Nikolai J Mickevicius1, Joshua P Kim2, Jiwei Zhao3, Zachary S Morris1, Newton J Hurst1, Carri K Glide-Hurst1. 1. Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The acquisition of multiparametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) is becoming increasingly important for functional characterization of cancer prior to- and throughout the course of radiation therapy. The feasibility of a qMRI method known as magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for rapid T1 and T2 mapping was assessed on a low-field MR-linac system. METHODS: A three-dimensional MRF sequence was implemented on a 0.35T MR-guided radiotherapy system. MRF-derived measurements of T1 and T2 were compared to those obtained with gold standard single spin echo methods, and the impacts of the radiofrequency field homogeneity and scan times ranging between 6 and 48 min were analyzed by acquiring between 1 and 8 spokes per time point in a standard quantitative system phantom. The short-term repeatability of MRF was assessed over three measurements taken over a 10-h period. To evaluate transferability, MRF measurements were acquired on two additional MR-guided radiotherapy systems. Preliminary human volunteer studies were performed. RESULTS: The phantom benchmarking studies showed that MRF is capable of mapping T1 and T2 values within 8% and 10% of gold standard measures, respectively, at 0.35T. The coefficient of variation of T1 and T2 estimates over three repeated scans was < 5% over a broad range of relaxation times. The T1 and T2 times derived using a single-spoke MRF acquisition across three scanners were near unity and mean percent errors in T1 and T2 estimates using the same phantom were < 3%. The mean percent differences in T1 and T2 as a result of truncating the scan time to 6 min over the large range of relaxation times in the system phantom were 0.65% and 4.05%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The technical feasibility and accuracy of MRF on a low-field MR-guided radiation therapy device has been demonstrated. MRF can be used to measure accurate T1 and T2 maps in three dimensions from a brief 6-min scan, offering strong potential for efficient and reproducible qMRI for future clinical trials in functional plan adaptation and tumor/normal tissue response assessment.
PURPOSE: The acquisition of multiparametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) is becoming increasingly important for functional characterization of cancer prior to- and throughout the course of radiation therapy. The feasibility of a qMRI method known as magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) for rapid T1 and T2 mapping was assessed on a low-field MR-linac system. METHODS: A three-dimensional MRF sequence was implemented on a 0.35T MR-guided radiotherapy system. MRF-derived measurements of T1 and T2 were compared to those obtained with gold standard single spin echo methods, and the impacts of the radiofrequency field homogeneity and scan times ranging between 6 and 48 min were analyzed by acquiring between 1 and 8 spokes per time point in a standard quantitative system phantom. The short-term repeatability of MRF was assessed over three measurements taken over a 10-h period. To evaluate transferability, MRF measurements were acquired on two additional MR-guided radiotherapy systems. Preliminary human volunteer studies were performed. RESULTS: The phantom benchmarking studies showed that MRF is capable of mapping T1 and T2 values within 8% and 10% of gold standard measures, respectively, at 0.35T. The coefficient of variation of T1 and T2 estimates over three repeated scans was < 5% over a broad range of relaxation times. The T1 and T2 times derived using a single-spoke MRF acquisition across three scanners were near unity and mean percent errors in T1 and T2 estimates using the same phantom were < 3%. The mean percent differences in T1 and T2 as a result of truncating the scan time to 6 min over the large range of relaxation times in the system phantom were 0.65% and 4.05%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The technical feasibility and accuracy of MRF on a low-field MR-guided radiation therapy device has been demonstrated. MRF can be used to measure accurate T1 and T2 maps in three dimensions from a brief 6-min scan, offering strong potential for efficient and reproducible qMRI for future clinical trials in functional plan adaptation and tumor/normal tissue response assessment.
Authors: Stefan Wundrak; Jan Paul; Johannes Ulrici; Erich Hell; Margrit-Ann Geibel; Peter Bernhardt; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Volker Rasche Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Alice C Yu; Chaitra Badve; Lee E Ponsky; Shivani Pahwa; Sara Dastmalchian; Matthew Rogers; Yun Jiang; Seunghee Margevicius; Mark Schluchter; William Tabayoyong; Robert Abouassaly; Debra McGivney; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marcel A van Schie; Petra J van Houdt; Ghazaleh Ghobadi; Floris J Pos; Iris Walraven; Hans C J de Boer; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Robert Jan Smeenk; Linda G W Kerkmeijer; Uulke A van der Heide Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Paul J Keall; Caterina Brighi; Carri Glide-Hurst; Gary Liney; Paul Z Y Liu; Suzanne Lydiard; Chiara Paganelli; Trang Pham; Shanshan Shan; Alison C Tree; Uulke A van der Heide; David E J Waddington; Brendan Whelan Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 65.011
Authors: Osman Akdag; Stefano Mandija; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Pim T S Borman; Tim Schakel; Eveline Alberts; Oscar van der Heide; Rutger J Hassink; Joost J C Verhoeff; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Bas W Raaymakers; Martin F Fast Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-03-09