| Literature DB >> 31075884 |
Michael A Malfatti1, Bruce A Buchholz2, Heather A Enright3, Benjamin J Stewart4, Ted J Ognibene5, A Daniel McCartt6, Gabriela G Loots7, Maike Zimmermann8,9, Tiffany M Scharadin10,11, George D Cimino12, Brian A Jonas13, Chong-Xian Pan14, Graham Bench15, Paul T Henderson16,17, Kenneth W Turteltaub18.
Abstract
This review summarizes recent developments in radiocarbon tracer technology and applications. Technologies covered include accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), including conversion of samples toEntities:
Keywords: DNA adducts; accelerator mass spectrometry; benzo[a]pyrene; biomarkers; cavity ring down spectrophotometry; cell turnover; metastasis; naphthalene; radiocarbon; triclocarban
Year: 2019 PMID: 31075884 PMCID: PMC6631948 DOI: 10.3390/toxics7020027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxics ISSN: 2305-6304
Figure 1UHPLC-AMS of [14C]-DBC and putative metabolites from human plasma 3 h after and oral dose of 29 ng 14C-DBC. The use of unlabeled parent DBC and standards (DBC-(±)-11,12-diol and DBC-(±)-11,12,13,14-tetraol) (top graph) allow for the identification of 14C peaks in plasma (bottom graph).
Figure 2Block diagram showing the PAMMS instrument configuration.
Figure 3PAMMS analysis of carbon-14 labeled amino acid standards, showing (A) extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) and (B) mass spectrum for glutamic acid.
Figure 4Annual averages of atmospheric 14C/C for the northern and southern hemispheres. Data before 1959 is derived from plant material while data from 1959 to present is derived from atmospheric CO2 collections and plant material. Data is reported in the Δ14C convention described by Stuiver and Polach [38].
Figure 5Workflow and validation of 14C-labeling cancer colonization assay. (A) Schematic of colonization assay workflow. Cells were first cultured with 14C-thymidine media to achieve single cell resolution and injected into NSG mice via the tail vein (TV), heart (IC), or subcutaneous (SQ) routes of delivery. Injected cells were allowed to metastasize for up to 12 weeks. Tissues were harvested at early (2 weeks post injection) and late (12 weeks post injection) time points and DNA was isolated and quantified using AMS. In parallel, the activity of 14C-thymidine label in cultured cells was quantified using liquid scintillation counting (LSC). AMS measurements and LSC readings were combined to calculate the number of colonized cells per each organ examined. (B) Tail vein and intracardiac injected cancer cell colonization. Profile of colonized cells in target tissues calculated from 14C signal in DNA from target tissues isolated at 2-weeks post injection, 7-weeks for intracardiac (IC), or 12-weeks for tail vein (TV) (n = 5).
Figure 6Tissue distribution of 14C-TCC in exposed offspring at postnatal day 42. Data is expressed as pmol of TCC/gram of tissue ± SEM (n = 5/sex). * p < 0.05, when comparing female to male offspring.
Figure 7Correlation of microdose-induced [14C]carboplatin-DNA adduct levels to therapeutic dose-induced adduct levels in cancer cell lines. (A) Diagram of carboplatin-DNA adduct formation. (B) Linear regression of microdose-induced versus therapeutic dose-induced carboplatin-DNA adducts. (C) Sensitive cell lines (blue) have significantly higher carboplatin-DNA adduct levels than resistant cancer cell lines (red).
Figure 8Correlation of microdose-induced [14C]carboplatin-DNA adduct levels to therapy response in bladder cancer PDX and patients. (A) Clinical study design. (B) Carboplatin-DNA adduct levels are significantly higher in the sensitive bladder cancer PDX model (green) than in the resistant models (red). (C) Correlation of PBMC [14C]carboplatin-DNA adduct levels to the response in 10 bladder cancer patients (green = responder, red = non-responders, line = mean adduct level).
Figure 9Overview of the ex vivo “diagnostic microdosing” strategy. (A) Radiocarbon-labeled cytarabine (ARA-C), idarubicin (IDA), or daunorubicin (DNR) bind to or are incorporated into AML DNA in proportion to the cellular sensitivity to each drug. The resulting drug-DNA “adducts” can be quantified by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). (B) Strategy for using in vitro microdosing to predict AML patient response to 7 + 3 chemotherapy. Cells isolated from a blood draw or bone marrow (fresh or viably cryopreserved) are briefly exposed to microdoses of each drug (triplicate wells per drug) and assessed by mass spectrometry for quantitation of drug-DNA adduct levels as biomarkers of clinical response to 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy.
Figure 10Correlation of ARA-C- and DOX-DNA levels to 7 + 3 response after in vitro dosing of 20 primary AML samples. PBMC were exposed to either exposed to a microdose of [14C]ARA-C or [14C]DOX at ~1% of the approximate plasma Cmax obtained with ARA-C CIV (A), ARA-C bolus (B), or DOX bolus (C) observed in patients. Cells were dosed for 1 h followed by DNA isolation and AMS analysis. These data show proof of principle that diagnostic microdosing is useful for predicting patient response to 7 + 3 chemotherapy, but a larger confirmatory study is necessary. Furthermore, the ARA-C and DOX-DNA adducts can be plotted together to differentiate responders and nonresponders—average adduct levels for each patient are shown for simplicity (D).