09-18 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Stephen P Jordan; Siyuan Hu; Ignacio Rozada; Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacioğlu; Darryl C Jacob; Sherry Huang; Michael Beverland; Helmut G Katzgraber; Matthias Troyer; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Xiaoxia Zhang; Quentin Duchemin; Kangning Liu; Cem Gultekin; Sebastian Flassbeck; Carlos Fernandez-Granda; Jakob Assländer Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Max H C van Riel; Zidan Yu; Shota Hodono; Ding Xia; Hersh Chandarana; Koji Fujimoto; Martijn A Cloos Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: David Leitão; Rui Pedro A G Teixeira; Anthony Price; Alena Uus; Joseph V Hajnal; Shaihan J Malik Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 3.609